:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:吳闓生《詩義會通》研究
書刊名:東海中文學報
作者:呂珍玉 引用關係
作者(外文):Lu, Chen-yu
出版日期:2013
卷期:26
頁次:頁89-141
主題關鍵詞:吳闓生詩義會通詩經桐城義法Wu Kai-shengShi-Yi Hui-TongThe Book of OdeCompositional Principle of Tongcheng School
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:25
二十世紀初歷經五四新文學運動及狂飊奮進的二 0年代,在胡適、顧頡剛等學者鼓吹之下,去《序》廢經、疑古辨偽、引進新的學術研究方法,以及用白話文書寫,已成為《詩經》研究的新趨勢。吳闓生《詩義會通》成書於 1927年,適逢此《詩經》研究變動時代,但仍尊《序》,並用桐城古文義法詮釋《詩經》,可謂其中異數。本文從吳闓生生平事蹟與著述、新文學運動至二 0年代的學術思潮與詮詩特點、《詩義會通》的版本與體例、《詩義會通》的詮《詩》觀點、《詩義會通》的撰寫特色、以文學說《詩》、《詩義會通》的局限與缺失等七個面向,全面探討這部被批評為保守派的《詩經》研究論著。研究結果提出《詩義會通》具有包容漢宋、注重字詞訓解、注重異文、會通眾說等小學經學上的優點。此外它的最大特色是發揮桐城義法,精闢詮釋《詩經》的文章學、篇章語言學、文藝風格學,對《詩經》的文筆、風格、體式、意境、結構、修辭等審美層面,作出欣賞範式。在變動時代的《詩經》研究中仍不失為一部參驗舊文,抒所獨得,發掘《詩經》文學價值的獨特之作。正因為它既不違背傳統經學說詩,又要從桐城古文義法發掘《詩經》的文學價值,有時難免出現游移其間的態度,反而更具鮮明的時代色彩,是傳統《詩經》詮釋過渡到現代的橋樑。
After the May Fourth New Literature Movement and the stormy years of 20s in the early 20th century, scholarly researches on the Book of Ode could not remain the same. New approaches were set forth by Hu Shi, Gu Jie-gang, and others, who heralded the use of vernacular language and new research methods, and launched campaigns such as “abrogating classics and the teachings of the Preface of the Book of Ode ,” and “questioning antiquities and identifying falsities.” Written somehow against this new current in 1927 and dubbed conservative, Wu Kai-sheng’s Shi-yi Hui-tong (詩義會通) held onto the doctrine of the Preface and reinterpreted the Book of Ode in terms of the compositional principle of the Tongcheng School. This paper provides a complete evaluation of Shi-yi Hui-tong by bringing into consideration Wu’s biographical data, his other publications, the academic situation, and the trends of thought in his time. The paper also investigates variant edition of the book and its principle of compilation, elucidates its literary hermeneutic of the Book of Ode, and the characteristic and limitation of its research perspective. The study reveals that Shi-yi Hui-tong writes in the tradition of the Han and the Song scholarship of the classics and philological studies, and therefore makes quality contributions in its heed to lexical interpretation and textual variations, and its integration of various strands of comment. The genuine achievement of Shi-yi Hui-tong, moreover, lies in its explication of the Book of Ode in terms of the literary principle of the Tongcheng School. By looking into the compositional, the linguistic and the literary aspects of the Book of Ode, Wu highlights its rhetoric, form, style and structure, setting an example of aesthetic approach to the classic. Among the contemporary attempts to provide new readings of the Book of Ode, Shi-yi Hui-tong stands out as one that sheds new lights to the literary value of the classic by blending the approach of the Tongcheng School with an otherwise traditional hermeneutic. There are ambiguities in Wu’s attitude toward the two lines of approach that he combines, but that only reflects all the more truthfully the cultural situation of his time, a time when even the hermeneutic of the Book of Ode needs to find its ways to the modern.
