:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同訊息回饋介入對跆拳道初學者品勢動作技能學習成效分析
書刊名:臺灣運動心理學報
作者:陳人維劉淑燕 引用關係李元宏 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Jen-weiLiu, SuyenLee, Yuan-hung
出版日期:2013
卷期:13:2
頁次:頁61-74
主題關鍵詞:回饋跆拳道品勢動作技能訊息視覺化FeedbackTaekwondo PoomsaeMotor skillsInformation visualization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:59
回饋策略之運用攸關於動作技能學習效果,視覺化回饋可促進對複雜動作技能的理解,不啻為學習的利器。目的:探討表現獲知 (KP) 訊息回饋與表現獲知 影像 (KP V) 訊息回饋介入對跆拳道品勢動作技能學習效果的差異。方法: 20 名跆拳道初學者 (年齡:11.50 ± 1.00 歲) 隨機分配至KP 組與PK V 組,每週實施兩次品勢教學,每次30 分鐘,為期四週,於回饋介入前、後實施太極一章動作技能測驗,所得資料以獨立樣本t 檢定、二因子混合變異數等進行統計分析。結果:(1) 教學後KP 及KP V 兩組之品勢動作技能表現均高於教學前;(2) 教學後KP 組與KP V 組兩組間未達顯著差異,但是KP V 組的學習表現有略好的趨勢。結論:教學過程中教師應適時給予表現獲知或影像的訊息回饋,尤其是利用影像的視覺化回饋,學習者更容易偵測錯誤、提升動作技能認知的理解, 促進動作技能修正與動機,建構最適當的動作學習模式,最終能將技能的最佳化模型儲存於長期記憶之中,符合「訊息視覺化」策略的論點。
The utilization of feedback tactics could make a difference in motor skill learning and visual feedback is an excellent tool to enhance the understanding of the complexity of a motor skill. Purposes: To compare the differences between knowledge of performance (KP) an d KP plus video demonstration (KP V) feedback interventions on taekwondo Poomsae learning. Methods: 20 taekwondo beginners (ages: 11.50 ± 1.00 years) were randomly assigned to the KP group and KP V group and accepted Poomsae lessons twice a week for 4 weeks. Each lesson lasted for 30 minutes. Tai Chi Chapter One skill tests were carried out on the first and last lessons. Independent sample t test, and mixed two -way ANOVA were employed to analyze the data. Results: (1) Poomsae performance was significant ly improved in both groups after 4 weeks teaching with both of these two types of feedback. (2) There were no significant differences between the KP and KP V groups, indicating the visual feedback had no significant effectiveness over verbal feedback but the KP V group showed a trend of superior performance. Conclusion: Verbal or video demonstration feedback should be given at the right teaching moment, In particular, visual demonstration feedback allows learners to more easily detect movement errors, facilitate the motor-cognition, enhance the learning motivation, and construct the optimal movement patterns into long term memory which is in line with the perspectives of ”information visualization” strategy.
期刊論文
1.Ellis, A. E.(2003)。Personality type and participation in networked learning environments。Education Media International,40,101-112。  new window
2.Morrison, C. S.、Reeve, E. J.(1988)。Effect of instruction and undergraduate major on qualitative skill analysis。Journal of Human Movement Studies,15,291-297。  new window
3.趙高政(20060100)。不同回饋訊息對初學高爾夫推桿技能表現之影響。彰化師大體育學報,6,319-330。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.簡桂彬、麥吉誠、蕭今傑(20060300)。回饋的訊息對體育教學效率之影響。國立臺灣科技大學.人文社會學報,2,1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Guadagnoli, M.、Holcomb, W.、Davis, M.(2002)。The efficacy of video feedback for learning the golf swing。Journal of Sport Sciences,20,615-622。  new window
6.Kim, H.、Kramer, J. F.(1997)。Effectiveness of visual feedback during isokinetic exercise。Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy,26,318-323。  new window
7.Rougier, P.(1999)。Influence of visual feedback on successive control mechanisms in upright quiet stance in humans assessed by fractional Brownian motion modeling。Neuroscience Letters,266,157-160。  new window
8.van Vlitet, P. M.、Wulf, G.(2006)。Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence?。Disability and Rehabilitation,28,831-884。  new window
9.謝麗娟(20040800)。迷你網球教學對大專學生選修網球課程之學習效果。北體學報,12,221-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.楊健生、王儀旭、蔡進祥(20080500)。不同訊息回饋策略介入對網球初學者動作技能學習成效分析。輔仁大學體育學刊,7,28-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Magill, R. A.、Schoenfelder-Zohdi, S. B.(1996)。A visual model and knowledge of performance as sources of learning a rhythmic gymnastics skill。International Journal of Sport Psychology,27(1),7-22。  new window
12.王儀旭、周建智、邱仕友(20040900)。探討不同體育教學回饋策略模式介入對投擲學習效果的影響。復興崗學報,81,273-302。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Tzetzis, G.、Mantis, K.、Zachopoulou, E.、Kioumourtzoglou, E.(1999)。The effect of modeling and verbal feedback on skill learning。Journal of Human Movement Studies,36,137-151。  new window
14.王儀旭、周建智、曾文鑫(20031200)。探討KP&KR回饋理論介入對投擲學習成效之影響--以手榴彈野戰投擲為例。復興崗學報,79,185-204。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Bandura, Albert(1993)。Perceived Self-efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning。Educational Psychologist,28(2),117-148。  new window
會議論文
1.中華民國跆拳道協會(2011)。公認品勢計分法。一百年全國品勢裁判研習會。桃園:職訓中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.宋亭萱(2011)。視覺回饋對於腿部推舉重量訓練的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市,臺灣。  延伸查詢new window
2.Zhu, B.(2011)。Assessing the effects of feedback type and modality on motor skill learning and human motivation(博士論文)。North Carolina State University,North Carolina。  new window
3.賴清水(2006)。不同教學法對網球初學者學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.簡桂彬(2001)。不同技能表現獲知對足球內側傳球技能表現的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.卓俊伶(2000)。動作學習。運動心理學。臺北市:中華民國體育學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔣懷孝(2008)。回饋。運動技能學習。臺北市:禾楓。  延伸查詢new window
3.Kukkiwon, U. Y.(2005)。Taekwondo textbook。Seoul:O-sung Publishing Company。  new window
4.Rink, J. E.(1998)。Teaching physical education for learning。McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.Schmidt, R. A.、Wrisberg, C. A.(2008)。Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach。Human Kinetics。  new window
6.Locke, E. A.、Latham, G. P.(1990)。A theory of goal setting and task performance。Prentice Hall。  new window
圖書論文
1.闕月清(2000)。教師回饋與體育教學。運動心理學。臺北:中華民國體育學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE