臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：在數位時代的新聞識讀教育：一套批判的新聞識讀模式
書刊名：資訊社會研究
作者：林宇玲 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Yu-ling
出版日期：2012
卷期：22
頁次：頁1-20
主題關鍵詞：年輕人；校園霸凌；批判識讀；新聞教育；新聞識讀；數位公民權；Youth；School bullying；Critical literacy；News education；News literacy；Digital citizenship
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:70
新聞媒體受到泛政治化和商業化的影響，新聞品質日益惡化。新聞組織卻以民眾想看為由，而不願意改變其經營方針，因此若想改善現前的新聞環境似乎只能從民眾的收視習慣著手，特別是從年輕學子開始，透過新聞識讀教育提升其批判能力，以督促媒體改善其報導方式。 本文不同於傳統的新聞—公民模式，並不強調年輕人一定要接收嚴肅或硬性新聞，才能關心公眾事務。相反，本文受到文化研究的影響，認為年輕人雖然偏好娛樂資訊或小報新聞，但他們在獲取文本愉悅（如：窺視）的同時，也能藉此得知、談論，甚或參與社會上所發生之事。不過，為避免年輕人沈溺於順從性的愉悅與認同，本文仍主張藉由批判的識讀教育，培養其對新聞的解讀與產製能力。 由於多數年輕人對新聞產製的過程較陌生，經常誤以為新聞文本比其他文類更真實，因此本文採用Knobel 和Lankshear的批判識讀架構，發展出一套結合讀寫技術、文本解讀及數位生產的新聞識讀模式，以協助學生提升批判意識，同時鼓勵其利用新科技參與新聞的生產，一同加入公民新聞的行列，共同關注社會議題。
Taiwan's news media are influenced by political and commercial environment. News quality is getting worst. But news institutions argue that people want to see the extent so that they are reluctant to change their operation principles. Therefore, if we want to improve news quality, the news reception patterns of people have to be changed. Especially, young students shall be asked to enhance their critical thinking through media education, in order to urge news media to improve their ways of reporting. Different from traditional model of news-citizen, this article does not emphasize that young people are concerned with public matters only through receiving hard news. On the contrary, influenced by cultural studies, this article argues that young people prefer to entertainment information or tabloid news, but they are also informed, talk about, or even participate what happened in the society, while they get pleasure in reading those texts. However, in order to avoid dominated pleasures and identities of young people, this article advocates that young students have to enhance their competence of news reading and production by learning critical news literacy. Because most of the students are unfamiliar with the process of news production, they often misunderstand that news as facts are different from other genres. Based on the framework of critical literacy proposed by Knobel and Lankshear, this article develops a model of critical news literacy, in order to help young students cultivate their ability of reading news.
期刊論文
1.Hermes, J.(2006)。Citizenship in the age of the internet。European Journal of Communication，21(3)，295-309。  new window
2.羅文輝、鍾蔚文(19911200)。電視新聞對青少年政治知識的影響。新聞學研究，45，81-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Zelizer, B.(2004)。When facts, truth and reality are God-terms: On journalism's uneasy place in cultural studies。Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies，1(1)，110-119。  new window
4.Burgess, Jean(2006)。Hearing Ordinary Voices: Cultural Studies, Vernacular Creativity and Digital Storytelling。Continuum，20(2)，201-214。  new window
5.Kellner, D.、Share, J.(2005)。Toward critical media literacy: Core concepts, debates, organizations, and policy。Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education，26(3)，369-386。  new window
6.Bennett, L.、Wells, C.、Rank, A.(2009)。Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age。Citizenship Studies，13(2)，105-120。  new window
圖書
1.林宇玲(2008)。兒童與網路：從批判角度探討偏遠地區兒童網路使用。臺北：秀威資訊科技股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Freire, Paulo(1970)。Pedagogy of the Oppressed。New York：Seabury Press。  new window
其他
1.Knobel, M.，Lankshear, C.(2002)。Critical cyberliteracies: What young people can teach us about reading and writing the world，http://www.geodties.eom/c.lankshear/cyberliteracies.html， 2004/09/01。  new window
2.王姵雯(2002)。影響台北市青少年學生電視識讀能力相關因素之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.何巧姿(2006)。台北地區大學生電視新聞識讀能力之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.林宇玲(2009)。賦權概念下的兒童數位識讀與公民參與。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉嘉薇、陳義彥(2005)。資訊時代的媒介認知、媒介行為與政治參與。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭立琦(2008)。大學生對電子報與傳統報的閱讀行為差異分析--以南台科技大學學生為例。  延伸查詢new window
7.Aldridge, M.(2001)。Confessional culture, masculinity and emotional work。  new window
8.Balnaves, M., Mayrhofer, D. & Shoesmith, B.(2004)。Media professions and the new Humanism。  new window
9.Barnhurst, K. G(1998)。Politics in the fine meshes: young citizens, power and media。  new window
10.Barger, W. & Barney, R. D.(2004)。Media-citizen reciprocity as a moral mandate。  new window
11.Baumgartner, J. & Morris, J. S(2006)。The daily show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth。  new window
12.Beach, R(2009)。News literacy&K-12 teaching standards。  new window
13.Bennett, W. L.(2007)。Civic Learning in Changing Democracies: Challenges for Citizenship and Civic Education。  new window
14.Buckingham, D.(1997)。News media, political socialization and popular citizenship: towards a new agenda。  new window
15.Coleman, R., Lieber, P., Mendelson, A. L. & Kurpius, D. D.(2008)。Public life and the internet: if you build a better website, will citizens become engaged?。  new window
16.Dahlberg, L.(2007)。‘Do-it yourself’ digital citizenship: A preliminary interrogation。  new window
17.Deuze, M.(2008)。The changing context of news work: liquid journalism and monitorial citizenship。  new window
18.Feldman, L(2007)。The News about comedy: Young audiences, The Daily Show, and evolving notions of journalism。  new window
19.Freire, P.(1970)。Popular news in the 21th Century Time for a new critical approach?。  new window
20.Harrington, S.(2008)。Future-proofing journalism, Continnuum。  new window
21.Hammett, R(1999)。Intermediality, hypermedia, and critical media literacy。  new window
22.Hartley, J(1996)。Popular Reality，London：Arnold。  new window
23.Hujanen, J. & Pietikäinen, S.(2004)。Interaction uses of journalism: Crossing between technological potential and young people's news-using practices。  new window
24.Kretovics, J. R.(1985)。Critical literacy: challenging the assumptions of the mainstream。  new window
25.Lankshear, C.(1999)。Digital rhetorics: Literacies and technologies in classrooms-current practices and future directions。  new window
26.Lankshear, C. & Knoble, M.(2005)。Digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education, Opening Plenary Address to ITU Conference Oslo, Norway。  new window
27.Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M(1998)。Critical literacy and new technologies。  new window
28.Lewis, J.(2006)。News and the empowerment of citizens。  new window
29.Meijer, I. C(2007)。The paradox of popularity: How young people experience the news。  new window
30.Silverstone, R.(2004)。Regulation, media literacy and media civics。  new window
31.Skinner, D. Gasher, M. J. & Compton, J.(2001)。Putting theory to practice: A critical approach to journalism studies。  new window
32.Switzer, L. & Ryan, M(2002)。The acceptance of critical-cultural scholarship in mass communication education。  new window
33.Wahl-Jorgensen, K.(2008)。Disgust, pleasure and the failure of the liberal democratic model。  new window
34.Warschauer, M.(1997)。A sociocultural approach to literacy and its significance for for CALL。  new window
圖書論文
1.Giroux, H. A.(1987)。Introduction: Literacy and the pedagogy of political empowerment。Literacy: Reading the word and the world。CT：South Hadley, MA：Bergin & Garvey。  new window
2.Bennett, W. L.(2008)。Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age。Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth。Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT Press)。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：373（臺灣：370，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2564847 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68357715
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上