期刊論文
1.王維庭(1996)。吳北江先生傳略。文獻,1996(1)。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾光光(2004)。桐城派與清代學術流變。福建論壇(人文社會科學版),2004(12)。  延伸查詢new window
3.王博(2005)。20世紀詩經研究述略。陜西師範大學繼續教育學報,2005(3)。  延伸查詢new window
4.王小婷(2005)。論詩義會通對詩經的文學解讀。山東師範大學學報(人文社會科學版),50(3)=200。  延伸查詢new window
5.林祥徵(1999)。二十世紀中國詩經研究述略。泰安師專學報,21(2)。  延伸查詢new window
6.檀作文(2000)。20世紀詩經研究史略。天中學刊,15(1)。  延伸查詢new window
7.夏傳才(2003)。現代詩經學開端的十年。唐山師範學院學報,2003(6),25-30。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.呂善成(1998)。桐城古文義法研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園中壢。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳慧貞(1999)。姚鼐古文義法及文章寫作學(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.翁稷安(2005)。清季文之理念與經世使命的展開與影響--以吳汝綸為中心(碩士論文)。臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.金華珍(2006)。桐城派詩論研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.趙棟棟(2006)。桐城文派的形成及其古文理論意義之闡釋(碩士論文)。陜西師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.白憲娟(2006)。20世紀二三十年代的詩經研究--以胡適、顧頡剛、聞一多詩經研究為例(碩士論文)。山東大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.傅斯年(2004)。詩經講義稿(含《中國古代文學史講義》)。北京:中國人民大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.姚鼐(1975)。惜抱軒詩文集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
3.姚鼐(1981)。惜抱軒全集。臺北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.姚鼐(1956)。今體詩鈔。臺中:中庸出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉開(2002)。孟涂文集。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.姚瑩(1988)。康輶紀行。臺北:新興書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳汝綸、吳闓生(1963)。桐城吳先生日記。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.姚永樸(1962)。文學研究法。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.劉聲木、徐天祥(1982)。桐城文學淵源撰述考。合肥:黃山書社。  延伸查詢new window
10.吳闓生(1977)。詩義會通。臺北:洪氏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.萬奇(1999)。桐城派與中國文章理論。呼和浩特:內蒙古教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊懷志、潘忠榮(2002)。清代文壇盟主桐城派。合肥:安徽人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.顧頡剛等(1941)。古史辨。香港:太平書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.胡適(1990)。中國新文學大系。臺北:業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳平原(2005)。中國現代化學術之建立--以章太炎、胡適之為中心。臺北:麥田出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.姚鼐(1981)。古文辭類纂。臺北:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.郭紹虞(1969)。中國文學批評史。明倫出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.夏傳才(200507)。二十世紀詩經學。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.徐世昌(1976)。清儒學案。臺北:燕京文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
20.方苞(1995)。朱子詩義補正。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.劉大樾(1998)。論文偶記。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.趙沛霖(2006)。現代學術文化思潮與詩經研究--二十世紀詩經研究史。北京:學苑出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.毛亨、鄭玄(197309)。毛詩鄭箋。臺北:新興書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.陳奐(198610)。詩毛氏傳疏敘錄。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
25.馬瑞辰、陳金生(200402)。毛詩傳箋通釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
26.周中明(1999)。桐城派研究。遼寧大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.馬其昶(1972)。毛詩學。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
28.梅曾亮(1969)。柏梘山房文集。臺北:華文書局。  延伸查詢new window
29.朱熹(1974)。詩集傳。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
30.方玉潤(1981)。詩經原始。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
31.吳闓生(1970)。詩義會通。臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
32.胡適(1953)。胡適文存。遠東。  延伸查詢new window
33.吳汝綸、施培毅、徐壽凱(2002)。吳汝綸全集。黃山書社。  延伸查詢new window
34.方東樹、汪紹楹(1985)。昭昧詹言。漢京文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
35.趙建章(2003)。桐城派文學思想研究。北京圖書館出版社。  延伸查詢new window
36.錢基博(1970)。現代中國文學史。明倫出版社。  延伸查詢new window
37.國史館(1986)。清史稿校注。臺北:國史館。  延伸查詢new window
38.王船山(1998)。詩經稗疏。船山全書。長沙:嶽麓書社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.稊園詩社,http://www.2499cn.com/wenhua/19.htm, 2008/07/31。  new window
2.魏洲平。永遠的吳北江大師,http://weizhouping.blshe.com/post/203/14587, 2006/06/20。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.郭立志撰(1972)。桐城吳先生年譜。近代中國史料叢刊。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.林紓(199805)。論文十六忌。春覺齋論文。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE