:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:邊陲漁村轉型的衝突--以高雄市興達港為例
書刊名:高雄師大學報. 人文與藝術類
作者:洪富峰 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Fu-feng
出版日期:2012
卷期:32
頁次:頁159-176
主題關鍵詞:衝突邊陲漁村高雄市興達港ConflictPeripheral fishing villageKaohsiungSingda port
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:202
本文以衝突為議題,企圖揭示臺灣漁村轉型所面對的特殊課題,並以極端開發案例興達港為例,探究邊陲漁村轉型的尺度斷裂問題,運用文獻整理,搭配田野觀察與訪談,嘗試提出解決問題與發展的方向與途徑。提出結論包括: 1.興達遠洋漁港是國家的飛地之港。 2.海洋上摩托車式的動力膠筏和舢舨,作為海洋與陸地往返的最佳工具,是典型地方知識的實踐,更邊陲漁村「韌性」的具像化。 3.當國家努力整備硬體設施,如果欠缺軟體和海上文化的培養,勢必跳躍過與海洋共生活的漁村世代,漁村便成為跳躍式轉型計劃的犧牲品。 4.漁業生產鏈工業化與企業化趨勢,凸顯了興達遠洋漁港整備過程中,資源競爭衝突具有跨空間尺度的現象。 5.邊陲漁村轉型計劃應兼顧經濟與文化層次。漁港建設投資額度高,期程長,一旦資本流動遲滯,很難藉市場機能迴轉至第一迴路。基此,邊陲漁村經濟轉型的方案,應具備文化轉向的特質。
This study focuses on the topic of conflicts, which are serious issues of transformation encountered by Taiwan’s peripheral fishing villages. Specifically, based on literature review and fieldwork on Singda port as the case study, this paper explores scale-rupture of developmental planning and path dependence. In conclusion, this paper suggests that (1) the nation-state as well as local-state treat Singda port as an internal enclave. (2) While motorcycles are the most mobilizing vehicle on the land, the sampan and rafts operations dominate fishing industry in Sinda area. These operations represent capability for local knowledge of fishing village. (3) The fishing village is the victim of frog-leaping developmental plans because of facilities completeness but lack of local culture merits. (4) The industrialization and commercialization of fishing industry reveal a typical spatial conflict of resource competition in case of Singda ocean-going port. And, (5) any transforming project of peripheral fishing village needs to combine economic purposes and cultural character, in order to avoid abatement of second capital circuit. Thus, transforming projects of peripheral fishing village should take the characteristic of culture transformation into consideration.
期刊論文
1.劉祥熹、莊慶達、邱信達(20011200)。漁村社區發展與建設績效之模糊多準則評估。農業經濟叢刊,7(1),63-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Mansfield, B.(2001)。Thinking Through Scale: The Role of State Governance in Globalizing North Pacific Fisheries。Environment and Planning A,33,1807-1827。  new window
3.Ribera-Fumaz, Ramon(2009)。From urban political economy to cultural political economy: rethinking culture and economy in and beyond the urban。Progress in Human Geography,33(4),447-465。  new window
4.Cox, K. R.、Mair, A.(1988)。Locality and community in the politics of local economic development。Annals of the Association of American Geographers,78(2),307-325。  new window
5.Ball, R.(1996)。Local sensitivities and representation of peripherality。Journal of Transport Geography,4(1),27-36。  new window
6.De Groot, R.(2006)。Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes。Landscape and Urban Planning,75(3/4),175-186。  new window
7.Hapke, H.(2001)。Petty Traders, Gender, and Development in a South Indian Fishery。Economic Geography,77(3),225-249。  new window
8.Harvey, D.(1978)。The urban process under capitalism。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2(1),101-131。  new window
9.Hayter, R.、Barnes, T. J.、Bradsha, M. J.(2003)。Relocating resource peripheries to the core of economic geography's theorizing: rationale and agenda。Area,35(1),15-23。  new window
10.Hoyle, B. S.(1989)。The Port-City Interface: Trends, Problems and Examples。Geoforum,20(4),429-435。  new window
11.Lee, S-W.、Song, D-W.、Ducruet, C.(2008)。A tale of Asia’s world ports: The spatial evolution in global hub port cities。Geoforum,39(1),372-385。  new window
12.Norcliffe, G.、Bassett, K.、Hoare, T.(1996)。The emergence of postmodernism on the waterfront: geographical perspective on changing relationships。Journal of Transport Geography,4(2),123-134。  new window
13.Olivier, D.、Slack, B.(2006)。Rethinking the Port。Environment and Planning A,38(8),1409-1427。  new window
14.Peuhkure, T.(2002)。Knowledge and interpretation in environmental conflict fish farming and eutrophication in the Archipelago Sea, SW Finland。Landscape and Urban Planning,61(1),157-168。  new window
15.Slack, B.、Wang, J.(1991)。The challenge of peripheral ports: An asian perspective。Geojournal,56(2),159-166。  new window
16.Van der Dunk, A.、Gret-Regamey, A.、Dalang, T.、Hersperger, A.(2011)。Defining a typology of peri-urban land-use conflicts- A case study from Switzerland。Landscape and Urban Planning,101(1),149-156。  new window
17.Wang, J.、Olivier, D.(2006)。Port -FEZ bundles as spaces of global articulation: the case of Tianjin, China。Environment and Planning A,38(8),1487-1503。  new window
18.Wiegmans, B.、Louw, E.(2011)。Changing port-city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface?。Journal of Transport Geography,19(4),575-583。  new window
研究報告
1.高雄縣政府(1985)。興達港遠洋漁港鄰近地區留設港區未來發展用地評估規劃報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.高雄縣政府(1996)。高雄縣興達海洋文化園區開發計畫:第二期規劃期末報告。高雄:財團法人台灣漁業技術顧問社。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊慶達、劉祥熹(1997)。臺灣漁村社區發展與重建關鍵因素之研究。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺灣省政府漁業局(1997)。興達漁港漁港計畫書擬訂規劃報告。  延伸查詢new window
5.臺灣省政府漁業局(1999)。興達漁港計畫書。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.何立德(2005)。漁村社區總體營造規劃與經營策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李明諺(2006)。漁村社區轉型策略研究之探討:以高雄縣茄萣鄉為例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王宏元(2010)。漁村發展模式之建構--一個多個案研究(碩士論文)。明志科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭慶清(2006)。漁港轉型為觀光遊憩發展策略規劃之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.邱文彥(2003)。海岸管理:理論與實務。臺北市:五南出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.胡興華(200301)。台灣的漁業。新北市:遠足文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.尹章華、凌鳳儀(1998)。海事行政法概要。臺北:文笙書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡興華(2003)。台灣地區漁港基本資料(下):高雄縣漁港。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.高雄市政府海洋局(2011)。興達漁港整體發展規劃及漁港計畫修正。高雄市:城都國際開發規劃管理顧問有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.薛雅惠(1997)。高雄縣產業:漁業篇。  延伸查詢new window
7.Mansfield, B.(2011)。“Modern”industrial fisheries and the crisis of overfishing。Global Political Ecology。Routledge。  new window
其他
1.趙昌平,杜善良(2011)。監察院調查報告,派查字號:0990800839。  延伸查詢new window
2.交通部(2010)。推動遊艇活動發展方案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院農委會漁業署(2009)。海岸新生之漁港疏浚及多功能漁港開發規劃。  延伸查詢new window
4.高雄市議會公報初稿(2011)。農林業務質詢及答覆。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE