:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:詩性道德:Richard Rorty的道德想像及其德育啟示
書刊名:教育學誌
作者:許誌庭 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsu, Chih-ting
出版日期:2011
卷期:26
頁次:頁1-32
主題關鍵詞:新實用主義詩性道德後現代倫理學RortyRichard RortyPoetic moralPostmodern ethicsNeopragmatism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:32
藉由批判傳統以理性及語言為基礎的鏡式哲學, Rorty建立起獨樹一格的無鏡哲學,主張傳統哲學所引起的認識論爭論,並無益於哲學的發展,進而主張應以行動的結果做為檢視知識有效性的準則,這種觀點係繼踵 Peirce, James以及 Dewey之後,因而被稱為新實用主義。 除了對傳統哲學基礎的批判外, Rorty更致力於發展後現代境況下的道德方案,主張道德並不具有超越歷史的有效性,只是人們在偶然的情形下所得到的暫時共識,因而能提升人們團結感的不是那些宣稱對上帝意旨,或更為了解永恆人性為何的哲學論集,而是那些能描述人們情感的詩性文學作品。 藉由闡述 Rorty的哲學論點及所構作的詩性道德方案,本文試圖從中推演出對我國當前道德教育的可能啟示。文分五段,除前言外,將首先探討實用主義的思想傳統及 Rorty在新實用主義上的轉折,繼而探討 Rorty對傳統道德哲學的批判及其主張,進而提出對當前臺灣道德教育的可能啟示,包括「正視道德教育過程中個人情感的滿足」、「重視弱勢群體的道德議題」及「從文以載道到以文詠情」等,最後則是結論。
R. Rorty constructed the neo-pragmatism philosophy by criticizing the traditional mirror philosophy based on the fundamental of human reasoning and language. In Rorty‘s arguments, there is no foundation constructs the criterion of morale. The moral rules we decided to obey are just the contingency temporary consensus derived from the daily life. The aim of this paper is to explore the characters of Rorty’s moral program and its implications in Taiwan’s moral education. Three conclusions are made as follows: (1)the emotional desire should be included and be respected in the process of moral education; (2)the identity of minority should not be hooked on moral significance; and (3) the moral teaching with literature texts is to express the feelings about lived experiences instead of putting burden on the ideal cognition of morality.
期刊論文
1.畢恆達(20001100)。從兩性平等到性別平等:記葉永鋕。兩性平等教育季刊,13,125-132。  延伸查詢new window
2.許誌庭(20050600)。教育改革論述的後設分析:「理性與進步」蘊義的批判。國民教育研究集刊,13,111-125。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李奉儒(20050100)。尊重與關懷作為學校品格教育的核心。國教天地,159,20-29。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅逖(19930900)。Truth without Correspondence to Reality。歐美研究,23(3),1-25。new window  new window
5.羅逖(19940300)。Ethics Without Principles。歐美研究,24(1),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蘇永明(2000)。杜威的教育理論有多'實用'?。初等教育學報,7,167-184。  延伸查詢new window
7.Rorty, R.(1962)。Realism, Categories, and the Linguistic turn。International Philosophical Quarterly,2,307-322。  new window
圖書
1.劉宏信、James, W.(2007)。實用主義。台北:立緒。  延伸查詢new window
2.李琪明(2001)。兩岸德育與意識型態。台北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Kohlberg, Lawrence(1981)。Essays on Moral Development: The Philosophy of Moral Development。San Francisco, CA:Harper & Row。  new window
4.Rorty, Richard(1999)。Philosophy and social hope。Penguin Books。  new window
5.Rorty, Richard(1967)。The Linguistic Turn: Recent Essays in Philosophical Method。Chicago, Illinois:University of Chicago Press。  new window
6.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
7.Rorty, Richard(1982)。Consequences of Pragmatism。Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press。  new window
8.Bauman, Zygmunt(1993)。Postmodern Ethics。Blackwell。  new window
9.Rorty, Richard McKay(1989)。Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Rorty, Richard(1979)。Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature。Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Hall, Stuart(1997)。Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices。SAGE Publication Ltd.。  new window
12.Dewey, John、林寶山(1989)。民主主義與教育。五南。  延伸查詢new window
13.呂文江、G. Sorel(2003)。進步的幻象。上海:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.Peirce, C. S.(1997)。Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking: the 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism。New York。  new window
15.Smith, A.(2007)。The theory of moral sentiments。Saint Louis Park, N. M.。  new window
16.Ryle, G.(2002)。The concept of mind。Chicago。  new window
17.Mounce, H. O.(1997)。The Two Pragmatisms: Form Peirce to Rorty。London ; New York。  new window
18.Sayer, A.(2005)。The moral signifiance of class。New York。  new window
19.李幼蒸(1994)。解構和迴避--論德里達。哲學和自然之鏡 (附錄二)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
20.徐文瑞(1998)。新實用主義者Rorty。偶然、反諷與團結 (導言)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
21.Rorty, R.(1995)。Philosopher and future。Rorty and pragmatism: The philosopher responds to his critics。Nashville。  new window
22.Gilligan, C.(1997)。In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality。Feminist social thought: A reader。New York ; London。  new window
圖書論文
1.Noddings, N.(1995)。Care and Moral Education。Critical Conversations in Philosophy of Education。Routledge。  new window
2.Beck, C.(1995)。Postmodernism, Ethics, and Moral Education。Critical Conversations in Philosophy of Education。London:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top