:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以接受美學視角探析〈公無渡河〉
書刊名:韓國學報
作者:董達 引用關係
出版日期:2013
卷期:24
頁次:頁138-156
主題關鍵詞:公無渡河箜篌引擬作接受美學期待視野Gong Wu Du HeReception AestheticsHorizon of expectationIndeterminacy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:18
〈公無渡河〉在中、韓文學史上,均受到極大的重視,且以此為題的文人擬作詩從南北朝到清朝,甚至在朝鮮,亦不知凡幾。此一現象顯示此一跨越國度的詩歌所具有的特殊性與重要地位,以及其在兩國文人心目中深遠的影響力。由於〈公無渡河〉原詩與背景故事存在諸多疑義,以往學界對其之研究多侷限在作品的作者、典據、創作年代、創作地域、故事背景、結構、象徵意義與文化內涵等方面,而未能把研究領域由原詩擴大到文學接受活動。〈公無渡河〉原作存在的諸多疑義,意味著文本充滿“未定性”或“空白點”。就接受美學的觀點而言,這些“未定性”或“空白點”具備招喚的功能,它會不斷地喚起、刺激讀者的期待視野,並在接受的過程中,經由想像、修正與確立,去填補文本中未定的空白,而歷代的擬作詩正可說是原詩在動態傳播接受的過程中,被歷代文人不斷建立、改變、修正、再建立期待視野的結果。同時,由於期待視野會隨著不同時代、不同族群或不同生活環境的讀者而有不同意義。因之,本研究亦就原詩與不同時代擬作詩的縱向面(歷時性),以及同一時代擬作詩的橫向面(共時性)進行比較分析,以藉此觀察不同時代的期待視野變化發展的軌跡,及其在同一時代的接受情形。
The poem ”Gong Wu Du He” in China and Korea's literary history is subject to great attention; also, the poem has been used as the theme with numerous poets from the Southern and Northern Dynasties to the Qing Dynasty, and even in Chosun. This phenomenon indicates that the poem, with its characteristics and importance, has no boundaries and has its far-reaching influence to China and Korea's poets. However, as the original poem and background of the story left many queries, the related literary studies are often limited to the author, origins, the time and place of production, background, structure, symbolic meaning and cultural connotations of the work. Scholars so far have failed to extend the study of the poem to literary reception activities. There are a lot of the original doubts of ”Gong Wu Du He”, which mean the text is full of ”indeterminacy” or ”blanks”. As the reception aesthetics' point of view, these ”indeterminacy” or ”blanks” have called upon by the function. It will continue to arouse and stimulate the reader's horizon of expectation, and in the process of receiving, through imagination, correction and confirmation, to the uncertain text to fill the blank. That is to say, all poems are the produced in process of dynamic broadcasting, through re-establishment, correction, revision, and rebuilding of the horizon of expectation by ancient poets for generations. Besides, the horizon of expectation would have different meanings in different time, ethnic groups, and environment. Therefore, this study will use the original poem and the simulate poetry of different times of the vertical surface (diachronic), and horizontal surface (synchronic) for a comparative analysis in order to observe different times, which are the changes of horizon of expectation and the track of development, and its acceptance of the situation within the same era.
期刊論文
1.王莉(2006)。《箜篌引》的音樂屬類考論。蘭州學刊,2006(9),77-78。  延伸查詢new window
2.周英雄(19811100)。試就「公無渡河」論文學與人生的關係。中外文學,10(6),20-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李岩(2004)。朝鮮古代名謠《箜篌引》存疑續考。東疆學刊,2004(4),12-16。  延伸查詢new window
4.李炬(1999)。朝鮮古代漢文詩《箜篌引》與漢文化。青海民族大學學報(教育科學版),1999(3),47-49。  延伸查詢new window
5.胡大雷(2008)。從《焦氏易林》占辭看 "公無渡河" 的早期影響與原型。廣西師范大學學報 (哲學社會科學版),2008(3),1-5。  延伸查詢new window
6.宮月(2009)。《公無渡河》研究。忻州師范學院學報,2009(1),17-20。  延伸查詢new window
7.許輝勳(1983)。樂府詩 "箜篌引" 研究新探。延邊大學學報 (社會科學版),1983(2),60-65。  延伸查詢new window
8.葛桂錄、陳冰(1996)。人類困境的基型--《公無渡河》與《創世紀•始祖犯罪》比較讀解。淮陰師範學院學報 (哲學社會科學版),1996(3),15-18。  延伸查詢new window
9.董達(1990)。公無渡河考。韓國言語文學,28,313-329。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉秀麗(2004)。從典型情緒的雙向張力看公無渡河的審美價值。美與時代,2004(10),74-75。  延伸查詢new window
11.김성기(2004)。공후引의 作家에 對한 研究。古詩歌研究,13,75-94。  延伸查詢new window
12.金星洙(2007)。史記를 통해 본 公無渡河歌의 작품 배경 位置考。대동문화연구,60。  延伸查詢new window
13.金榮洙(1998)。「公無渡河歌」新解釋: '白首狂夫' 의 정체와 '被髮提壺' 의 의미를 중 심으로。韓國詩歌研究,3。  延伸查詢new window
14.성기옥(2004)。문학사의 「공무도하가」와 시인의 「공무도하가」。현대시학,36(7)=424,198-212。  延伸查詢new window
15.김정주(1997)。공후인 研究。인문과학연구,19,71-86。  延伸查詢new window
16.변유유(2006)。〈공무도하가〉연구。경상어문,12,193-218。  延伸查詢new window
17.서수생(1961)。공후引新攷。어문학,7,3-30。  延伸查詢new window
18.성기옥(1989)。〈公無渡河歌〉형성의 역사적 배경。울산어문논집,5,103-158。  延伸查詢new window
19.이해산(1995)。早期의 文獻資料로 부터 본 《공후인》。목원어문학,13,25-86。  延伸查詢new window
20.이영태(2007)。「공무도하가」의 배경설화에 나타난 광부처의 행동。민족문학사연구,33,110-128。  延伸查詢new window
21.이완형(1993)。공무도하가와 제망매가의 만가적 성격에 대하여。어문연구,24,167-185。  new window
22.유경환(1988)。공무도하가에 나타난 물(水)의 상징적 의미와 기능。어문연구,26(1)=97,148-164。  new window
23.양재연(1953)。공무도하가(公無渡河歌) -공후인- 소고(小考)。국어국문학,5,8-9。  延伸查詢new window
24.한석수(1980)。공무도하가고。尚州農蠶専門大學論文集,19。  延伸查詢new window
25.최태호(2003)。공무도하가 연구。인문사회과학논문집,7(2)。  new window
26.최두식(1982)。시경과 공후인: 물의 상징적 의미를 중심으로。國語國文學 (東亞大學),5。  延伸查詢new window
27.조기영(1996)。<公無渡河歌>연구에 있어서 열가지 쟁점。목원어문학,14,61-105。  延伸查詢new window
28.李癸雲(20031100)。論「公無渡河」在現代詩中的原型意義。臺灣詩學學刊,2,9-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.黃景進(19881000)。永恒的悲劇:「公無渡河」的結構與象徵意義。國文天地,4(5)=41,57-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.로버트 C.홀럽저、최상규(1999)。수용미학의 이론。서울:예림기획。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fokkema, Douwe、Ibsch, Elrud、袁鶴翔(1987)。二十世紀文學理論。臺北:書林出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Jauss, Hans-Robert、Holub, Robert C.、周寧、金元浦、滕守堯(1987)。接受美學與接受理論。遼寧人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.文淵閣四庫全書電子版,http://v3.skqs.com。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.楊牧(1987)。公無渡河。傳統的與現代的。台北:洪範書店。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE