臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：隱喻與數位文化：由傳播與價值批判的角度省思
書刊名：新聞學研究
作者：孫式文 引用關係
作者(外文)：Sun, Sewen
出版日期：2011
卷期：108
頁次：頁141-181
主題關鍵詞：文化生態；公共領域；框架；著佐權；數位文化；隱喻；Copyleft；Cultural ecology；Digital culture；Frame；Metaphor；Public domain
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:72
數位媒介的發展讓各類資訊的複製與傳佈變得快捷且價廉。大眾使用資訊的方式亦隨之改變，相關的著作權理念因而成為不斷被爭辯的議題。支持強著作權的陣營，持續不輟地將著作權框架為財產與產權，以合理化擴大著作權保護範疇的訴求。而推動自由軟體和自由文化的陣營，也相繼建構出與財產分庭抗禮的隱喻，例如第二次圈地運動、文化生態、著佐權 (copyleft)。本文描述這些隱喻之間相互牽連的情況，並說明它們在國內與國際層次上的重要意涵。
In the era of digital media, reproduction and dissemination of various types of information has become easy and inexpensive. As a result, people’s ways of using information have also changed significantly, and therefore it is not surprising that the idea of copyright has become a constantly contested issue. Those who support strong copyright persistently frame copyright as property right and demand to maximize copyright protection. In contrast, those who advocate free software and free culture construct a new set of metaphors – such as intangible commons, the second enclosure movement, cultural ecology, and copyleft – to debunk myths about copyright protection. This article described the interconnections of those metaphors, and explained their significance both at domestic and international levels.
期刊論文
1.唐士哲(20060700)。尋找共享的政治：網際網路與全球公共財。傳播與管理研究，6(1)，79-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.翁秀琪(20081200)。知識商品化浪潮下學術知識公共化的省思：以臺灣的學術期刊出版為例。中華傳播學刊，14，3-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Yu, P. K.(2010)。The graduated response。Florida Law Review，62，1373-1430。  new window
4.Boyle, James(1997)。A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net?。Duke Law Journal，47，87-116。  new window
5.Boyle, James(2003)。The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain。Law and Contemporary Problems，66(1/2)，33-74。  new window
6.賴文智、王文君(20070400)。數位環境的著作權法制思考。圖書館學與資訊科學，33(1)，30-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.劉昌德(20080700)。等待果陀？--尋覓屬於創作者的著作權。廣告學研究，30，121-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Ochoa, Tyler T.(2002)。Origins and Meanings of the Public Domain。University of Dayton Law Review，28(2)，215-267。  new window
9.劉孔中(20061100)。論建立資訊時代「公共領域」之重要性及具體建議。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，35(6)，1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.顏向瑜、巫國豪、程致剛(2008)。「創用CC」--談網路社會中的共享運動。資訊社會研究，14，1-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.劉孔中、莊庭瑞(2005)。著作權、創用CC、公共領域與中央研究院。中央研究院週報，1043，5-6。  延伸查詢new window
12.盧文祥(2007)。著作採用創新授權機制衍生價值共享之探討。政大智慧財產評論，5(1)，1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Bridy, A.(2010)。Graduated response and the turn to private ordering in online copyrights enforcement。Oregon Law Review，89，81-132。  new window
14.Burger, J.(2010)。Filtering & graduated response to infringers。DVD and Beyond 2010 Magazine，12，46-50。  new window
15.Rose, C. M.(2003)。Romans, roads, and romantic creators: Traditions of public property in the information age。Law and Contemporary Problems，66(1/2)，89-110。  new window
16.Rose, M.(2003)。Nine-tenths of the law: The English copyright debates and the rhetoric of the public domain。Law and Contemporary Problems，66(1/2)，75-88。  new window
17.Samuelson, P.(2003)。Mapping the digital public domain: Threats and opportunities。Law and Contemporary Problems，66(1/2)，147-171。  new window
18.Smith, M. R.(2007)。Levels of metaphor in persuasive legal writing。Mercer Law Review，58(3)，919-947。  new window
19.Winter, S. L.(2007)。Re-embodying law。Mercer Law Review，58(3)，869-898。  new window
20.Ashton, R.(2009)。Can a Pirate change its ways and make money legitimately?。Music Week，4。  new window
21.Boyle, J.(2003)。The opposite of property: Symposium foreword。Law and Contemporary Problems，66(1)，1-32。  new window
22.Boyle, J.(2007)。Cultural environmentalism and beyond。Law and Contemporary Problems，70(2)，5-21。  new window
23.Dusollier, S.(2006)。The master’s tools v. the master’s house: Creative Commons v. Copyright。The Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts，29(3)，271-293。  new window
24.Johnson, M. L.(2007)。Mind, metaphor, law。Mercer Law Review，58(3)，845-868。  new window
25.Loughlan, P.(2006)。Pirates, parasites, reapers, sowers, fruits, foxes: The metaphors of intellectual property。Sydney Law Review，28，211-226。  new window
26.Ross, T.(1989)。Metaphor and paradox。Georgia Law Review，23，1053-1084。  new window
27.Sandefur, T.(2007)。A critique of Any Rand’s theory of intellectual property rights。Journal of Any Rand Studies，9(1)，139-161。  new window
28.Henly, B.(1987)。‘Penumbra’: The roots of a legal metaphor。Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly，15(1)，81-100。  new window
29.Herman, B. D.(2008)。Breaking and entering my own computer: The contest of copyright metaphors。Communication Law & Policy，13，231-274。  new window
30.Hesse, C.(2002)。The rise of intellectual property, 700 B. C.-A. D. 2000: An idea in the balance。Dædalus，131(2)，26-45。  new window
圖書
1.Patry, William(2009)。Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Litman, J.(2006)。Digital copyright: Protecting intellectual property on the Internet。Amherst, NY：Prometheus Books。  new window
3.Boyle, James(2008)。The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind。Yale University Press。  new window
4.Lessig, L.(2002)。The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World。New York：Vintage Press。  new window
5.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark(1999)。Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought。Basic Books。  new window
6.Lakoff, George、Johnson, Mark、Chou, Shizhen(1980)。Metaphors We Live By。University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Habermas, Jürgen、Rehg, William(1996)。Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
8.Bosmajian, H. A.(1992)。Metaphor and reason in judicial opinions。Carbondale, IL：Southern Illinois University Press。  new window
9.Merton, R. K.(1979)。The sociology of science: Theoretical empirical investigations。Chicago, IL。  new window
10.Merton, R. K.(1993)。On the shoulders of giants: A shandean postscript。Chicago, IL。  new window
11.Rose, M.(2002)。Authors and owners: The invention of copyright。Cambridge, MA。  new window
12.Witcombe, C. L. C. E.(2004)。Copyright in the renaissance: Prints and the privilegio in sixteenth-century Venice and Rome。Leiden, The Netherlands。  new window
其他
1.侯雅燕(2009)。提升形像 意義重大。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2009)。非法下載禁上網法國會過關。  延伸查詢new window
3.章忠信(2009)。南韓著作權法增訂網路侵權三振條款，http://www.copyrightnote.org/crnote/bbs.php?board=4&act=read&id=208。  延伸查詢new window
4.(2009)。網路著作權 侵權，三振。  延伸查詢new window
5.伊娃兒‧撒布(2010)。打擊網路侵權 祭三振條款 違規占智財案量六成 連犯三次，ISP 業者可砍掉使用帳號；今年將擬訂細則。  延伸查詢new window
6.江雅綺(2010)。侵權三振網友權益一網打盡？。  延伸查詢new window
7.江雅綺(2010)。網路人權淺介--由2009年的幾則新聞事件談起，http://hre.pro.edu.tw/zh.php?m=16&c=1264385782。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳王小珍(2009)。台灣自301名單除名，一掃盜版王國污名 保護智財權有成 不能停頓。  延伸查詢new window
9.何蕙安(2009)。ISP 法修正案 闖關失敗。  延伸查詢new window
10.何蕙安(2009)。執行是個大問號。  延伸查詢new window
11.何蕙安(2009)。ISP 使用者侵權 訂三振條款 立院初審著作權法修正草案 使用者被抓到三次侵權 權利人可通知ISP 業者斷線或砍帳號。  延伸查詢new window
12.林淑媛(2009)。台美簽投資協定 添籌碼。  延伸查詢new window
13.林淑媛(2009)。美特別301 台灣除名，十年來首次，有利我對外招商，資訊軟體業添利多。  延伸查詢new window
14.侯雅燕(2009)。10年來 我首度自特別301 除名 可望吸引跨國企業來台投資或設研發中心，對資訊、軟體業助益很大。  延伸查詢new window
15.張宗智(2009)。11年來首次台灣自特別301除名。  延伸查詢new window
