:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:產銷履歷驗證之價值評估--以水產品之產銷履歷驗證為例
書刊名:農業經濟叢刊
作者:闕雅文 引用關係陳麗婷
作者(外文):Chiueh, Ya-wenChen, Li-ting
出版日期:2014
卷期:19:2
頁次:頁43-64
主題關鍵詞:水產品產銷履歷驗證願付價值Aquatic productsTraceability certificationWillingness to pay
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:36
本研究發展「魚市場情境」之問卷情境設計,模擬消費者於市場中 同時挑選多種物品之購物情境,發展同時使用多組詢價工具於單一問卷 中針對單一評估對象之假設性市場評估法。並配合此種研究設計,於計 量實證方法上應用縱橫資料迴歸分析方法萃取願付價格。這樣的問卷設 計與實證方法可以讓每位受訪者之願付價格,均能透過不同詢價工具重 複驗證,而提高詢價之精確性與評價效率。在所研發方法驗證上,本文 針對產銷履歷驗證之價值進行評估,問卷填答情境設計即模擬民眾在市 場中同時挑選多種水產品之購買情境:在同一份問卷中以不同魚種經產 銷履歷驗證之願付買價增額比例為詢價工具,亦即於同一份問卷中讓受 訪者依照其意願與偏好,勾選多項目(不同魚種)之詢價工具,而能針 對產銷履歷驗證之價值,蒐集較為完備之資訊,進行評估。訪問方式是 針對台灣北中南三區的現代通路及傳統通路的水產品採買者進行訪員直 接面訪。研究結果發現,本文所建立之針對單一評估對象同時使用多組 詢價工具之模擬情境設計,為條件評估法問卷詢價與實證方法改善之具 發展性研究方法。研究成果可為台灣水產品養殖與加工業者擬定履歷驗 證產品之價格參考。
This study developed on the “aquatic products market scenario” questionnaire design, simulating consumers selecting multiple items for purchase in a market. Development included contingent valuation methods using multiple inquiry tools on a single questionnaire targeted at individual respondents. In accord with this type of study, panel data regression analysis was used with econometric methods to obtain the price consumers are willing to pay. The accuracy and effectiveness of price inquiry in the study is increased through repeated verification designed into the questionnaires and empirical methods to determine each interviewee’s willingness to pay. As for the testing of the study methods used, this study evaluates the added value on fishery products from traceable certification. As for verifying research methods, this study is aimed at evaluating the added value to fishery products from traceability certification through design of the scenario created by questionnaires and simulating consumers in a market scenario where several fishery product choices are available for purchase. The questionnaires contain several different typesof fishery products with certified traceability; the ratio of increased willingness to pay for the traceable products is used as a price inquiry tool to evaluate the difference in price consumers are willing to pay for the traceability. Through results from interviews directly with consumers of fishery products from both modern and traditional channels from Taiwan’s north, central and southern districts, the research showed that simulations using multiple inquiry tools on a single consumer as established in this study is a method that can be adopted in the contingent valuation method and the empirical method in price inquiry questionnaires for more effectiveness. Results from this test could be used in reference by aquaculturists and processors in promotion strategies and in production planning.
期刊論文
1.胡其湘(20080400)。從全球競爭觀點談水產品安全管理制度。食品工業,40(4),6-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫智麗(20051200)。食品標識的價值--從消費者願付價格與行為調查剖析。臺灣經濟研究月刊,28(12)=336,98-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳麗婷(20080400)。經認證或具品牌之優質水產品行銷策略。食品工業,40(4),39-45。  延伸查詢new window
4.顏如汾、黃炳文(20070600)。農民團體對行銷諮詢願付價值之研究--以品牌水果為例。農業經濟半年刊,81,121-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Blaine, T. W.、Lichtkoppler, F. R.、Jones, K. R.、Zondag, R. H.(2005)。An Assessment of Household Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling: A Comparison of Payment Card and Referendum Approaches。Journal of Environmental Management,76(1),15-22。  new window
6.Blumenschein, K.、Blomquist, G. C.、Johannesson, M.、Horn, N.、Freeman, P.(2008)。Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment。The Economic Journal,118(525),114-137。  new window
7.Folinas, D.、Manikas, I.、Manos, B.(2006)。Traceability Data Management for Food Chains。British Food Journal,108(8),622-633。  new window
8.Hammerschmidt, T、Zeitler, H.、Leidl, R.(2003)。Unexpected Yes-and No-Answering Behaviour in the Discrete Choice Approach to Elicit Willingness to Pay: A Methodological Comparison with Payment Cards。International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics,3,147-166。  new window
9.Jordan, J. L.、Elnagheeb, A. H.(1994)。Consequences of Using Different Question Formats in Contingent Valuation: A Monte Carlo Study。Land Economics,70(1),97-110。  new window
10.Mathews, K. E.(2008)。Under the Microscope: Dissection of a Contingent Valuation Survey。The Appraisal Journal,76(3),259-269。  new window
11.Nocera, S.、Bonato, D.、Telser, H.(2002)。The Contingency of Contingent Valuation How Much Are People Willing to Pay against Alzheimer’s Disease。International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics,2(3),219-240。  new window
12.Randrup, M.、Storøy, J.、Lievonen, S.、Margeirsson, S.、Arnason, S. V.、Olavsstovu, D.、Frosch, S.、Frederiksen, M. T.(2008)。Simulated Recalls of Fish Products in Five Nordic Countries。Food Control,19,1064-1069。  new window
13.詹滿色、傅祖壇(20070600)。臺灣漁產品HACCP安全認證的價值評估--雙界二分假設市場評估法之應用。農業經濟叢刊,12(2),163-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.葉俐嫻、張正明、莊慶達(2003)。消費者對水產品HACCP認知之研究。臺灣省水產學會研討會,(會議日期: 20031220)。台中。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳麗婷、李河水(2007)。各消費層水產品偏好調查分析 (計畫編號:96 農科-15.4.1-漁-F2(Z))。食品工業發展研究所。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.戎水木(2003)。台北縣市地區消費者願意支付HACCP認證漁產品之分析(碩士論文)。國立海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.何惠茹(2004)。消費者認知與冷凍鰻魚片願付價值(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林素連(2007)。消費者對CAS認證漁產品認知與消費行為之研究--以大台北地區家庭為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.潘俊宏(2008)。消費者對養殖漁產品產銷履歷願付價值之衡量(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Derrick, S.、Dillon, M.(2004)。A Guide to Traceability within the Fish Industry。Zurich, Switzerland:Sippo:Eurofish。  new window
2.Scheaffer, R. L.、Mendenhall, W. III、Ott, R. L.(1996)。Elementary Survey Sampling。Duxbury Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Frederiksen, M.、Gram, L.(2003)。Traceability。Assessment and Management of Seafood Safety。Rome, Italy:Food and Agriculture Organization。  new window
2.Karlsen, K. M.、Senneset, G.(2006)。Traceability: Simulated Recall of Fish Products。Seafood Research from Fish to Dish: Quality, Safety and Processing of Wild and Farmed Fish。Wageningen, The Netherlands:Wageningem Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top