:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:實務與研究的整合:以實證為基礎之圖書資訊學研究初探
書刊名:圖書館學與資訊科學
作者:吳寂絹 引用關係卜小蝶 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chi-chuanPu, Hsiao-tieh
出版日期:2015
卷期:41:2
頁次:頁48-76
主題關鍵詞:圖書資訊學教育研究與實務落差實證圖書館與資訊實務Library and information science educationResearch practice gapEvidence-based library and information practice
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:82
  • 點閱點閱:76
實務與研究之間的落差,常見於具有專業實踐與學術研究的領域。如何銜接落差,一直是圖 書資訊學領域相當關心的議題。本文介紹近年來在歐美地區興起以實證為基礎之圖書資訊學研究 內涵與發展,並以其中較具代表性之期刊Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice 為對 象,透過內容分析了解其所發表文章之作者群背景、研究方法與主題。研究結果顯示美國與加拿 大為主要貢獻國家;70%的第一作者為圖書館從業人員;76%文章為單一機構作者,少見跨國合 著,呈現在地研究特性;合著模式以圖書館之間合作為主,圖書館與教學單位間的合作比例並不 高;所採用的研究方法超過60%集中於問卷調查、訪談及內容分析等;研究主題幾乎涵蓋所有圖 書資訊類別,其中又以「資訊素養與教學」、「資訊需求與資訊行為實徵研究」及「參考資訊服 務/數位參考服務」等三類主題較為熱門(分佔15%、10%及8%);文章所採用的資料來源多 為圖書館實際營運所得,且72%文章皆載明研究結果之具體應用方向,相較一般學術期刊論文, 更注重研究之具體應用價值。臺灣不乏具備研究能力之圖資專業人員,本文以歐美相關研究為鏡, 期盼促發更多館員對從事實證研究之興趣,以進一步提升實務決策品質及建立專業形象。
The gap between practice and research is commonly found in disciplines with both of professional practitioners and academic researchers. How to bridge the gap is also a continuing concern in the field of Library and Information Studies. This article describes the recent development of Evidence‐based Practice for Library and Information Science Research (EBLIP), and provides analysis of the journal EBLIP including its authors’ backgrounds, methods, and topics. The results show that the United States and Canada are the two major nations of contributors; more than 70% of first authors are librarians; 76% of the articles were contributed by one single institute, co‐authorship by cross‐nation institutes were rarely seen, and demonstrates local research interests; type of co‐authored agency is primarily among libraries; 60% methods employed include questionnaires, interviews and content analysis; the coverage of topics is rather broad, and the top three categories of research topics include Information Literacy & Instruction, Information Needs & Seeking Behavior, and Reference Services / Digital Reference Services (15%, 10%, and 8%); many datasets were obtained from real library practice, and 72% of articles provide specific implications for applications which highlight the value of implementation. Many librarians have the research capability, and this article serves as a purpose to introduce the evidence‐based research and encourage more such research done in Taiwan. Hopefully it may benefit and further enhance the quality of library decision‐making and their professional image.
