:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同背景干擾對桌球正手攻球技能表現之影響
書刊名:屏東科大體育學刊
作者:莊紋娟 引用關係丁如意林耀豐 引用關係
作者(外文):Chuang, Wen-chuanTing, Ju-yiLin, Yaw-feng
出版日期:2013
卷期:2
頁次:頁43-57
主題關鍵詞:背景干擾技能獲得技能保留正手攻球Contextual interferenceSkill obtainmentSkill retentionForehand
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:17
本研究旨在探討不同背景干擾程度的練習方式對桌球基本技能正手攻球學習之影響(正手攻球、反手推球、正手發平擊球)。本研究採實驗研究法,研究對象是以私立中國文化大學體育選修桌球男女學生共 80位,其皆從未接受桌球訓練經驗。以隨機分派方式分配為控制組、低背景干擾組、中背景干擾組和高背景干擾組。施以五週 15次,每次 30分鐘的實驗操作,並於實驗開始前、結束後與結束後 7天實行前測、後測與保留測驗。研究所得之數據以多變項共變數分析來檢定,若達顯著差異便以杜凱法事後比較再次檢驗之。本研究得到以下兩點研究建議,一、不同背景干擾的練習方式對桌球基本技能正手攻球,在測驗成績有增進其表現的效果存在。二、不同背景干擾的練習方式對桌球基本技能正手攻球,在外顯動作有保留其表現的效果存在。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of different contextual interference practice on table tennis forehand (forehand, backhand, and forehand stroke) basic skill. An experimental study was used. Subjects of the research were 80 students of Private Chinese Culture University, who had never received tennis table training. All subjects are randomly divided into control group, low contextual interference group, medium contextual interference group, and high contextual interference group. The experiment was implemented in a 5-week session, in total 15 times, and with each time 30 minutes. Before, right after, and 7 days after the experiment would relatively implement pretest, post-test, and retention test. The statistics were analyzed using MONCOVA. If the difference is too significant, the test of Tukey’s HSD would be applied.In this study, it could be concluded into two following suggestions: 1.The table tennis forehand basic skill between different contextual interference practices appeared advanced trend on the testing scores. 2.The table tennis forehand basic skill between different contextual interference practices retained the performance on the movements of outward appearance.
期刊論文
1.邱仕友(1988)。桌球運動技術的研究。復興崗學報,39,417-441。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡佳蓉(1997)。三種練習法的背景干擾對運動技能學習之影響。中華體育,11,97〜104。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Jarus,TGoverover, Y(1999)。Effect of contextual interference in and age on acquisition, retention, and transfer of motor skills。Perceptual and Motor Skms,88,437-447。  new window
4.Shea, J. B、Morgan, R. A.(1979)。Contextual interference effect on the acquisition, retention and transfer of a motor skill。Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Learning and Memory,5,179-178。  new window
5.Wulf, G.、Hob.,M、Prine,W.。Instruction for motor learning : Differential effect of internal versus external focus of attention。Journal of Motor Behavior,30,169-197。  new window
6.Hebert, E. P.、Landin, D.、Solmon, M. A.(1996)。Practice schedule effects on the performance and learning of low-and high-skilled students: An applied study。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,67(1),52-58。  new window
7.Wegman, E.(1999)。Contextual interference effects on the acquisition and retention of foundamental motor skills.。Perceptual and Motor Skills,88,182-187。  new window
8.蕭存沂(19960200)。桌球運動的基本技術分析。大專體育,24,116-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.李玉蘋(19970500)。情境干擾對三種倒立技能的學習效果。臺大體育學報,1,169-194。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Hall, K. G.、Domingues, D. A.、Cavazos, R.(1994)。Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players。Perceptual and Motor Skills,78(3),835-841。  new window
11.Magill, R. A.、Hall, K. G.(1990)。A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition。Human Movement Science,9(3-5),241-289。  new window
12.蔡貞雄(20011000)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程體育教學的特質。學校體育,11(6)=66,25-34。  延伸查詢new window
13.Brady, F.(1997)。Contextual interference and teaching golf skills。Perceptual and Motor Skills,84,347-350。  new window
14.Pollock, B. J.、Lee, T. D.(1997)。Contextual interference effects in children and adults。Perceptual and Motor Skills,84,851-858。  new window
15.Smith, P. J.(2002)。Applying contextual interference to snowboarding skills。Perceptual and Motor Skills,95,999-1005。  new window
會議論文
1.黃國義(1994)。學校體育内容教學之規劃1,179-185。  延伸查詢new window
2.Yong, J. Y.(2003)。The effect of contextual interference and expertise on Putting。Seoul, Korea:Kookmin University。173-176。  new window
學位論文
1.李鴻恩(2004)。不背景干擾與回饋型態對籃球投籃技能學習之影響(-)。國立台東大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.余姿慧(2009)。不同背景干擾對國小低年級學童樂樂棒球擲準表現之探討(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳岣蓁(2012)。不同背景干擾對國小三年級學女童樂樂棒球打擊學習之影響(未出版碩士論文)(-)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉若山(2010)。不同背景干擾與性別及測驗別對國小高年級學童樂樂棒球擲準技能學習之影響(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.鍾志凡(2008)。不同背景干擾練習對國小學童投籃技能之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.莊紋娟(2004)。不同背景干擾對桌球基本技能學習之影響(碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.林耀豐(2003)。工作限制下技能水準差異和訓練對網球正手拍技能表現的影響(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Richard,E.M.(1987)。運動學習程式。台北市:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2003)。國民教育階段九年一貫健康與體育領域暫行課程綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇丕仁(2003)。現代乒乓球運動教學與訓練。北京市:人民體育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡繼玲、吳修文、蔡學玲、陶志翔、唐建軍(1999)。兵乓球。北京:北京體育大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Singer, R. N.(1980)。Motor learning and human performance。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
6.簡素琤、楊志和(1989)。運動學習。桃園縣:國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.Mayer, Richard E.、林清山(1991)。教育心理學--認知取向。臺北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.林清和(1996)。運動學習程式學。臺北市:文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.張春興、林清山(1989)。教育心理學。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Batting, W. F.(1972)。Intratask interference as a source of facilitation in transfer and retention。Topics in learning and performance。New York:Academic Press。  new window
2.Fitts, P.(1962)。Factors is complex skill training。Training research and education。Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE