:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運動技術測驗給分類別的機率分配研究
書刊名:運動教練科學
作者:姚漢禱 引用關係王榮照
作者(外文):Yau, Han-dauWang, Jung-chao
出版日期:2015
卷期:37
頁次:頁27-37
主題關鍵詞:Rasch測量常態分配羅吉斯分配二項分配Rasch measurementNormal distributionLogistic distributionBinomial distribution
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:18
運動技術測驗通常採用主客觀的方法設定給分類別,但應該根據何種機率理論最適當?因此,本研究的目的是模擬研究運動技術測驗給分類別的最適合機率分配。研究對象是:常態分配、羅吉斯分配、二項分配等三種機率分配,研究方法先利用SAS和Minitab隨機產生模擬資料,然後用Rasch評分量尺模式估計資料,實驗設計為樣本數和測驗長度二因子,各模擬24次。結果:第一樣本大小在3,000個反應資料以上時,常態分配是理想的機率分配。第二樣本大小在1,500個反應資料以下時,羅吉斯分配是較好的機率分配。結論:Rasch模式評分量尺類別設定宜依據適當的機率分配,且選擇的機率分配和樣本大小有關。
The testing of sports skills usually was used to set the score categories by subjective method, but what should it assign the most appropriate probability theoretical basis? Therefore, the purpose of the study was to optimize distributions of probability the score categories of sports skills testing in simulation research. The objects of the study were normal distribution, logistic distribution, and binomial distribution. The method was to use SAS and Minitab to produce random data, and then use Rasch rating scale model to estimate data. Experiment design was two-way design (sample × test length), and we simulated them 24 runs for each cell. The results were: 1. Normal distribution was the ideal distribution of probability when sample size was over 3,000 in response data. 2. Logistic distribution was the better distribution of probability when sample size was less than 1,500 in response data. The conclusion of the study was that Rasch rating scale model wish set the appropriate category based on probability distribution, and the probability distribution of selection was related to the sample size.
期刊論文
1.楊智為、卓淑瑜、郭伯臣、陳亭宇(20110600)。DINA與G-DINA模式參數不變性探討。測驗統計年刊,19(上),1-15。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Linacre, J. M.(2002)。Understanding Rasch Measurement: Optimizing Rating Scale Category Effectiveness。The Journal of Applied Measurement,3(1),85-106。  new window
3.姚漢禱(20111200)。運動技術測驗的合理類別設定方法研究--以重複測量單一項目測驗為例。臺灣體育學術研究,51,79-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Andrich, D.(1996)。Category ordering and their utility。Rasch Measurement Transactions,9(4),464-465。  new window
5.Linacre, J. M.(1991)。Step disordering and Rasch Thurstone Thresholds。Rasch Measurement Transactions,5(3),171。  new window
6.Linacre, J. M.(2001)。Category, step and threshold: Definitions and disordering。Rasch Measurement Transactions,15(1),794-796。  new window
7.Linacre, J. M.(2010)。Transitional categories and usefully disordered thresholds。Online Educational Research Journal,1。  new window
8.Pesudovs, K.、Gothwal, V. K.、Wright, T.、Lamoureux, E. L.(2010)。Remediating serious flaws in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire。Journal Cataract Refract Surg,36(5),718-732。  new window
9.Siegert, R. J.、Jackson, D. M.、Tennant, A.、Turner-Stokes, L.(2010)。Factor analysis and Rasch analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview for acquired brain injury carer research。Journal Rehabilitation Medicine,42(4),302-309。  new window
10.Shaw, F.、Wright, B.、Linacre, J. M.(1992)。Disordered steps?。Rasch Measurement Transactions,6(2),225。  new window
11.Stone, M. H.、Wright, B. D.(1994)。Maximizing rating scale information。Rasch Measurement Transactions,8(3),386。  new window
12.Tennant, A.(2004)。Disordered Thresholds: An example from the Functional Independence Measure。Rasch Measurement Transactions,17(4),945-948。  new window
13.姚漢禱、紀世清、周嵩益、姚偉哲(20080600)。修訂立定跳遠發展階段的觀察檢核表。國立臺灣體育大學論叢,19(1),35-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.姚漢禱、謝伸裕(19921200)。運動技術測驗中設定試做的適宜次數。體育學報,14,339-350。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Andrich, D.(1978)。A Rating Formulation for Ordered Response Categories。Psychometrika,43(4),561-573。  new window
會議論文
1.Chou, S. I.、Yau, H. D.(2006)。An Evaluation of the Assessing the Development Level of the Standing Long Jump Observation Checklist。The 2nd Pacific Rim Objective Measurement Symposium, PROMS HK 2006,(會議日期: 2006/06/27-06/29)。Hong Kong:Hong Kong Institute of Education。  new window
2.Barton, R. R.(2010)。Simulation experiment design。Baltimore, MD。75-86。  new window
學位論文
1.陳玟靜(2008)。桌球甲組選手正手拉球測驗之編製(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育大學(桃園)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bond, T. G.、Fox, C. M.(2007)。Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Rasch, G.(1980)。Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests: With a foreword and afterword by Benjamin D. Wright。Chicago, IL:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Wright, B. D.、Masters, G. N.(1982)。Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement。Chicago:MESA Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Van Lente, E.、Karabatsos, G.、Uekawa, K.(2010)。A bootstrap approach to rating scale optimization。Access to the foundations of measurement: Professional identity in the career of Benjamin D. Wright。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE