:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運動技術測驗的合理類別設定方法研究--以重複測量單一項目測驗為例
書刊名:臺灣體育學術研究
作者:姚漢禱 引用關係
作者(外文):Yau, Han-dau
出版日期:2011
卷期:51
頁次:頁79-94
主題關鍵詞:類別設定二項分配Rasch分析運動技術測驗閾值失序Categories settingBinomial distributionRasch analysisSport skill testingDisordered thresholds
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:46
本研究的目的是發展運動技術測驗的類別設定方法,以重複測量單一項目測驗型式為例。研究對象是大學體育課興趣選項羽球班學生,編製羽球發長球測驗。研究方法分成兩個步驟實施試驗,第一個步驟記錄每一個有效長球落點的座標,利用二項分配機率設定計分類別的數量和大小。第二個步驟利用建立的計分類別進行正式施測,然後評估此方法設定的優劣。研究設定的五個區域,距離後發球線分別為:5分類別9.00公分、4分類別50.50公分、3分類別108.00公分、2分類別174.76公分、1分類別241.00公分。研究結果經Linacre(2002)的適當類別準則評價得到:六項符合準則、兩項部分符合準則、一項少部分符合準則,根據結果得到本研究結論為:發展出運動技術測驗合理類別設定的一種方法。
The purpose of the study was to develop the approach of categories setting in sport skill testing: an example of Multiple-Attempt Single-Item tests. The research objects were the students whose selection of physical education for Badminton class was to construct the long service testing of Badminton. The method of study has two-staged testing. At the first stage, we recorded each valid point of long service in the coordinates, and used binomial distribution to set quantity and size of scoring categories. At the second step, we used the constructed scoring categories to test, and then assessed setting of this method. This study set five areas of the distance between long service line: 5 scores for 9.00 cm, 4 scores for 50.50 cm, 3 scores for 108.00 cm, 2 scores for 174.67 cm, and one score for 241.00 cm. According to rule of optimizing categories in Linacre (2002), the results of the study were that the evaluation is the goodness of fitted 6 principles, partial fitted 2 principles and few fitted 1 principle. According to the results, we obtained the conclusion of this study was that we develop one of the approach of reasonable categories setting in sport skill testing.
期刊論文
1.Shaw, F.、Wright, B.、Linacre, J. M.(1992)。Disordered steps?。Rasch Measurement Transactions,6(2),225。  new window
2.Stone, M. H.、Wright, B. D.(1994)。Maximizing rating scale information。Rasch, Measurement Transactions,8(3),386。  new window
3.姚漢禱、何榮桂(19960600)。固定試做次數之運動技能測驗的適性化研究。體育研究,2,15-31。  延伸查詢new window
4.何榮桂、姚漢禱(19960100)。評分量尺模式在運動技能測驗上的應用。測驗年刊,43,141-152。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.姚漢禱、紀世清、周嵩益、姚偉哲(2008)。修訂立定跳遠發展階段觀察檢核表。國立台灣體育大學論叢,19(1),35-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lamoureux, E. L.、Pesudovs, K.、Thumboo, J.、Saw, S. M.、Wong. T. Y.(2009)。An evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Visual Functioning questionnaire (VF-11) using Rasch analysis in an Asian population。Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science,50,2607-2613。  new window
7.Lamoureux, E. L.、Tee, H. W.、Pesudovs, K.、Pallant, J. F.、Keeffe, J. E.、Rees, G.(2009)。Can clinicians use the PHQ-9 to assess depression in people with vision loss?。Optometry and Vision Science,86(2),139-145。  new window
8.Linacre, J. M.(1991)。Step disordering and rasch-tliurstone-type thresholds。Rasch Measurement Transactions,5(3),171。  new window
9.Linacre, J. M.(1999)。Category disordering vs. step (threshold) disordering。Rasch Measurement Transactions,13(1),675。  new window
10.Linacre J .M.(2001)。Category, step and threshold: definitions & disordering。Rasch Measurement Transactions,15(1),794。  new window
11.Linacre, J. M.(2002)。Understanding Rasch Measurement: Optimizing Rating Scale Categoiy Effectiveness。The Journal of Applied Measurement,3(1),85-106。  new window
12.Linacre, J. M.(2010)。Transitional categories and usefully disordered thresholds。Online Educational Research Journal,1(2)。  new window
13.Pesudovs, K.、Gothwal, V. K.、Wright, T.、Lamoureux, E. L.(2010)。Remediating serious flaws in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire。Journal Cataract Refract Surg,36,718-732。  new window
14.Siegert, R. J.、Jackson, D. M.、Tennant, A.、Turner-Stokes, L.(2010)。Factor analysis and Rasch analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview for acquired brain injury carer research。Journal Rehabilitation Medicine,42,302-309。  new window
15.Zhu, W.、Updyke, W. F.、Lewandowski, C.(1997)。Post-Hoc Rasch analysis of optimal categorization of an ordered-response scale。Journal of Outcome Measurement,1(4),286-304。  new window
會議論文
1.Chou, S. I.、Yau, H. D.(2006)。An evaluation of the assessing the development level of the standing long jump observation checklist。Hong Kong。  new window
學位論文
1.陳玟靜(2008)。桌球甲組選手正手拉球測驗之編製(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育大學(桃園)。  延伸查詢new window
2.余美儒(2009)。編製桌球甲組選手正手快帶技術測驗。國立台灣體育大學(桃園),桃園縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bond, T. G.、Fox, C. M.(2007)。Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Guieford, J. P.(1965)。Fundamental statistics in phychology and education。N.Y:McGramn-Hill。  new window
3.Larson, L. A.、Yocom, R. D.(1951)。Measurement and evaluation in physical, health, and recreation education。St. Louis, MI:C. V. Mos。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE