目的：了解不同背景變項的教師，其休閒參與現況如何。 方法：研究對象為嘉義以南之7間五年制醫護管理專科學校教師，共計回收有效問卷219份，有效回收率43.8%，以自編之「五年制醫護管理專科學校教師休閒參與現況調查問卷」，進行調查，回收之問卷資料以SPSS10.0統計軟體為輔助工具，所使用的分析方法為描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定(t-test)及單因子變異數分析 (one-way ANOVA)。 結果：一、五年制醫護管理專科學校教師每週有10~11次從事休閒活動的時間。而從事的休閒活動型態以「消遣娛樂性活動」為最多，之後依序為「知識學習性活動」、「健身體能性活動」、「社交服務性活動」、「技藝嗜好性活動」以及「戶外遊憩性活動」。二、在不同背景因素之休閒參與差異比較方面：(一)、男性教師在「健身體能性活動」顯著高於女性教師；(二)、「大學學歷」的教師顯著高於「研究所學歷」的教師；(三)、「60歲以上」的教師在「技藝嗜好性活動」顯著高於「30~40歲」的教師；(四)、「夫妻獨住」的教師顯著高於「單獨居住」的教師；(五)、不同平均收入的教師在「消遣娛樂性活動」達顯著水準，進行事後比較後得知：「40,001~50,000元」的教師顯著高於「50,001~60,000元」、「60,001~70,000元」與「70,000元以上」的教師。 結論：台灣傳統觀念，女性以靜態的休閒活動為主，以至於喪失掉許多從事休閒活動的機會，為有效的利用休閒時間，建議利用並從事有意義的休閒活動。

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to understand the status of the different backgrounds teachers in leisure participation. Methods: Therefore, subjects of the seven south of Chiayi Junior College of Health Care and Management’s teachers. The questionnaire was designed by myself. After received the questionnaire data, the tool of software is SPSS10.0 statistical tools. Then, methods of analysis used descriptive statistics, independent sample t test (t-test) and single factor analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) were analyzed. Results: The results are as follows: First, the data shows the Junior College of Health Care and Management’s teachers will be 10 to 11 times per week engaged in leisure activities. As for the types of leisure activities engaged in by "entertainment activities" as the most, followed by the order of "knowledge learning activities", "physical fitness activities”, "social service activities ", the "skill hobby activities" and "Outdoor recreation activities”. Second, the various background factors comparison of their leisure participation: (a), male teachers in the "physical fitness activities, " significantly higher than that of female teachers; (b), "university degree" in teachers significantly higher than the "college graduates" of the teachers; (c), "over 60 years" teachers in the "art of hobby activities" significantly higher than "30 to 40 years old" teachers; (d), "husband and wife living alone" teachers significantly higher than the "living alone" teachers; (e), the average income of different teachers in the "entertainment activities" of a significant level, compared afterwards that: "40,001 ~ 50,000" significantly higher for teachers In the "50,001 ~ 60,000", "60,001 ~ 70,000" and "70,000 more" teachers. Conclusions: College teachers' will lose a lot of chance to join in leisure participation, because of the traditional concept with Taiwan's of women's. To engage in meaningful leisure activities, in order to using leisure time effectively.