16.游宜樺(2009)。防網路侵權 法擬建監控系統 全球首創！ISP 有權將非法下載用戶斷線 評論家擔心使用者可能轉入地下。  延伸查詢new window
17.曾桂香(2009)。可吸引國外高科技。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃朗倩(2009)。名單常變動 要小心。  延伸查詢new window
19.智慧財產局(2008)。97年6月大事記，http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ch/Download_DownloadPage.aspx?path=2911&Language=1&UID=5&ClsID=6&ClsTwoID=6&ClsThreeID=328。  new window
20.智慧財產局(2009)。著作權法部分條文正草案立法院經濟委員會審議通過版，http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ch/AllInOne_Show.aspx?path=2770&guid=94b82b63-47e2-4def-8a9e-b1411e1ce4ac&lang=zh-tw&pat。  延伸查詢new window
21.智慧財產局(2009)。著作權法部分條文正草案公聽會記錄，http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ch/AllInOne_Show.aspx?path=2770&guid=94b82b63-47e2-4def-8a9e-b1411e1ce4ac&lang=zh-tw&pat。  延伸查詢new window
22.劉尚昀(2009)。ISP 握尚方寶劍 網友剉咧等。  延伸查詢new window
23.Albanesius, C.(2009)。Comcast, others deny ‘three strikes’ piracy plan，http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2343977,00.asp。  new window
24.Anderson, K.(2009)。A new frontier for filesharing: As the government rethinks penalties for illegal downloaders, a new political party is campaigning for laws to keep pace with technology, Kevin Anderson talks to its leader。  new window
25.Anderson, N.(2008)。RIAA graduated response plan: Q&A with Cary Sherman，http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2008/12/riaa-graduated-response-plan-qa-withcary-sherman.ars。  new window
26.Anderson, N.(2009)。AT&T tests RIAA P2P program, but refuses to sanction users，http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/03/att-joins-riaa-program-butrefuses-to-sanction-users.ars。  new window
27.Bangeman, E.(2008)。European Parliament says “no” to disconnecting P2P users，http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2008/04/european-parliament-says-no-todisconnecting-p2p-users.ars。  new window
28.Anderson, N.(2009)。Verizon to forward warning letters (but that’s all)，http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/11/verizon-to-forward-riaa-warningletters-but-thats-all.ars。  new window
29.Bardeesy, K.(2009)。New owner says Pirate Bay will plunder no more; Swedish company pledges that the bane of copyright holders worldwide has a new model to facilitate legal file sharing。  new window
30.Clarke, J.(2009)。Pirate party to invade Ireland。  new window
31.Chapman, S.(2010)。Use open source? Then you’re a pirate! This year the Special 301 watchlist targets governments that use open source，http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?blogId=10&entryI。  new window
32.Chu, H.(2009)。A declaration of Web independence; Swedish youths back a budding political party based on a single issue。  new window
33.(2009)。Copyright protesters say law ‘stripping rights’，http://www.nzherald.co.nz。  new window
34.Doctorow, C.(2010)。EU Parliament votes 663-13 against ACTA’s enforcement measures，http://boingboing.net/2010/03/10/eu-parliament-votes.html。  new window
35.Edwards, C.(2009)。Technology: Sweden’s Pirate party sails to success in European elections。  new window
36.Ekman, I.(2006)。Politicians smell votes in Sweden’s file-sharing debate。  new window
37.Fulton, S. M.(2010)。Strongest condemnation yet of anti-counterfeiting, ‘three strikes’ from EU，http://www.betanews.com/article/Strongest-condemnation-yet-ofanticounterfeiting-three-strikes-from-EU/1268242864。  new window
38.Knopper, S.(2008)。RIAA’s gaze turns from users to ISPs in piracy fight，http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2008/12/19/riaas-gaze-turnsfrom-users-to-isps-in-piracy-fight/。  new window
39.Constitutional Council(2009)。Decision no 2009-590DC of October 22nd 2009，http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/root/bank_mm/anglais/en2009_590dc.pdf。  new window
40.Gannon, J.(2009)。Graduated response systems，http://www.iposgoode.ca/2009/04/graduated-response-initiatives/。  new window
41.Geist, M.(2008)。‘Three strikes and you’re out’ Internet policy strikes out。  new window
42.Guadamuz, A.(2010)。Encouraging open source could land you in trouble，http://www.technollama.co.uk/encouraging-open-source-could-land-you-introuble。  new window
43.Harris, J.(2009)。The pirates thrive on a scrap with the analogue crowd: The utopia envisaged by some online evangelists would be impoverished creatively, breeding many buskers and no Beatles。  new window
44.International Intellectual Property Alliance(2010)。2010 Special 301 Report on copyright protection and enforcement，http://www.iipa.com/2010_SPEC301_TOC.htm。  new window
45.Johnson, B.(2010)。When using open source makes you an enemy of the state，http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/feb/23/opensource-intellectualproperty。  new window
46.Kim, T.(2009)。Upload a song, lose your internet connection，http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2009/04/133_42594.html。  new window
47.Kravets, D.(2009)。AT&T, Comcast Deny RIAA ‘Three-Strikes’ Participation，http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/03/att-comcast-den/。  new window
48.Kravet, D.(2009)。MPAA wants congress to ‘encourage’ 3 strikes，http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/11/mpaa-filtering/。  new window
49.Nam, H.(2009)。Three strikes rule: Sleeping for seven months，http://hurips.blogspot.com/2010/03/three-strikes-rule-sleeping-for-seven.html。  new window
50.O’Brien, D.(2008)。European Parliament to Sarkozy: No “three strikes” here，http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/04/european-parliament-sarkozy-no-threestrikes-here。  new window
51.Office of the United States Trade Representative(2009)。2009 Special 301 Report，http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/reports-and-publications/2009/2009-special-301-report。  new window
52.Office of the United States Trade Representative(2010)。2010 Special 301 Report，http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/reports-and-publications/2010-3。  new window
53.(2009)。Why court case has made Pirate Bay more popular than ever。  new window
54.(2008)。Will France introduce the digital guillotine in Europe?，http://www.laquadrature.net/en/enditorial-willfrance-introduce-digital-guillotine-europe。  new window
55.Wray, R.(2008)。Online music sellers look beyond DRM，http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/apr/17/3。  new window
56.International Intellectual Property Alliance(2009)。2009 Special 301 Report on copyright protection and enforcement，http://www.iipa.com/2009_SPEC301_TOC.htm。  new window
57.Kravets, D.(2010)。ACTA backs away from 3 strikes，http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/04/acta-treaty/。  new window
58.OSFA refutes IIPA’s attack on open source software(2010)。Open source for America，http://www.opensourceforamerica.org/opensource-attack。  new window
59.Hartley, M.(2009)。Internet freedom movement wins EU seat; New party advocates stronger online privacy。  new window
60.Office of the United States Trade Representative(2010)。The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative releases statement of ACTA negotiating partners on recent ACTA negotiations，http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/press-releases/2010/april/office-ustrade-representative-releases-statement-ac。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1303（臺灣：1291，外國：12） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2133566 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67926028
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上