:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從共同作者之學科組合探討跨學科合作:以高分子學研究為例
書刊名:圖書與資訊學刊
作者:張郁蔚 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Yu-wei
出版日期:2011
卷期:3:3=78
頁次:頁42-62
主題關鍵詞:共同作者學科分佈學科組合跨學科合作高分子學Co-authorshipDisciplinary distributionDisciplinary combinationsInterdisciplinary collaborationPolymer science
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:38
有鑑於共同作者之跨學科研究結果僅呈現共同作者的學科分佈情形,未探討哪些學科之研究人員傾向一起發表文獻。本研究目的在以10種高分子學期刊為研究對象,分析1979年、1989年、1999年及2009年之共同作者學科分佈及學科組合情形。研究結果確認學科組合方式能提供更詳細之跨學科合作資訊,顯示高分子學合著論文的作者機構分佈於38個學科,但高分子學機構的研究人員僅與22個其他學科機構的研究人員共同發表論文,而高達189種的學科組合中,僅23.81%的學科組合包含來自高分子學機構的研究人員,反映高分子學是跨學科色彩顯明的研究領域。
The interdisciplinary research on co-authorship has primarily focused on the distribution of disciplines, rarely taking into account specific disciplinary combinations of co-authorship. To address this research gap, this paper conducts a case study of publications related to the field of polymer science, specifically articles from 10 journals published in 1979, 1989, 1999, and 2009, to analyze the disciplinary distribution and disciplinary combinations of the field. The results confirm that the analysis of disciplinary combinations reveals more detailed information of interdisciplinary collaboration than what disciplinary distribution has provided. Among 38 disciplines contributing to research in polymer science, researchers of polymer science only collaborate with researchers across 22 disciplines. In addition, only 23.81% of 189 types of disciplinary combinations involve authors affiliated with institutes of polymer science, indicating that polymer science is a strong interdisciplinary field.
期刊論文
1.Beaver, D. D.、Rosen, R.(1978)。Studies in scientific collaboration: The professional origins of scientific co-authorship。Scientometrics,1(1),65-84。  new window
2.Katz, J.S.、Hicks, D.(1997)。How much is a collaboration worth? A carlibrated bibliometric model。Scientometrics,40(3),541-554。  new window
3.Choi, J. M.(1988)。An analysis of authorship in anthropology journals, 1963 and 1983。Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian,6(3/4),85-94。  new window
4.Grover, V.、Ayyagari, R.、Gokhale, R.、Coffey, J.、Lim, J.(2006)。A citation analysis of the evolution and state of Information Systems within a constellation of reference disciplines。Journal of the Association for Information Systems,7(5),270-325。  new window
5.Pierce, S. J.(1999)。Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,50(3),271-279。  new window
6.Qiu, L.(1992)。A Study of Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration。Research Evaluation,2(3),169-175。  new window
7.Urata, H.(1990)。Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan。Scientometrics,18(3/4),309-319。  new window
8.陳光華、梁瓊方(20040900)。臺灣圖書資訊學之跨學科交流。圖書資訊學刊,2(2),31-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Sampson, Z. J.(1995)。Authorship counts: Forty years of the Physical Review and Physical Review Letters。Scientometrics,32(2),219-226。  new window
10.Stefaniak, B.(2001)。International cooperation in science and in social sciences as reflected in multinational papers indexed in SCI and SSCI。Scientometrics,52(2),193-210。  new window
11.Babchuk, N.、Keith, B.、Peters, G.(1999)。Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines: A comparative trendanalysis of scholarship in the social, physical, and mathematical sciences。The American Sociologist,30(3),5-21。  new window
12.Crow, G. M.、Levine, L.、Nager, N.(1992)。Are 3 heads better than one: Reflections on doing collaborative interdisciplinary research。American Educational Research Journal,29(4),737-753。  new window
13.Ding, Y.、Foo, S.、Chowdhury, G.(1999)。A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field of information retrieval。The International Information & Library Review,30(4),367-376。  new window
14.Van Leeuwen, T.、Tijssen, R.(2000)。Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: Analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows。Research Evaluation,9(3),183-187。  new window
15.Norris, R. P.(1993)。Authorship patterns in CJNR: 1970-1991。Scientometrics,28(2),151-158。  new window
16.Edwards, S.(1999)。Citation analysis as a collection development tool: A bibliometric study of polymer science theses and dissertations。Serials Review,25(1),11-20。  new window
17.Fox, M. F.、Faver, C. A.(1984)。Independence and cooperation in research: The motivations and costs of collaboration。Journal of Higher Education,55(3),347-359。  new window
18.Gu, Y.(2004)。Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis。Scientometrics,61(2),171-190。  new window
19.Hart, R. L.(2000)。Co-authorship in the academic library literature: A survey of attitudes and behaviors。The Journal of Academic Librarianship,26(5),339-345。  new window
20.Hinze, S.(1999)。Collaboration and cross disciplinarity in autoimmune diseases。Scientometrics,46(3),457-471。  new window
21.Laudel, G.(2002)。What do we measure by co-authorships?。Research Evaluation,11(1),3-15。  new window
22.Moody, J.(2004)。The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963-1999。American Sociological Review,69,213-238。  new window
23.Hunter, L.、Leahey, E.(2008)。Collaborative Research in Sociology: Trends and Contributing Factors。The American Sociologist,39(4),290-306。  new window
24.Lariviere, V.、Gingras, Y.、Archambault, E.(2006)。Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities。Scientometrics,68(3),519-533。  new window
25.Melin, G.、Persson, O.(1996)。Studying research collaboration using coauthorships。Scientometrics,36(3),363-377。  new window
圖書
1.鶴田禎二、川上雄資、薛敬和(2003)。高分子設計。新竹市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Furukawa, Y.(2001)。Polymer science: From organic chemistry to an interdisciplinary。Chemical sciences in the20th century。Weinheim。  new window
其他
1.National Science Foundation(2007)。Interdisciplinary, globally-leading polymer science and engineering: 2007 NSF Polymers Workshop,http://www.nsf.gov/mps/dmr/NSF_Polymer_Workshop.pdf, 20110610。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE