臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷(WHOQOL-BREF)應用於重度視障成人樣本之信、效度考驗研究
書刊名：教育心理學報
作者：張千惠 引用關係／鄭永福／金慧珍／李昕寧
作者(外文)：Chang, Sophie Chien-huey／Cheng, Yung-fu／Chin, Hui-chen／Lee, Hsing-ning
出版日期：2013
卷期：44:專刊
頁次：頁521-536
主題關鍵詞：臺灣簡明版生活品質問卷；信度；效度；重度視覺障礙；Adults with severe visual impairments；WHOQOL-BREF；Reliability and validity
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:322
本研究旨在應用台灣簡明版生活品質問卷（WHOQOL-BREF台灣版）測量重度視障成人之生活品質，以評估本問卷應用於台灣視障成人的信、效度。資料蒐集方式採用電話訪談。研究對象為全國重度視障成人，使用分層隨機抽樣法取樣。完成問卷之樣本人數共491人。研究結果：（一）項目分析結果顯示本問卷題目為測量重度視障成人生活品質之良好問卷。（二）信度結果顯示，在各範疇中的Cronbach's α 值為0.68～0.80；折半信度值為0.57～0.80。（三）效度方面，內容效度顯示，各題目與所屬範疇之相關值皆達中度相關程度；建構效度以驗證性因素分析評估，比較適合度指標（Comparative Fitness Index）為0.916；性別、年齡及教育程度三個變項皆存在生活品質差異，此結果與一般成人之生活品質的研究結果類似，顯示問卷具有良好建構效度。根據信度與效度的結果，本問卷具有可接受的信度及良好的效度。WHOQOL-BREF台灣版可適用於測量視障成人之生活品質。
This study examined the validity and reliability of WHOQOL-BREF when it was applied to adults with severe visual impairments. Telephone interviews were used for data collection. WHOQOL-BREF was administered to 491 adults with severe visual impairments using telephone interviews. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling method. A total of 491 participants finished the questionnaire. Results of item analysis indicated that the WHOQOL-BREF is a suitable questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life in adults with severe visual impairments. For reliability, the Cronbach's α value is 0.68 ~0.80, and split-half reliability is 0.57~0.80. For validity, content validity was indicated by medium correlations between items and their respective domains. Construct validity is examined by factor analysis and the CFI (Comparative Fitness Index) is 0.916. Results indicated differences in gender, age and education level. Results were similar to that of WHOQOL-BREF applied to adults without disabilities, which indicated structural validity. In conclusion, Results indicated that WHOQOL-BREF has acceptable reliaibllity and adequate validity when applied to assessing the quality of life of Taiwanese adults with severe visual impairments.
期刊論文
1.Huang, I. C.、Wu, A. W.、Frangakis, C.(2006)。Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population.。Quality of Life Research，15(1)，15-24。  new window
2.O'Brien, P.、Thesing, A.、Tuck, B.、Capie, A.(2001)。Perceptions of change, advantage and quality of life for people with intellectual disability who left a long stay institution to live in the community。Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability，26(1)，67-82。  new window
3.程景煜、劉榮宏、陳世真、李鳳利(200008)。Population-Based Study on Prevalence and Risk Factors of Age-Related Cataracts in Peitou, Taiwan。中華醫學雜誌，63(8)，641-648。  延伸查詢new window
4.Dagnan, D.、Ruddick, L.、Jones, J.(1998)。A longitudinal study of the quality of life of older people with intellectual disability after leaving hospital。Journal of Intellectual Disability Research，42(2)，112-121。  new window
5.Fresher-Samways, K.、Roush, S. E.、Choi, K.、Desrosiers, Y.、Steel, G.(2003)。Perceived quality of life of adults with developmental and other significant disabilities。Disability and Rehabilitation，25(19)，1097-1105。  new window
6.Kim, S.、Larson, S. A.、Lakin, K. C.(2001)。Behavioral outcome of deinstitutionalization for people with intellectual disability: A review of US studies conducted between 1980 and。Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities，26(1)，35-50。  new window
7.La Grow, S.、Sudnongbua, S.、Boddy, J.(2011)。The impact of visual disability on the quality of life of older persons in rural northeast Thailand。Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness，105，361-369。  new window
8.Mangione, C. M.、Berry, S.、Spritzer, K.(1998)。Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire。Archive Ophthalmology，116，227-233。  new window
9.Margolis, M. K.、Coyne, K.、Kennedy-Martin, T.、Baker, T.、Schein, O.、Revicki, D. A.(2002)。Vision-specific instruments for the assessment of health-related quality of life and visual functioning。Pharmacoeconomics，20(12)，791-812。  new window
10.Mcvilly, K. R.、Rawlinson, R. B.(1998)。Quality of life issues in development and evaluation of services for people with intellectual disability。Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilitiy，23(3)，199-219。  new window
11.Min, S. K.、Kim, K. I.、Lee, C. I.、Jung, Y. C.、Suh, S. Y.、Kim, D. K.(2002)。Development of the Korean versions of WHO Quality of Life scale and WHOQOL-BREF。Quality of Life Research，11，593-600。  new window
12.Neto, F.(1993)。The satisfaction with life scale: Psychometrics properties in an adolescent sample。Journal & Youth and Adolescence，22(2)，125-134。  new window
13.Pretty, G.、Rapley, M.、Bramston, P.(2002)。Neighbourhood and community experience, and the quality of life of rural adolescents with and without an intellectual disability。Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability，27，106-116。  new window
14.Perry, J.、Felce, D.(2003)。Quality of life outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities living in staffed community housing services: A stratified random sample of statutory, voluntary, and private agency provision。Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities，16，11-28。  new window
15.Rapley, M.、Ridgway, J.(1998)。Quality of Life talk and the corporatisation of intellectual disability。Disability & Society，13(3)，451-471。  new window
16.Skevington, S. M.、Lotfy, M.、O'Connell, K. A.、WHOQOL Group(2004)。The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group。Quality of life research，13(2)，299-310。  new window
17.吳冠穎、王天苗(200703)。他們是社會人嗎？--兩名啟智學校畢業青年的生活樣貌。特殊教育研究學刊，32(1)，35-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Stancliffe, R. J.、Emerson, E.、Lakin, K. C.(2001)。Community living and people with intellectual disability: Introduction to Part II。Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability，26(1)，5-14。  new window
19.Hughes, C.、Hwang, B.、Kim, J. H.、Eisenman, L. T.、Killian, D. J.(1995)。Quality of life in applied research: a review and analysis of empirical measures。American Journal on Mental Retardation，99(6)，623-641。  new window
20.Sands, D. J.、Kozleski, E. B.(1994)。Quality of life differences between adults with and without disabilities。Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities，29(2)，90-101。  new window
21.張英鵬(20010900)。我國大專身心障礙學生之生活品質研究。特殊教育學報，15，273-307。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.The WHOQOL Group(1998)。Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group。Psychological Medicine，28(3)，551-558。  new window
23.臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組(20000800)。臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展簡介。中華公共衛生雜誌，19(4)，315-324。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Schalock, R. L.(2000)。Three Decades of Quality of Life。Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities，15(2)，116-127。  new window
25.Chen, R. K.、Crewe, N. M.(2009)。Life satisfaction among people with progressive disabilities。Journal of Rehabilitation，75(2)，50-58。  new window
26.Young, L.、Sigafoos, J.、Ashman, A.、Grevell, P.(1998)。Deinstitutionalization of persons with intellectual disabilities: A review of Australian studies。Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability，23，155-170。  new window
研究報告
1.張勝成(1998)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「學校生活素質」之研究（II）。臺北：行政國家科學委員會／國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳靜江、鈕文英(1999)。臺灣地區身心障礙青年「心理生活素質」之研究（III）：感官或肢體障礙青年之心理生活素質 (計畫編號：NSC88-2614-H-017-005-F8)。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張雪會(2006)。老人視力障礙與視覺功能生活品質之流行病學研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.顏倩霞(2004)。大學視障學生生活品質之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Linn, R. L.、Gronlund, N. E.(2000)。Measurement and assessment in teaching。Merrill/Prentice Hall。  new window
2.邱皓政(2000)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.姚開屏(2005)。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊。台北：世界衛生組織生活品質問卷台灣簡明版發展小組。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳明隆(2006)。結構方程模式：SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市：五南。  延伸查詢new window
5.Leung, K. F.、Tay, M.、Cheng, S. W.、Lin, F.(1997)。Hong Kong Chinese version World Health Organization quality of life measure。Hong Kong。  new window
其他
1.內政部統計處(2010)。99年12月底領有身心障礙手冊者人數統計，http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/， 20101229。  延伸查詢new window
2.衛生署(2008)。身心障礙等級，台北：行政院衛生署。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Schalock, R. L.(1994)。The concept of quality of life and its current applications in the field of mental retardation/developmental disabilities。Quality of life for persons with disabilities: International perspectives and issues。Cambridge：Brookline Books。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：769（臺灣：763，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67500406
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上