臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：教室中幼兒的撒嬌事件簿
書刊名：民生論叢
作者：林慧芬 引用關係／戴美姿
作者(外文)：Lin, Hui-fen／Tai, Mei-zi
出版日期：2013
卷期：9
頁次：頁21-52
主題關鍵詞：撒嬌；依愛；依附；自主；連結；Sajiao；Amae；Autonomy；Attachment；Relatedness
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:32
本研究的目的為：（1）討論不同年齡、性別幼兒撒嬌事件的概況。（2）描述幼兒撒嬌的類型。（3）分析幼兒園中幼兒撒嬌對象、行為、目的與對象回應間的關聯。本研究以時間取樣觀察北市一幼兒園大中小班幼兒撒嬌發生的頻率；再以事件取樣錄影三班幼兒所發生的撒嬌事件。從中選擇撒嬌次數最多的八位幼兒做為分析的焦點。錄影轉成逐字稿後依撒嬌對象、行為、目的、對象回應進行編碼與計次，以卡方檢定其關聯性。另訪談中班兩位老師了解幼兒的撒嬌行為與同儕關係。結果如下：（1）中、小班比大班的撒嬌頻率較高，顯示當兒童年齡漸長在教室的撒嬌行為漸少。再者，幼兒撒嬌的頻率並無顯著性別差異。大中小班不論男女，最常見的撒嬌目的皆是情感性。（2）幼兒撒嬌的類型依撒嬌目的分為情感和操弄型，每型依撒嬌的運用技巧得宜與否分為有技巧和無技巧。（3）情感的撒嬌目的比操弄和引起注意顯著容易被接受；幼兒對老師的撒嬌目的偏向操弄與情感，對同儕則偏向引起注意；幼兒傾向對能接受撒嬌者或比自己有權力、喜歡的人撒嬌，顯示撒嬌的施者與受者間微妙的情感和權力關係。本研究論述幼兒撒嬌的樣貌及撒嬌在個人和社會層面可能文化含意，提供幼教工作者參考。
The objectives of this study are three: 1). To discuss gender and age differences of preschoolers' sajiao events. 2). To discuss children's sajiao patterns. 3). To understand occurrence of children's sajiao in classrooms, including to whom they do sajiao, the behavior per see, their purpose of doing sajiao, response from whom they do sajiao to and relevance between these four categories.Time Sampling was adopted to observe frequency of sajiao from children at three to five-year-old class in a private kindergarten in Taipei. Event Sampling was adopted to tape sajiao that occurred in those classes. Eight children of the most sajiao frequencies and with various patterns were chosen as the focus of analysis. After the taped data is transcribed, it was coded based on ”sajiao subject”, ”sajiao behavior”, ”purpose of sajiao” and ”response from the subject”, relevance between all of which is examined in Chi-square. Also, two teachers were interviewed to understand children's sajiao behavior and peer relations. The study results are as follows:1. Compares to 5-year-old, 4 and 3-year-old have more sajiao behaviors. It indicates that when a child gets older, his sajiao behavors may be less. The gender difference on preschoolers' sajiao frequency is not significant.2. Children's sajiao types can be categorized as ”affective” and ”manipulative”.3. Different sajiao behaviors occur according to degree of closeness between children and the sajiao subject. Children's sajiao behaviors vary from purposes. Furthermore, teachers respond differently based on children's purpose of sajiao but there is no difference in response among peers.
期刊論文
1.Behrens, K. Y.(2004)。A multifaceted view of the concept of Amae: reconsidering the indigenous Japanese concept of relatedness。Human Development，47，1-27。  new window
2.Kumagai, H.(1981)。A dissection of intimacy: A study of ‘bipolar posturing’ in Japanese social interaction-amaeru and amayakasu, indulgence and deference。Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry，5，249-272。  new window
3.Rothbaum, F.、Kakinuma, M.(2004)。Amae and attachment: Security in cultural context。Human Development，47，34-39。  new window
4.Vereijken, C. M.、Riksen-Walraven, J. M.、Van Lieshout, C. F. M.(1997)。Mother-infant relationshipsmin Japan: Attachment, dependency and amae。Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology，28，442-462。  new window
5.Yamaguchi, S.(2004)。Further clarifications of the concept of Amae in relation to dependence and attachment。Human Development，47，28-33。  new window
6.Farris, Catherine S.(2000)。Cross-sex Peer Conflict and the Discursive Production of Gender in a Chinese Preschool in Taiwan。Journal of Pragmatics，32，539-568。  new window
7.Rothbaum, F.、Weisz, J.、Pott, M.、Miyake, K.、Morelli, G.(2000)。Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan。American Psychologist，55(10)，1093-1104。  new window
8.Simpson, J. A.(1990)。Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，59(5)，971-980。  new window
會議論文
1.Kim, U.、Yamaguchi, S.(1995)。Conceptual and empirical analysis of amae: Exploration into Japanese psychological space。Tokyo：Japanese Group Dynamics Association。158-159。  new window
學位論文
1.陳秀碧(1993)。中學生人際策略之研究--以建立對教師關係為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉蓁蓁(1984)。混齡編班下幼兒友伴關係之相關研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳玲玲(1991)。兒童友伴選擇、友誼概念與友誼知覺之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃于娟(1994)。性別、依附風格與自我坦露、幽默、撒嬌之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Grossmann, K.、Grossmann, K. E.、Spangler, S.、Suess, G.、Unzner, L.(1985)。Maternal sensitivity and newborn responses as related to quality of attachment in Northern Germany。Growing points of attachment theory。  new window
2.安雪莉(2011)。撒嬌，男人就吃這一套。新北市：普天出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.余竹君(2007)。不會撒嬌的女人最吃虧。家新。  延伸查詢new window
4.Azuma, H.(1996)。Two modes of cognitive socialization in Japan and the United States。Cross-Cultural Roots of Minority Child Development。Hillsdale, N.J.：Erlbaum。  new window
5.Belsky, J.(1999)。Interactional and contextual determinants of attachment security。Handbook of Attachment。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
6.DeVos, G. A.(1975)。Apprenticeship and paternalism。Modern Japanese organization and decision-making。Berkeley, CA：University of California Press。  new window
7.Johnson, F. A.(1993)。Dependency and Japanese socialization: Psychoanalytic and anthropological investigations into amae。New York：New York University Press。  new window
8.Reddy, V.、Hay, D.、Murray, L.、Trevarthen, C.(1997)。Communication in infancy: Mutual regulation of affect and attention。Infant development: Recent advances。East Sussex, UK：Psychology Press。  new window
9.Yamaguchi, S.、Ariizumi, Y.(2003)。Raw data。University of Tokyo。  new window
10.土居健郎、黃恆正(1985)。日本式的「愛」：日本人「依愛」行為的心理分析。臺北：遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.孫隆基(1993)。中國文化的深層結構。台北市：香港：唐山：集賢社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Bowlby, John(1969)。Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment。New York：Basic Books。  new window
其他
1.(2007)。成語字典辭典，http://por.tw/zip369/data_09/view.php?id=8324， 2012/10/18。  new window
2.向衛國(2007)。撒嬌文化‧撒嬌詩學‧撒嬌詩歌，http://hk.netsh.com/bbs/2218/html/tree_21273191.html， 2012/06/18。  延伸查詢new window
3.在線辭典，http://www.definition-of.net/%E5%AE%9A%E4%B9%89-%E6%92%92%E5%AC%8C， 2012/10/18。  new window
4.教育部國語推行委員會。教育部重編國語辭典，http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/， 2012/06/18。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳蒼多(20090808)。「撒嬌」沒有中譯？，http://udn.com/NEWS/main. html。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉紹銘(20090913)。「撒嬌」有沒有英譯？，http://ca8hk.wordpress.com/2009/09/13/joy-of-chinese-pretty-please/。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.van IJzendoorn, M. H.、Sagi, A.(1999)。Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions。Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications。New York：Guilford Press。  new window
2.Gao, G.、Ting-Toomey, S.、Gudykunst, W. B.(1996)。Chinese communication process。The Handbook of Chinese Psychology。Hong Kong：Oxford University Press。  new window
3.燕國材(19940000)。中國傳統文化與中國人的性格。中國人的心理與行為：理念及方法篇（一九九二）。臺北：桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1177（臺灣：1162，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67885956
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上