:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:修平技術學院93至97學年度新生體適能差異之比較研究
書刊名:修平人文社會學報
作者:鍾德文 引用關係何育敏 引用關係林芳伶 引用關係褚曾文
作者(外文):Jung, Te-wenHo, Yu-minLin, Fang-lingChuu, Jseng-wen
出版日期:2010
卷期:15
頁次:頁85-106
主題關鍵詞:常模新生NormFreshmen
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:26
目的:是在探討並比較修平技術學院93~97 學年度新生體適能的差異性,為日後相關研究及體育課程設計之參考。方法:以93~97 學年度入學新生,總計4825 名(男生3129 名、女生1696 名) 為對象,所得資料以SPSS 12.0 電腦套裝統計軟體處理,以單因子變異數分析法(one-way ANOVA) ,分析比較各年齡層四項體適能之差異性,以α=.05 為顯著水準,研究結果:與台灣地區學生體適能常模比較,各年齡層的BMI平均值均介於19.7~25.2 之間理想範圍之內;心肺耐力、瞬發力、柔軟度數據顯示,普遍比台灣地區學生常模差,唯有肌耐力優於台灣地區學生常模;不同學年、各年齡層四項體適能差異性比較,心肺耐力:男生18 歲(F=9.18*)、19 歲(F=6.78*)、20歲(F=3.89*);女生18 歲(F=18.75*)、19 歲(F=3.35*),差異達顯著水準。肌耐力:男生18 歲(F=32.21*)、19 歲(F=16.93*);女生18 歲 (F=31.43*)、19 歲(F=11.99*)差異達顯著水準。瞬發力:男生18 歲(F=5.75*)、19 歲(F=4.51*);女生18 歲(F=4.87*)、19 歲(F=4.50*),差異達顯著水準。柔軟度:男生18 歲(F=7.35*),差異達顯著水準。結論:男、女生心肺耐力項目逐年退步的,應加強此部份的課程安排及運動訓練;肌耐力項目顯示逐年進步的,需繼續保持並加強訓練增進更佳水準。
Purpose: For the purpose of related research and development of physical education, we compared and studied the differences of health physical fitness of the freshmen in Hsiuping Institute of Technology from academic year 93 to 97. Method: Participants are 4825 (Male:3129, Female: 1696) freshmen in Hsiuping Institute of Technology from academic year 93 to 97. Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA of SPSS 12.0 to compared four health physical fitness items and were considered significant at α = .05. Result: First, compare to health physical fitness norm of students in Taiwan. The average BMI is located between 19.7~25.2, which is within the ideal range. But the scores of cardio-respiratory endurance, anaerobic power and flexibility are below average. Only the score of muscular endurance is above the health physical fitness norm of students in Taiwan. Second, compare the four health physical fitness items among each age group. The result indicated that the differences among male of 18(F=9.18*), 19 (F=6.78*) and 20 years old (F=3.89*)and female of 18(F=*18.75) and 19 years old (F=3.35*) are significant in cardio-respiratory endurance; The differences among male of 18 (F=32.21*), 19 years old (F=16.93*) and female of 18(F=31.43*), 19 years old (F=11.99*) are significant in Muscular endurance; The differences among male of 18 (F=5.75*), 19 years old (F=4.51*) and female of 18 (F=4.87*), 19 years old (F=4.50*) are significant in Anaerobic Power; The differences of male of 18 years old(F=7.35*)are significant in flexibility. Conclusion: The data indicated that cardio-respiratory endurance of male and female is gradually decline by age, we should reinforce the arrangement of the program and exercise training toward cardio-respiratory endurance; on the contrary, muscular endurance make progress every year, we need to maintain and reinforce training to reach a higher level.
期刊論文
1.盧廷峻、駱俊霖、張世沛(20081200)。嘉南藥理科技大學學生體適能現況調查。臺中學院體育,5,76-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許玫琇、鄭秀貴、李長燦、謝釗益(20070900)。美和技術學院學生與臺灣地區同年齡學生體適能常模之比較--以90-94學年度為例。美和技術學院學報,26(2),15-30。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳鏡清(20051200)。東吳大學學生體適能變化之研究。北體學報,13,198-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Ekclund, U.、Brage, S.、Froberg, K.、Harro, M.、Anderssen, S. A.、Sardinha, L. B.、Andersen, L. B.(2006)。TV viewing and physical activity are independently associated with metabolic risk in children: the European Youth Heart Study。PLOS Medicine,3(12),2449-2457。  new window
5.余瑩瑛、曾媚美、江中皓(20021200)。規律運動習慣對女性身體質量指數的影響。醒吾學報,25,481-491。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃憲鐘、許銘華、許家得(20081200)。國立中興大學96學年度學生健康體適能現況研究。興大體育學刊,9,25-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Tammelin, T.、Ekelund, U.、Remes, J.、Näyhä, S.(2007)。Physical activity and sedentary behaviors among Finnish Youth。Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,39(7),1067-1074。  new window
8.張世沛(20030600)。中臺醫護學院學生體適能比較研究。中臺學報. 醫護卷,14,177-189。  延伸查詢new window
9.方進隆(19990600)。大專概念導向的體適能教學。中華體育季刊,12(5)=49,112-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.鍾德文(2005)。修平技術學院89-92 學年學生體適能檢測分析。修平學報,11,179-203。  延伸查詢new window
11.鍾德文(2005)。修平技術學院89-92學年學生體適能檢測分析。修平學報,11,179-203。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.徐煋輝、姚承義(2002)。國立中央大學學生長期體能之比較研究373-379。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭麗霞(2003)。台南女子技術學院新生體適能狀況之探討。九十二年全國大專校院運動會體育學術研討會。台中市:國立台灣體育學院。556-567。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄒桂楨(2003)。東吳大學男生健康體適能概況研究。92年全國大專運動會體育學術研討會。國立體育學院。609-620。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許家得(2006)。技職校院學生健康體適能差異之比較研究-以黎明技術學院為例。臺中市:光鹽出版社有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國體育學會(2007)。中華民國體適能護照(大專學生適用)。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.American College of Sports Medicine(2002)。Fitness Book。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
4.方進隆、卓俊辰、錢紀明、黃永任(1999)。台灣地區大專院校學生體適能常模研究。臺北:中華民國體育協會。  延伸查詢new window
5.American College of Sports Medicine(2006)。ACSM's Resource manual for guidelines for exercise testing and prescription。Baltimore, MD:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins。  new window
圖書論文
1.方進隆(1997)。提升體適能的策略與展望。教師體適能指導手冊。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top