:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中部四縣市國小教師的環境風險教學行為模式之研究
書刊名:臺中教育大學學報. 數理科技類
作者:林明瑞 引用關係程文正
作者(外文):Lin, Min-rayCheng, Wen-cheng
出版日期:2010
卷期:24:1
頁次:頁29-56
主題關鍵詞:計畫行為論教學行為模式結構方程模式環境風險教學Theory of planned behaviorTeaching behavior modelStructural equation modelingEnvironment risk teaching
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:19
臺灣屬於高環境風險區域,對國民實施環境風險教育可以降低其潛在危害,而研究教師的環境風險教學行為模式則可以提供教育單位實施環境風險教育之參考。本研究在中部四縣市對國小教師進行分層隨機取樣,發出539份問卷,回收有效問卷327份,有效回收率60.7﹪。問卷回收後使用SPSS 12.0及結構方程模式LISREL 8.70 版進行統計分析。本研究以計畫行為論為理論模型,並依文獻回顧結果加入三個重要研究變項(認知、反應效 能及行動)形成研究架構,其旨在瞭解中部地區國小教師的環境風險教學行為模式及各行為概念間相互影響之關係。重要研究成果呈現如下:本研究之整體適配良好(GFI=0.93, SRMR=0.039, RMSEA=0.057, CFI=0.98)。由模式得知,認知、主觀規範及自我效能正向且顯著影響行為意向;認知及自我效能正向且顯著影響行為;行為意向正向且顯著影響行為及行動。本研究中部地區國小教師的環境風險教學行為模式對行為意向的預測力為52﹪、對行為的預測力為63﹪、對行動的預測力為29﹪。
In this study, theory of planned behavior was used as main theoretical model and joined three important research variables (perception, response efficacy and action) according to the literature review to shape the study construction. The main purpose of this study was to understand elementary school teacher's environmental risk teaching behavior patterns and the relations of the mutual influence in the main behavior concepts. Stratified random sampling was used in this study. 539 elementary school teachers in central Taiwan were sampled to carry on the questionnaires, and finally 327 effective questionnaires were obtained and analyzed. SPSS 12.0 and LISREL 8.70 statistics software were uesd to carried on the statistical analysis. The important research results presented as follows: The overall elementary school teacher's environment risk teaching behavior model was fair fit the data (GFI=0.93, SRMR=0.039, RMSEA=0.057, CFI=0.98). Perception, subject norm and self efficiency positively and significantly influenced behavior intention. Perception and self efficiency positively and significantly influenced behavior. Behavior intention positively and significantly influenced behavior and action. The behavior intention explanation strength in this study reached to 52﹪, 63﹪ for the behavior explanation strength, and 29﹪ for the action explanation strength.
期刊論文
1.文祖湘、蕭玥涓(200602)。從生態規劃論析都市休憩工程環境風險管理的策略研究。國立宜蘭大學工程學刊,2,1-14。  延伸查詢new window
2.Richard, D. E.(1994)。Risk literacy: Is it missing link in environmental education?。The Journal of Environmental Education,25(1),8-12。  new window
3.Leung, K.、Koch, P. T.、Lu, L.(1993)。A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia。Asia Pacific Journal of Management,19,201-220。  new window
4.李金泉、陳俊瑜、陳俊良(20060400)。健康的職場:壓力風險管理之應用。工業安全科技,58,11-16。  延伸查詢new window
5.Stern, P. C.(2000)。Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior。Journal of Social Issues,56(3),407-424。  new window
6.Jayanti, R. K.、Burns, A. C.(1998)。The antecedents of preventive health care behavior: An empirical study。Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,26(1),6-15。  new window
會議論文
1.黃靜怡、蔡宜珍、蘇筠雲(2002)。消費者對旅遊風險認知評估之分析。2002年不動產經營系曁休閒事業經營系學生畢業專題發表會。屛東市:國立屛東商業技術學院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.程文正(2009)。中部四縣市國小教師的環境風險認知及教學行為模式之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃柏鈞(2001)。環境風險知覺之研究--以神木村土石流為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.沈宇展(2004)。中部地區社區領導人的社區環境衛生行為意向、行為及社區環境衛生教育推動之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭時宜(2004)。影響環保團體成員三種環境行為意向之因素的比較(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.許哲彰(1999)。國小教師從事規律運動意圖、行為之預測及影響因素之探討--驗證計劃行為理論(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.宋明哲(1993)。風險管理。臺北市:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳淑卿、易正明(2007)。應用SPSS於統計學。臺中市:瑞和堂。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊冠政(2003)。環境教育。臺北市:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Burton, I.、Kate, R. W.、White, G. F.(1993)。The environment as hazard。New York:A Division of Guilford Publications。  new window
5.Geller, E. S.(2002)。The challenge of increasing environmental behavior。Handbook of environmental psychology。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.Robson, M. G.、Toscano, W. A.(2007)。Risk assessment for environmental health。New Jersey:John Wiley & Son。  new window
7.竺法護(1924-1935)。大寶積經。東京:大藏經刊行會。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃懿慧(1994)。科技風險與環保抗爭--臺灣民眾風險認知個案研究。五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Rea, L. M.、Parker, R. A.(1997)。Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide。Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
10.邱皓政(2006)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論、技術及應用。辰皓國際出版製作有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Dilley, M.、Chen, R. S.、Deichmann, U.、Lerner-Lam, A. L.、Arnold, Margaret、Agwe, J.、Buys, P.、Kjekstad, O.、Lyon, B.、Yteman, G.(2005)。Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis。The World Bank。  new window
12.黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Bandura, A.、Wessels, S.(1997)。Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control。New York:Freeman。  new window
其他
1.(2007)。深圳市內環境治理網,http://www.bjct.cn/zhili22/wrzl1550.htm, 20071227。  延伸查詢new window
2.賈建民(2003)。SARS風險認知調查,http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/health-promote-protect/sars-care/reportl-cuhk.pdf, 20071217。  new window
3.Ajzen, I.(2008)。Sample TPB questionnaire,http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.questionnaire.pdf, 20080518。  new window
4.USEPA(2009)。Environmental risk: Your guide to analyzing and reducing risk,http://www.epa.gov/region5/publications/risk.pdf, 20090703。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top