臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：參與環境服務給付政策可能影響因素之分析：地主觀點
書刊名：農業與經濟
作者：柳婉郁 引用關係／施瑩艷
作者(外文)：Liu, Wan-yu／Shih, Ying-yen
出版日期：2013
卷期：50
頁次：頁41-66
主題關鍵詞：環境給付；環境服務給付政策；地主決策；Environmental payment；Environmental service payment,；Land owners decision
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:53
許多國家開始進行一系列的環境服務給付措施（payment of environmental service, PES），除了居民從這些方案獲得許多經濟收入，也有利於整體之森林經營環境，也讓當地居民對於森林維護表現更正面的態度。一般研究政策之參與決策行為大多採用決策模型，並詢問受訪者是否有意願參與來進行實證分析影響因素，然而當政策之內涵較難使受訪者瞭解時，則受訪結果也可能產生偏差。因此本研究試圖使用一個新的方法，以分析民眾參與環境服務給付政策之影響因素，並嘗試找出潛在參與民眾之特性。首先，本研究建立一個民眾參與環境服務給付政策之決策模型，將是否參與政策之結果視為無法觀察到的潛在變數，接著本研究根據過去文獻設計問卷，透過許多題項瞭解地主對於政策之看法、態度與認知，再將這些政策看法、態度與認知視為觀察得到的觀察變數，利用因素分析法萃取並分類出構面因素。其次，利用多重迴歸分析法探討影響這些構面因素之因子，進而分析可能影響民眾是否參與環境給付政策之因素，並瞭解潛在可能參加環境給付政策之民眾其所可能具備的特性因子。本研究期待這樣一個新的理論模式與實證結果能提供我國林業部門，在制訂相關環境給付政策決策之參考。
Many countries have carried out a series of payments of environmental services (PES), by which the habitants have acquired a lot of economic income, while the whole forest management environment has received benefits, and the habitants also take a positive attitude toward forest conservation. In general, most of the previous works on the decision behavior of participation in policies applied the decision making model, and inquired the respondents whether they have willingness to participate, so that the factors of affecting the decision can be analyzed empirically. However, if the intention of the policy is hard to be understood by the respondents, the analyzed results may have more biases. As a result, this paper intends to develop a new method to analyze the factors that influence the inhabitants' participation in PES, and tries to find those inhabitants' potential characteristics. First, this paper establishes a decision-making model of the public's participation in the PES, which takes the result of whether to participate in the PES as an unobservable potential variable. Then, this paper bases the previous literature to design our questionnaire, which includes a lot of questions to realize landowners' opinions, attitude and cognition toward this policy. Regarding those policy opinions, attitude and cognition as observable variables, we apply the factor analysis approach to extract and classify dimension factors. Second, we apply the multiple regression analysis to investigate the factors that influence those dimension factors, and further analyze the factors that could affect the public's participation in the PES. In addition, the analysis is used to realize the potential people that participate in the PES, and their characteristics. This paper expects that such a novel theoretical model and empirical results are capable of providing a reference to the forestry sector in Taiwan to draw up the policies on PES.
期刊論文
1.Wunder, Sven(2000)。Ecotourism and Economic Incentives--an Empirical Approach。Ecological Economics，32(3)，465-479。  new window
2.任憶安、林俊成(19971200)。臺灣私有林造林獎勵方式效果的評估--林農反應調查報告。臺灣林業科學，12(4)，393-402。  延伸查詢new window
3.任憶安、林俊成(20010600)。臺灣私有林農對森林生態系經營態度之調查分析。中華林學季刊，34(2)，195-208。  延伸查詢new window
4.李久先、顏添明、許哲維(20071200)。私有林主對於造林獎勵政策認知及政策態度之探討--以臺中縣為例。林業研究季刊，29(4)，43-53。  延伸查詢new window
5.汪大雄、鍾旭和、林俊秀(19940600)。苗栗縣公私有林經營現況之調查分析。林業試驗所研究報告季刊，9(2)，143-160。  延伸查詢new window
6.汪大雄、鍾旭和、王培蓉(1998)。台灣私有林經營輔導之研究。台灣林業科學，13(1)，55-68。  延伸查詢new window
7.林俊秀、陳麗琴(19970200)。私有林主造林行為之分析。臺灣省林業試驗所簡訊，4(1)=16，6-10。  延伸查詢new window
8.林國慶、柳婉郁(20110600)。私有地主參與造林獎勵政策之決策行為分析。農業經濟叢刊，16(2)，77-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Atmis, E.、Dasdemir, I.、Lise, W.、Yildiran, O.(2007)。Factors Affecting Women’s Participation in Forestry in Turkey。Ecological Economics，60(4)，787-796。  new window
10.Bengston, D. H.(1994)。Changing Forest Values and Ecosystem Management。Society & Natural Resources，7(5)，515-533。  new window
11.Britt, C.、Shrestha, N. K.(1998)。Hidden Faces and Public Spaces: A Reappraisal of Women’s Contribution in Realizing Community Forest Management in the Hindu-Kush Himalaya。Forests, Trees People Newsletter，35(1)，4-8。  new window
12.De Boer, W.、Baquete, D. S.(1998)。Natural Resource Use, Crop Damage and Attitudes of Rural People in the Vicinity of the Maputo Elephant Reserve, Mozambique,。Environmental Conservation，25(3)，208-218。  new window
13.Dolisca, F.、R. C. Douglas、J. M. McDaniel、D. A. Shannon、C. M. Jollya(2006)。Factors Influencing Farmers’ Participation in Forestry Management Programs: A Case Study from Haiti。Forest Ecology and Management，236，324-331。  new window
14.Gbadegesin, A.、Ayileka, O.(2000)。Avoiding the Mistakes of the Past: Towards a Community Oriented Management Strategy for the Proposed National Park in Abuja, Nigeria。Abuja, Nigeria," Land Use Policy，17(2)，89-100。  new window
15.Geisler, C. C.(2002)。Endangered Humans。Foreign Policy，130(3)，80-81。  new window
16.Glendinning, A.、hapatra, J.、Mitchell, C. P.(2001)。Modes of Communication and Effectives of Agroforestry Extension in Eastern India。Human Ecology，29(3)，283-305。  new window
17.Hackel, J. D.(1999)。Community Conservation and the Future of Africa’s Wildlife。Conservaton Biology，13(4)，734-736。  new window
18.Heinen, J. T.(1996)。Human Behavior, Incentives and Protected Areas Management。Conservation Biology，10(2)，681-684。  new window
19.Lise, W.(2000)。Factors Influencing Peoples’ Participation in Forest Management in India。Ecology Economics，34(3)，379-392。  new window
20.McGregor, J.(1995)。Gathered Produce in Zimbabwe’s Communal Areas Changing Resource Availability and Use。Ecology of Food Nutrition，33，163-193。  new window
21.Napier, T.、M. V. Carter、E. G. Bryant(1986)。Local Perceptions of Reservoir Impacts: A Test of Vested Interests。American Journal of Community Psychology，14(1)，17-37。  new window
22.Napier, T. L.、A. S. Napier(1991)。Perceptions of Conservation Compliance among Farmers in a Highly Erodible Area of Ohio。Journal of Soil and Water Conservation，48(3)，220-224。  new window
23.Nepal, S. K.、K. E. Weber(1995)。Prospects for Coexistence: Wildlife and Local People。Ambio，24(4)，238-245。  new window
24.Owubah, C.、Lemaster, D. C.、Bowker, J. M.、Lee, J. G.(2001)。Forest Tenure Systems and Sustainable Forest Management: The Case of Ghana。Forest Ecology and Management，149，253-264。  new window
25.Portes, A.(1971)。Political Primitivism Differential Socialization and Lower–Class Radicalism。American Sociological Review，36(5)，820-835。  new window
26.Salam, M. A.、Noguchi, T.、Koike, M.(2000)。Understanding Why Farmers Plant Trees in the Homestead Agroforestry in Bangladesh。Agroforestry System，50(1)，77-93。  new window
27.Stein, T. V.、Anderson, D. H.、Kelly, T.(1999)。Using Stakeholders’ Values to Apply Ecosystem Management in an Upper Midwest Landscape。Environmental Management，24(3)，399-413。  new window
28.Studsrod, J. E.、Wegge, P.(1995)。Park-People Relationships: The Case of Damage Caused by Park Animals Around the Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal。Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal," Environmental Conservation，22(2)，133-142。  new window
29.Thacher, T.、Lee, D. R.、Schelhas, J. W.(1997)。Farmer Participation in Reforestation Incentive Programs in Costa Rica。Agroforestry System，35(3)，269-289。  new window
30.Udaya Sekhar, N.(1998)。Crop and Livestock Depredation Caused by Wild Animals in Protected Areas: The Case of Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India。Environmental Conservation，25(2)，160-171。  new window
31.Walpole, M. J.、Goodwin, H. J.(2001)。Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia。Environmental Conservation，28(2)，160-166。  new window
32.Weeks, P.、J. M. Packard(1997)。Acceptance of Scientific Management by Natural Resource Dependent Communities。Conservation Biology，11(1)，236-245。  new window
33.Zhang, D.、Pearse, P. H.(1996)。Differences in Silvicultural Investment under Various Types of Forest Tenure in British Columbia。Forest Science，44(4)，442-449。  new window
