:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:十六國重要政權與同期拓拔鮮卑之漢化概況比較--以官方文教政策為討論核心
書刊名:淡江中文學報
作者:龔詩堯
作者(外文):Koung, Szu Yia
出版日期:2011
卷期:24
頁次:頁191-239
主題關鍵詞:漢化五胡十六國北魏拓拔鮮卑HniztionFive Ethnic MinoritiesSixteen-stateNorth WeiBei Wei DynastyTuoba Xianbei
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:39
西晉末以降,中國北方呈現為群雄割據、五胡十六國相繼崛起的動蕩情勢,最終由北魏弭平亂局並取得統一。因為如此,傳統對於這段時期漢文化之興衰起落的認知,往往是政治曲線的一種延伸,大抵上認為漢文化在戰爭頻仍的十六國時期受到嚴重斲害,必須等到北魏重新提振之後始得以逐漸恢復。本篇論文主要探討建立北魏的拓拔鮮卑一族之漢化歷程,並依照時間脈絡,逐次對前趙、後趙、前秦、後秦與慕容氏諸燕等當時重要政權之漢文化概況展開插敘,進行交叉比較,以顯示出拓拔鮮卑之漢文化水平在五胡之中的相對高度,從而提出反證:在中原地區發展的其他異族政權,對於漢文化經常有一定程度的重視,反倒是拓拔鮮卑長期排拒漢文化,即使到了北魏初期甚至中期,其進步的狀態也是十分有限的,實際上在五胡之中,可說是漢化最為遲緩的族群。
Since the end of Western Jin dynasty, the northern China was occupied by various powers. Five Ethnic Minorities and Sixteen-state rose one after another till North Wei suppressed all the revolts and troubles and united the area. Because of this, the traditional understanding about the rise and fall of Han culture during this period of time is usually an extension of political ”curve”. Most of the time, people think Han culture was serious damaged during the sixteen-state when there were always wars and battles. It was not until Wei that the Han culture was recovered. This paper mainly explores the Hniztion process of Tuoba Xianbei, who established North Wei. And according to the time sequence, the author will relate and make comparison about the general Situation of Han culture of those major regimes., such as Qian Zhao, Hou Zhao, Qian Qin, Hou Qin, Qian Yan, Hou Yan, Nan Yan, etc. to show the level of Hnistion of Tuoba Xianbei is higher than all the other states in the Five Ethnic Minorities. From this the author proves the other ethnic political powers developed in the central area of China usually attached importance to Han culture to a certain degree. It is Tuoba Xianbei that had rejected Han culture for a long period of time. Even during the early and the middle period of North Wei, its progressive condition was still very limited. In fact, North Wei can be said to be the slowest race to Hniztion among Five Ethnic Minorities.
期刊論文
1.秦永洲(1998)。東晉南北朝時期中華正統之爭與正統再造。文史哲,1998(1),69-76。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林晉士(1999)。北朝散文研究。國立中山大學,高雄。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王先謙、班固(1972)。漢書補注。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.錢大昕(1971)。廿二史考異。臺北:樂天出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1970)。詩經。十三經注疏。臺北:文化圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Wei, Shou(1972)。魏書。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.司馬遷(1972)。史記。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉學銚(2001)。五胡史論。臺北:南天書局有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.司馬光(1972)。資治通鑑。臺北:明倫出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉義慶、楊勇(197304)。世說新語校箋。臺北:樂天出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳先寧(199309)。北朝文學研究。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.魏徵(1972)。隋書。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊衒之、范祥雍(1978)。洛陽伽藍記校注。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.張金龍(200810)。北魏政治史。蘭州:甘肅教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳壽、裴松之、盧弼(1972)。三國志集解。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.沈約(1997)。宋書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.崔鴻、湯球、王魯一、王立華(2000)。十六國春秋輯補。山東濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
16.馬長壽(2006)。北狄與匈奴。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.馬長壽(2006)。氐與羌。廣西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.姚薇元(1977)。北朝胡姓考。臺北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.趙翼(1977)。廿二史劄記。台北:華世出版社。  延伸查詢new window
20.馬長壽(2006)。烏桓與鮮卑。廣西師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.房玄齡、吳士鑑、劉承幹(1972)。晉書斠注。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
22.梁啓超(1984)。論正統。中國歷史研究法。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
23.劉建中(2008)。五胡十六國論著索引。合肥。  延伸查詢new window
24.范曄、王先謙(1972)。後漢書集解。景印《二十五史》。  延伸查詢new window
25.李昉(1974)。太平御覽。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1984)。中國文史地圖: 遠古至南北朝,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE