臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：The Fourth Estate Under Siege: The Making of a Democratic Institution and Its Pressing Challenges
書刊名：National Taiwan University Law Review
作者：王明禮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Ming-li
出版日期：2012
卷期：7:2
頁次：頁385-422
主題關鍵詞：新聞媒體；新聞自由；第四權；媒體集中化；網際網路；News media；Freedom of the press；Fourth estate；Media concentration；Internet
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:33
摘 要 廿一世紀的新聞媒體可謂四面楚歌。一方面，願意付費閱讀、收 聽或收視的消費者越來越少，而搶食廣告大餅的競爭者又越來越多， 使多數媒體都在財務上十分吃緊。在另一方面，近年來社會各界又對 新聞報導品質的不斷下滑迭有怨言。一個本來在現代民主社會裡扮演 重要角色、甚至因此博得第四權封號的關鍵機制，似乎正在吾人的眼 前逐漸生鏽、退化當中。 究竟新聞媒體在當世面臨的是何等困境及其成因，是本文企圖探 索的課題。首先，本文將描繪新聞媒體與民主社會的理想關係──究 竟新聞自由與由此而來的各種保障甚至特權，是為了讓新聞媒體扮演 好什麼樣的角色，而社會大眾對此等角色的期待又是如何。其次的章 節將從新聞媒體在十九世紀從一個普通產業，逐步發展出其公益性格 的這段過程，指出促成此等蛻變的幾個關鍵決策與環境因素，以及因 此而形成的潛在危險。再其次，本文將說明過去二十多年來的兩項重 要發展──解除管制之浪潮與資通訊科技之發達──如何促使前述 的潛在危險浮上檯面。最後，本文將剖析因為前述的發展，在當前的 環境下，對新聞媒體主要民主機能的發揮，究竟有那些主要的障礙。 廿一世紀的新聞媒體可謂四面楚歌。一方面，願意付費閱讀、收聽或 收視的消費者越來越少，而搶食廣告大餅的競爭者又越來越多，使多 數媒體都在財務上十分吃緊。在另一方面，近年來社會各界又對新聞 報導品質的不斷下滑迭有怨言。一個本來在現代民主社會裡扮演重要 角色、甚至因此搏得第四權封號的關鍵機制，似乎正在吾人的眼前逐 漸生鏽、退化當中。
ABSTRACT The press—or the media in its current incarnation—is under siege in the twenty-first century. Financially most firms are heavily stretched, due to ever increasing competition for advertising revenue as well as gradual but unmistakable decline in paid subscription. Social-politically they are often criticized for slipping journalistic standard and professional ethics. The “Fourth Estate” as we know it—the vital institution in a democratic society that provides “organized, expert scrutiny of government”—is waning before our eyes. This article aims to answer why the health of the news media industry is deteriorating. It starts with a concise profile of the idealized press, one that could live up to the epithet “Fourth Estate.” It would also explain what legal protection and other perquisites afforded to such a precious institution, as well as what is expected in return. What follows is a series of historical accounts intended to highlight a few critical decisions that, together with stages of social change, helped the press grow into its free and uninhibited self. The subsequent sections shift the spotlight to an undercurrent that has lurked from day one—the unease of entrusting a vital public service to private media. Social and economic development in the lasttwo decades—thanks to, among other things, media ownership deregulation and growing popularity of the Internet—has further exacerbated the situation. It has been a strenuous battle for public interest-minded news media to stay true to its democratic commitment.
期刊論文
1.Barron, J. A.(1967)。Access to the press：A new First Amendment right。Harvard Law Review，80，1641-1678。  new window
2.Anderson, David A.(2002)。Freedom of the press。Texas Law Review，80，429-530。  new window
3.Djankov, Simeon、McLiesh, Caralee、Nenova, Tatiana、Shleifer, Andrei(2003)。Who Owns the Media?。Journal of Law and Economics，46(2)，341-382。  new window
4.Lange, D.(1975)。The Speech and Press Clauses。UCLA Law Review，23，77-119。  new window
5.Anderson, D. A.(1983)。The Origins of the Press Clause。University of California Law Review，30，455-541。  new window
6.Baker, C. E.(2002)。Media Concentration- Giving Up on Democracy。Florida Law Review，54，839-919。  new window
7.Barron, J. A.(2008)。Access Reconsidered。George Washington Law Review，76，826-844。  new window
8.Bezanson, R. P.(1999)。The Developing Law of Editorial Judgment。Nebraska Law Review，78，754-857。  new window
9.Candeub, A.(2008)。Media Ownership Regulation, the First Amendment, and Democracy’s Future。U.C. Davis Law Review，41，1547-1611。  new window
10.Dvorkin, J. A.(2003)。Reporting on Terrorism: Choosing Our Words Carefully。University of Richmond Law Review，37，811-817。  new window
11.Enrique, A.(2009)。Media Ownership Regulation: A Comparative Perspective。Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law，37，421-468。  new window
12.Goldstein, B. D.(1992)。Confidentiality and Dissemination of Personal Information: An Examination of State Laws Governing Data Protection。Emory Law Journal，41，1185-1236。  new window
13.Goodale, J. C.、Kiernan, J.S.、Feigelson, J.、Bierbauer, E.、Suh, J.S.、Murphy, J. D.(2010)。Reporter’s Privilege。Practising Law Institute，1027，173-757。  new window
14.Goodale, J. C.、Kiernan, J.S.、Feigelson, J.、Bierbauer, E.、Suh, J. S.、Murphy, J. D.(2010)。Recent Developments 2009-2010。Practising Law Institute，1027，151-170。  new window
15.Goodale, J. C.、Kiernan, J. S.、Feigelson, J.、Bierbauer, E.、Murphy, J. D.(2010)。Reporter’s Privilege: Recent Developments 2010-2011。Practising Law Institute，1068，223-237。  new window
16.Lee, E.(2008)。Freedom of the Press 2.0.。Georgia Law Review，42，309-406。  new window
17.Lemley, M. A.、Lessig, L.(2001)。The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era。University of California Law Review，48，925-972。  new window
18.Magarian, G. P.(2004)。The First Amendment, the Public-Private Distinction, and Nongovernmental Suppression of Wartime Political Debate。George Washington Law Review，73，101-172。  new window
19.Smith, B. A.(1997)。The Siren’s Song: Campaign Finance regulation and the First Amendment。Journal of Law & Policy，6，1-43。  new window
20.Stewart, P.(1999)。Or of the Press。Hastings Law Journal，50，705-710。  new window
圖書
1.Amar, Akhil Reed(1998)。The Bill of Rights: Creation and reconstruction。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
2.Zittrain, Jonathan(2008)。The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
3.Battelle, John(2005)。The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture。New York：Portfolio。  new window
4.Friedman, Lawrence M.(1998)。American Law: an introduction。New York：W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
5.Kovach, B.、Rosenstiel, T.(2001)。The elements of journalism--what newspeople should know and the public should expect。New York：Three Rivers Press。  new window
6.Pool, I. S.(1983)。Technologies of Freedom。Cambridge, MA：Belknap Harvard。  new window
7.Hafner, Katie、Lyon, Matthew(1996)。Where Wizards Stay Up Late: the Origins of the Internet。New York：Simon & Schuster。  new window
8.Lessig, Lawrence(2001)。The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World。Random House, Inc.。  new window
9.Sunstein, Cass R.(2007)。Republic.com 2.0。Princeton University Press。  new window
10.Bowman, J. S.(2000)。Columbia Chronologies of Asian History and Culture。New York, NY：Columbia University Press。  new window
11.Brian, W.(1998)。Media Technology and Society。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
12.Briggs, A.、Burke, P.(2005)。A Social History of the Media。Malden, MA：Polity。  new window
13.Carlyle, T.(1841)。On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History。London：Oxford University Press。  new window
14.Emshwiller, J. R.、Smith, R.(2003)。24 Days: How Two Wall Street Journal Reporters Uncovered the Lies that Destroyed Faith in Corporate America。New York, NY：Collins Business。  new window
15.Friedman, L. M.(2005)。A History of American Law。New York, NY：Simon & Schuster。  new window
16.Humphreys, P. J.(1996)。Mass Media and Media Policy in Western Europe。New York, NY：Manchester University Press。  new window
17.Kessler, A.(2005)。How We Got Here: A Slightly Irreverent History of Technology and Markets。New York, NY：Collins。  new window
18.Lessig, L.(2004)。Free Culture。New York, NY：Penguin Press。  new window
19.Starr, P.(2004)。The Creation of the Media。New York, NY：Basic Books。  new window
20.Steigleman, W. A.(1971)。The Newspaperman and the Law。Westport, CT：Greenwood Press。  new window
其他
1.(1919)。Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616。  new window
2.Alexander, A.(2009)。The Stumbles that Led to an Ethics Blunder. Washington Post，http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/11/AR2009071100290.html。  new window
3.(1987)。Ark. Writers’ Project, Inc. v. Ragland, 481 U.S. 221。  new window
4.(1998)。Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes, 523 U.S. 666。  new window
5.(1945)。Associated Press v. U.S. 326 U.S. 1。  new window
6.(1972)。Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665。  new window
7.Brenner, M.(199605)。The Man Who Knew Too Much. Vanity Fair，http://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/archive/1996/05/wigand199605。  new window
8.(2009)。Cablevision Sys. Corp. v. FCC, 570 F.3d 83。  new window
9.(1829)。Clayton v. Stone, 5 F.Cas. 999。  new window
10.(1973)。Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee, 412 U.S. 94。  new window
11.Djrective 2010/13/EU (Audiovisual Media Service Directive), art. 11。  new window
12.(1978)。FCC v. Pacifica Found., 438 U.S. 726。  new window
13.(2007)。Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)。  new window
14.(1936)。Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233。  new window
15.Kaplan, D. A.(20060918)。Suspicions and Spies in Silicon Valley，http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2006/09/17/suspicions-and-spies-in-silicon-valley.print.html.。  new window
16.Lefty(20080226)。Collaborative Micro-Filtering，http://www.mylifestartingup.com/2008/02/collaborative-micro-filtering.html。  new window
17.(1974)。Miami Herald Pub.lishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241。  new window
18.Miller, C. C.(20100903)。YouTube Ads Turn Videos Into Revenue，http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/03/technology/03youtube.html.。  new window
19.(1983)。Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minn. Comm’r of Revenue, 460 U.S. 575。  new window
20.(1943)。National Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 190。  new window
21.(1971)。New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713。  new window
22.(1964)。New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254。  new window
23.Pub. L. No. 73-416。  new window
24.(2000)。Radio-Television News Dirs. Ass'n v. FCC, 229 F.3d 269。  new window
25.(1969)。Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367。  new window
26.Rich, F.(19960203)。Smoking Guns at ‘60 Minutes’。  new window
27.(1992)。Schurz Commc’ns, Inc. v. FCC, 982 F.2d 1043。  new window
28.Sokolove, M.(20090809)。What’s a Big City Without a Newspaper?，http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/magazine/09Newspaper-t.html.。  new window
29.(1996)。Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56。  new window
30.(1997)。Turner Broad. Sys., Inc. v. FCC, 520 U.S. 180。  new window
31.U. S. Constitution, Art. I, § 8, cl. 7.。  new window
32.(1982)。U.S. v. AT&T, 552 F. Supp. 131。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：238（臺灣：222，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2272939 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68071120
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上