:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:理解式教學法在桌球教學之研究
書刊名:興大體育學刊
作者:鄭金昌 引用關係張紅玉盛世慧
作者(外文):Cheng, Chin-changChang, Hung-yuSheng, Shih-hui
出版日期:2011
卷期:11
頁次:頁149-158
主題關鍵詞:傳統式教學客觀技能情意表現Traditional teaching methodObjective skillsAffective reaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:64
目的:本研究旨在探討理解式球類教學與傳統式教學應用在大學一、二年級選修桌球課學生的客觀技能與情意表現差異比較。以東海大學九十八學年選修桌球課四班197位同學為對象。方法:本研究採準實驗設計,以隨機方式將四班分為理解式球類教學兩組(實驗組97人),傳統式教學兩組(控制組100人),進行八週13小時教學實驗。結果:兩組學生參與教學前後的客觀技能比較,皆呈現出教學後學習成效高於教學前,且達顯著差異。兩組教學後測的客觀技能進步成績做比較,則呈現出理解式球類教學進步高於傳統式教學,且達顯著差異。情意表現方面,兩組學生的情意表現並沒有因參與不同教學法後,形成顯著差異。
The purpose of this study was to compare effects of teaching methods on the objective skills and affective reactions of college students who took the elective of table tennis classes. Two teaching methods were compared, namely, the teaching game for understanding (TGfU) and the traditional teaching method (TTM). Experiment was performed over a 8 weeks/16 hours teaching period. Four table tennis classes (which included 197 volunteers) from Tunghai university in 2009 school year were divided into two groups randomly. The TGfU group has 97 students, and TTM group has 100 students in total. Our analysis revealed that both groups showed significant progress in their objective skills. However, TGfU showed superior efficiency over TTM. On the other hand, no differences were observed on the affective reactions for both groups.
期刊論文
1.盛世慧、鄭金昌、張紅玉、林春梅(2011)。理解式球類教學法應用在大學籃球課教學之研究。休閒運動保健學報,1,10-18。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Turner, A. P.、Martinek, T. J.(1992)。A comparative analysis of two model for teachinggames (technique approach and game-centered [tactical focus] approach)。International Journal of Physical Education,29(4),15-31。  new window
3.McPherson, S. L.、French, K. E.(1991)。Changes in cognitive state and motor skill in tennis。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,13,26-41。  new window
4.溫麗香、林玉瓊(20031200)。合作學習教學法在學校舞蹈教學上的應用。大專體育,69,21-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Turner, A. P.(1996)。Myth or Reality。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance,67(4),46-48。  new window
6.Turner, A. P.、Martinek, T. J.(1999)。An investigation into teaching games for understanding: Effects on skill, knowledge and game play。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,70(3),286-296。  new window
7.廖智倩、闕月清(20080600)。中學師生對理解式球類教學實施知覺之探討。臺中教育大學學報. 教育類,22(1),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Bell, T.(2003)。An investigation into the use of thinking skills to understanding and employ tactical knowledge in the context of a practical team problem solving activity。Oral session presented at the 2nd International Conference: Teaching and Physical Education for Understanding。Melbourne, Australia。  new window
學位論文
1.林俐伶(2009)。理解式球類教學應用於國小六年級學童情意表現之研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.施博隆(2005)。理解式教學與傳統式教學對國小學童樂樂棒球擲準學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳其達(2007)。理解式球類教學對國小五年級學生排球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.顏欣加(2002)。傳統教學與媒體教學對龍舟知識及動作技能學習成就之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.龔雅慈(2007)。理解式教學法在合作學習情境下對羽球運動技能學習成效與態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
6.呂秀美(2006)。理解式球類教學法對國中學生巧固球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.李世雄(2007)。理解式球類教學法與傳統教學法對高中生足球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.邱奕銓(2005)。傳統與理解式教學法對高職學生籃球學習效果比較之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.游淑霞(2006)。理解式球類教學法對高中生合球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃志成(2004)。理解式球類教學對國小六年級學生羽球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡宗達(2004)。理解式球類教學法與技能取向球類教學法比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.林本源(2002)。編製中小學學生體育態度量表之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.邱仕友(1987)。桌球運動技術測驗之研究。新北市:覺園。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Turner, A. P.(1993)。A model for working with students with varying knowledge structures。the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance。Washington, DC:National conference。  new window
3.廖玉光(2002)。球類教學--領會教學法。香港:香港教育學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.Butler, J.、Griffin, L.、Lombardo, B.、Nastasi, R.(2003)。Teaching Games for Understanding in physical education and sport: An international perspective。Reston, Virginia:National Association of Sport and Physical Education。  new window
5.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE