Gaozi's opinion that Ren(love) is inside but Yi(Justice) is external is documented in Mencius. However, Mencius only criticized that Yi is external, without comment on that Ren is inside. It seems that Mencius agrees with the latter opinion. Gaozi's humanism is based on the naturalism, so that scholars always interpreted the love as physical affection to distinguish Gaozi's Ren from Mencius'. Consequently, Gaozi's Yi external becomes the best contraction with Mencius's Yi inside.However, Gaozi's opinion that Ren(love) is inside but Yi(Justice) is external is applied to deal with relationships respectively inside and outside the family. Such statements are recorded in Liji(Book of Rites), Liude(bamboo book), and so on. Such usage is also documented in Menzi(the text of Mencius). That is to say, Ren(love) inside may be the intersection of Mencius and Gaozi. Consequently, patriarchal vestige is unavoidably reserved in the development of Mencius' thought.Besides, with the advocacy of inner Yi, Mencius still extremely values the ritual system. No doubt, inner Yi is the criterion of ritual system. However, is ritual system one source of Yi? Is ritual system acquired by postnatal learning? If so, then we cannot deny the possibility of outside Yi, but inner Yi is still the ultimate criterion. On the contrary, if Yi derives from conscience, Yi will be not only the ultimate criterion but also the only origin. Without Mencius' determinate statement, therefore, there are different interpretations by Zhuxi and Wang yanming. By the contrast of Gaozi's Yi external, we can distinguish the three meanings of Mencius's Yi.