34.王培蓉(19970600)。扇平自然教育區遊客問卷設計之信度分析。臺灣林業科學，12(2)，217-222。  延伸查詢new window
35.吳俊賢、陳溢宏、林俊成、許秋雁(20051200)。私有林農對國土復育策略方案暨行動計畫之意向分析--以南投縣為例。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告，19(4)=250，301-314。  延伸查詢new window
36.林俊成、李國忠(20050800)。都市森林對二氧化碳減量的貢獻。臺灣林業，31(4)，10-14。  延伸查詢new window
37.林俊成、李國忠(20050600)。京都議定書生效後之森林資源碳吸存策略。臺灣林業，31(3)，12-19。  延伸查詢new window
38.林俊成、李國忠、林裕仁(20000300)。森林收穫與林產品使用之二氧化碳流動與貯存效果初步分析。中華林學季刊，33(1)，53-64。  延伸查詢new window
39.林俊成、鄭美如、劉淑芬、李國忠(20020900)。全民造林運動二氧化碳吸存潛力之經濟效益評估。臺灣林業科學，17(3)，311-321。  延伸查詢new window
40.顏添明、李久先、許哲維(20080900)。私有林主之參與經驗與造林獎勵政策關係之探討--以臺中縣為例。林業研究季刊，30(3)，53-63。  延伸查詢new window
41.林俊成、李俊志、王培蓉、陳麗琴、柳婉郁(20100600)。私有林主對全球暖化議題認知與造林減碳意願之分析。農林學報，59(2)，105-121。  延伸查詢new window
42.Newmark, W. D.、Leonard, N. L.、Sariko, H. I.、Gamassa, Deo-Gratias M.(1993)。Conservation Attitudes of Local People Living Adjacent to Five Protected Areas in Tanzania。Biological Conservation，63(2)，177-183。  new window
43.Kaiser, Henry F.(1974)。An index of factorial simplicity。Psychometrika，39(1)，31-36。  new window
44.Tinsley, Howard E. A.、Tinsley, Diane J.(1987)。Use of factor analysis in counseling psychology research。Journal of counseling Psychology，34(4)，414-424。  new window
45.Alexander, S. E.(2000)。Resident attitudes towards conservation and black howler monkeys in Belize: The community baboon sanctuary。Environmental Conservation，27(4)，341-350。  new window
46.Hardie, I. W.、Parks, P. J.(1991)。Individual Choice and Regional Acreage Response to Cost-sharing in the South, 1971-1981。Forest Science，37(1)，175-190。  new window
47.Nagubadi, Venkatarao、McNamara, Kevin T.、Hoover, William L.、Mills, Walter L., Jr.(1996)。Program Participation Behavior of Nonindustrial Forest Landowners: A Probit Analysis。Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics，28(2)，323-336。  new window
48.Fiallo, E. A.、Jacobson, S. K.(1995)。Local communities and protected areas: Attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador。Environmental Conservation，22(3)，241-249。  new window
49.Rahm, M. R.、Huffman, W. E.(1984)。The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables。American Journal of Agricultural Economics，66，405-413。  new window
50.Zhang, D.、Flick, W.(2001)。Sticks, Carrots and Reforestation Investment。Land Economics，77(3)，443-456。  new window
會議論文
1.Vining, J.(1993)。Environmental Values, Emotions, and Public Involvement。Conference in West Lafayette, Indiana，(會議日期: November 19-21, 1991)。West Lafayette, Indiana：Purdue University, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Press。26-31。  new window
研究報告
1.林國慶(2008)。因應國際溫室氣體減量臺灣森林資源經營管理政策之調整 (計畫編號：97 農科-7.2.1-務-e1(2))。臺北：國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.柳婉郁(2010)。原住民保留地最適造林地獎勵金之研究。台南：真理大學生態觀光經營學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林俊成(1994)。私有林經營意願與補貼制度之研究:臺北縣個案研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Ghimire, K. B.、Pimbert, M. P.(1997)。Social Change and Conservation: An Overview of Issues and Concept。Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas。London, UK：Earthscan Publications Limited Press。  new window
2.Gregersen, H.、S. Draper、D. Elz(1989)。People and Trees: The Role of Social Forestry in Sustainable Development。Washington, DC：World Bank Press。  new window
3.Higman, S.、S. Bass、N. Judd、J. Mayers、R. Nussbaum(1999)。The Sustainable Forestry Handbook。London：Earthscan Publications Press。  new window
4.Sabatelli, R.、Sheehan, C. L.(1993)。Exchange and Resource Theories。Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods: A Contextual Approach。New York：Plenum Press。  new window
5.陳景堂(2004)。統計分析SPSS for Windows入門與應用。台北：儒林圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.行政院主計處(2013)。2005年林業普查，http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=18567&ctNode=555&mp=4。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：880（臺灣：874，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67996954
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上