期刊論文
1.胡述兆、王梅玲(19941000)。英美圖書資訊學碩士教育之比較。圖書館學與資訊科學,20(2),40-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Riggs, D. E.(1994)。Losing the foundation of understanding。American Libraries,25,449。  new window
3.Eldredge, Jonathan D.(2000)。Evidence-based librarianship: an overview。Bulletin of Medical Library Association,88(4),289-302。  new window
4.謝進昌(20111200)。國內後設分析應用研究發展之概況。教育研究,212,77-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.謝進昌(20101000)。國內教育學門系統性文獻評閱策略及後設分析發展現況與建議。教育研究學報,44(2),133-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王敏行(20081100)。身心障礙者職業重建體系的新思維。臺灣勞工季刊,16,42-47。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bayley, L.、McKibbon, A.(2006)。Evidence-based librarianship: A personal perspective from the medical/nursing realm。Library Hi Tech,24(3),317-323。  new window
8.Bexon, N.、Booth, A.、Brice, A.(2003)。Using research in practice。Health Information and Libraries Journal,20(4),240-243。  new window
9.Booth, A.(2003)。Bridging the research-practice gap? The role of evidence based librarianship。New Review of Information and Library Research,9(1),3-23。  new window
10.Booth, A.(2006)。Using research in practice。Health Information and Libraries Journal,23,69-72。  new window
11.Booth, A.(2009)。A bridge too far? stepping stones for evidence based practice in an academic context。New Review of Academic Librarianship,15(1),3-34。  new window
12.Booth, A.(2009)。Is now the time for an international association of EBLIP?。Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,4(3),68-71。  new window
13.Carnine, D.(1997)。Bridging the research-to-practice gap。Exceptional Children,63(4),513-521。  new window
14.Clyde, L. A.(2006)。The basis for evidence-based practice: Evaluating the research evidence。New Library World,107(5/6),180-192。  new window
15.Crumley, E.、Koufogiannakis, D.(2002)。Developing evidence-based librarianship: Practical steps for implementation。Health Libraries Journal,19(2),61-70。  new window
16.Deadrick, D.、Gibson, P.(2007)。An examination of the research-practice gap in HR: Comparing topics of interest to HR academics and HR professionals。Human Resource Management Review,17(2),131-139。  new window
17.Edmond, Tonya、Rochman, Estelle、Megivern, Deborah、Howard, Matthew、Williams, Cynthia(2006)。Integrating evidence-based practice and social work field education。Journal of Social Work Education,42(2),377-396。  new window
18.Eldredge, J.(1997)。Evidence-based librarianship: A commentary for hypothesis。Hypothesis,11(3),4-7。  new window
19.Eldredge, J.(2002)。Evidence-based librarianship levels of evidence。Hypothesis,16,10-13。  new window
20.Eldredge, J.(2006)。Evidence-based librarianship: The EBL process。Library Hi Tech,24(3),341-354。  new window
21.Given, L.(2006)。Qualitative research in evidence-based practice: A valuable partnership。Library Hi Tech,24(3),376-386。  new window
22.Glynn, L.(2006)。A critical appraisal tool for library and information research。Library Hi Tech,24(3),387-399。  new window
23.Haddow, G.、Klobas, J. E.(2004)。Communication of research to practice in library and information science:Closing the gap。Library and Information Science Research,26(1),29-43。  new window
24.Hall, H.(2010)。Promoting the priorities of practitioner research engagement。Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,42(2),83-88。  new window
25.Henderson, J. L.、MacKay, S.、Peterson-Badali, M.(2006)。Closing the research-practice gap: Factors affecting adoption and implementation of a children's mental health program。Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology,35(1),2-12。  new window
26.Hjörland, B.(2011)。Evidence-based practice: An analysis based on the philosophy of science。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(7),1301-1310。  new window
27.Hodgkinson, G. P.、Rousseau, D. M.(2009)。Bridging the rigour-relevance gap in management research: It's already happening!。Journal of Management Studies,46,534-546。  new window
28.Koufogiannakis, D.(2011)。Considering the place of practice-based evidence within Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP)。Library and Information Research,35(111),41-57。  new window
29.Koufogiannakis, D.、Crumley, E.(2002)。Evidence-based librarianship。Feliciter,48,112-114。  new window
30.Koufogiannakis, D.、Crumley, E.(2006)。Research in librarianship: Issues to consider。Library Hi Tech,24(3),324-340。  new window
31.Koufogiannakis, D.、Slater, L.、Crumley, E.(2004)。A content analysis of librarianship research。Journal of Information Science,30(3),227-239。  new window
32.Lerdal, S. N.(2006)。Evidence-based librarianship: Opportunity for law librarians?。Law Library Journal,98(2),33-60。  new window
33.Mancall, J. C.、Fork, D.、McIsaac, M. S.(1982)。Avenues of dissemination: Researcher to practitioner。School Library Media Quarterly,10(3),254-262。  new window
34.McClure, C. R.(1989)。Increasing the usefulness of research for library managers: Propositions, issues, and strategies。Library Trends,38(2),280-294。  new window
35.McKechnie, L.、Julien, H.、Oliphant, T.(2008)。Communicating research findings to library and information science practitioners: A study of ISIC papers from 1996 to 2000。Information Research,13(4),375。  new window
36.McKnight, S.、Booth, A.(2010)。Identifying customer expectations is key to evidence based service delivery。Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,5(1),26-31。  new window
37.McNicol, S.(2005)。The importance of evaluation and evidence-based skills to improving service delivery。Library and Information Research,29(93),26-34。  new window
38.Mulhall, A.(2001)。Bridging the research-practice gap: Breaking new ground in health care。International Journal of Palliative Nursing,7(8),389-394。  new window
39.Partridge, H.、Hallam, G.(2006)。Educating the millennial generation for evidence based information practice。Library High Tech,24(3),400-419。  new window
40.Ryan, P.(2006)。EBL and Library Assessment: Two Solitudes?。Evidence Based Library and Information Practice,53(1),18-20。  new window
41.Salvard, D.、Alcock, E.(2007)。Research and evidence-based librarianship in the corporate and academic library: Two recent graduates' perspectives。Feliciter,53(1),18-20。  new window
42.Senn, J.(1998)。The challenge of relating is research to practice。Information Resources Management Journal,11(1),23-28。  new window
43.Special Libraries Association(2001)。SLA research statement, as cited in Promoting the priorities of practitioner research engagement。Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,42(2),83-88。  new window
44.Sur, R. L.、Dahm, P.(2011)。History of evidence-based medicine。Indian Journal of Urology,27(4),487-489。  new window
45.Thomson, M.(1998)。Closing the gap between nursing research and practice。Evidenced-Based Nursing,1(1),7-8。  new window
46.Todd, R. J.(2006)。School libraries and evidence-based practice: An integrated approach to evidence。School Libraries Worldwide,12(2),31-37。  new window
47.Tucker, B.、Parker, L.(2014)。In our ivory towers? The research-practice gap in management accounting。Accounting and Business Research,44(2),104-143。  new window
48.Walters, W. H.、Wilder, E. I.(2015)。Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012。Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology。  new window
49.West, K.(2003)。The librarianship conference report: Convincing evidence。Information Outlook,7,12-14。  new window
50.尤小平(2006)。圖書館界應多些實證性研究:由海峽兩岸圖書資訊學術研討會引發的思考。圖書館學研究,10,2-3。  延伸查詢new window
51.王梅玲(20111000)。臺灣圖書資訊學碩士教育回顧與展望。圖書館學與資訊科學,37(2),20-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
52.邱子恆(20071200)。以實證精神規劃圖書館之服務。中華民國圖書館學會會訊,15(3/4)=146/147,39-42。  延伸查詢new window
53.邱五芳(2008)。中國圖書館學應進一步弘揚實證研究。中國圖書館學報,34(1),16-21。  延伸查詢new window
54.蘇勳璧、鄧振華、蘇治原(2006)。實證醫學(Evidence Based Medicine, EBM)的認識與應用。Bulletin of Taiwan Society of Laboratory Medicine,21(3),48-56。  延伸查詢new window
55.黨洪莉(2009)。實證圖書館學的思考。圖書情報工作,53(13),35-37+77。  延伸查詢new window
56.蘇諼(20040600)。從實證醫學的發展談醫學圖書館的角色。圖書資訊學刊,2(1),63-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
57.陳淑麗、曾世杰、洪儷瑜(20061000)。原住民國語文低成就學童文化與經驗本位補救教學成效之研究。師大學報. 教育類,51(2),147-171。new window  延伸查詢new window
58.張英陣(20061200)。Mind the Gap:研究與實務的整合。社會政策與社會工作學刊,10(2),87-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
59.Powell, Ronald R.、Baker, Lynda M.、Mika, Joseph J.(2002)。Library and Information Science Practitioners and Research。LISR,24(1),49-72。  new window
會議論文
1.Cullen, R.(1998)。Does performance measurement improve organisational effectiveness? A post-modern analysis。The 2nd Northumbria international conference on performance measurement in libraries and information services,(會議日期: 1997/09/07-09/11),3-20。  new window
2.Booth, A.(200007)。Librarian heal thyself: Evidence based librarianship, useful, practicable, desirable?。The 8th International Congress on Medical Librarianship。London。  new window
3.Partridge, H.、Thorpe, C.、Edwards, S. L.、Hallam, G.(200705)。The practitioner's experience and conception of evidence based library and information practice: An exploratory analysis。The 4th International Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Conference。Chapel Hill-Durham。  new window
4.Thorpe, C.、Partridge, H.、Edwards, S. L.(2008)。Are library and information professionals ready for evidence based practice?。The Australian Library and Information Association 2008 Biennial Conference,(會議日期: 2008/09/02-09/05)。Northern Territory。  new window
5.Turner, K. J.(2002)。Do information professionals use research published in LIS journals?。The 68th IFLA Council and General Conference,(會議日期: 2002/08/18-08/24)。Glasgow。  new window
圖書
1.范並思(2004)。20世紀西方與中國的圖書館學:基於德爾斐法測評的理論史綱。北京:北京圖書館出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Higgins, J. P. T.、Greens, S.(2008)。Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions。Hoboken, NJ。  new window
3.Gray, J. A. M.(2001)。Evidence-Based Healthcare。Churchill:Livingstone。  new window
4.賴鼎銘(2004)。資訊科學的思考。臺北市:文華圖書館管理。  延伸查詢new window
5.王崇德(1991)。情報科學原理。臺北:農業科學資料服務中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.Smelser, N. J.、陳光中、秦文力、周愫嫻(1996)。社會學。臺北市:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
7.Schön, Donald A.(1983)。The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action。Basic Books, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.Gorman, G. E.(2004)。Evidence-based information practice comes of age,http://www.emeraldinsight.com/info/librarians/Information_Management/info_curves2.jsp。  new window
2.臺北榮民總醫院教師培育中心(2007)。實證醫學教學證據等級,http://fdc.vghtpe.gov.tw/web2/index_11.asp。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Blick, A.R.(1984)。Information science research versus the practitioner。Representation and exchange of knowledge as a basis for information processes。New York, NY:Elsevier。  new window
2.Booth, A.(2004)。Formulating answerable questions。Evidence Based Practice for Information Professionals。London:Facet Publishing。  new window
3.Booth, A.、Brice, A.(2004)。Why evidence-based information practice?。Evidence Based Practice for Information Professionals。London:Facet Publishing。  new window
4.Booth, A.、Brice A.、Eldredge J.、Crumley E.、Koufogiannakis, D.(2004)。A future for evidence based information practice?。Evidence Based Practice for Information Professionals。London:Facet Publishing。  new window
5.Brice, A.、Hill, A.(2004)。A Brief History of Evidence Based Practice。Evidence Based Practice for Information Professionals。London:Facet Publishing。  new window
6.Lazarow, M.(2007)。The evidence-based model of information literacy research: A critique。Exploring methods in information literacy research。N.S.W.:Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University。  new window
7.Partridge, H. L.、Hallam, G. C.(2007)。Evidence-based practice and information literacy。Exploring methods in information literacy research: Topics in Australasian library and information studies。N.S.W.:Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University。  new window
8.Perryman, C.、Marshall, J. G.(2007)。Designing a curriculum in evidence-based practice for master's students in library and information science。Evidence-based librarianship: Case studies and active learning exercises。Oxford:Chandos。  new window
9.卜小蝶、張淇龍、張映涵(2012)。圖書資訊學研究。中華民國一○一年圖書館年鑑。臺北市:國家圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE