:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea under the San Francisco Peace Treaty
書刊名:Issues & Studies
作者:陳鴻瑜 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Hurng-yu
出版日期:2014
卷期:50:3
頁次:頁169-196
主題關鍵詞:San Francisco Peace TreatyParacelSpratlysRepublic of ChinaSouth China Sea
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:50
Japan occupied the Paracel and Spratly Islands in 1939 and annexed both islands into the administrative jurisdiction of Taiwan. After World War IJ, the troops of the Republic of China were responsible for receiving both of the islands upon the surrender of the Japanese army. On April 28, 1952, the San Francisco Peace Treaty came into force and the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty was signed, with both treaties stipulating that Japan renounce the right, title and claim to the Paracel and Spratly Islands. According to the principle of uti possidetis and occupation, the Republic of China has had the priority right of occupation to hold the right of sovereignty to both islands since that critical date.
期刊論文
1.丘宏達、Park, Choon-Ho(1975)。Legal Status of the Paracel and Spratly Islands。Ocean Development and International Law Journal,3(1),1-28。  new window
2.藤井豐政(193906)。The Possession of Shinnan Islands。中央公論,5(622),154-158。  延伸查詢new window
3.Granados, Ulises(2005)。As China Meets the Southern Sea Frontier: Ocean Identity in the Making, 1902-1937。Pacific Affairs,78(3),443-446。  new window
4.Keesing's Contemporary Archives(1956)。Territorial Disputes over Ownership of Nansha and Paracel Islands。Keeping's Contemporary Archives,10,15131。  new window
5.Marston, Geoffrey(1986)。Abandonment of Territorial Claims: The Cases of Bouvet and Spratly Islands。The British Yearbook of International Law,57(1),337-356。  new window
6.若林修史(193905)。Past and Present of the Shinnan Islands。臺灣時報,234,190-203。  new window
7.山下太郎(193906)。The Records of Exploration in the Shinnan Islands。臺灣時報,235,190-195。  new window
8.山下太郎(193907)。The Records of Exploration in the Shinnan Islands。臺灣時報,236,165-175。  new window
9.O'Connel, D. R.、Patrick, Daniel(1956)。The Status of Formosa and the Chinese Recognition Problem。The American Journal of International Law,50(2),405-416。  new window
10.Tønnesson, Stein(20060200)。The South China Sea in the Age of European Decline。Modern Asian Studies,40(1),1-57。  new window
圖書
1.Chemillier-Gendreau, Monique(2000)。Sovereignty over the Paracel and Spratly Islands。The Hague。  new window
2.Aust, Anthony(2010)。Handbook of International law。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Chen, Tian Shi(1928)。Compilation of Files of the Paracel and Pratas Islands, Files of the Paracel Islands。Shanghai:The Commercial Press LTD。  new window
4.Dzurek, Daniel J.(1996)。The Spratly Islands Dispute: Whos on First?。Durham:International Boundaries Research Unit, University of Durham。  new window
5.Kashi ma Peace Research Institute(1975)。A History of Japan Diplomacy。Tokyo:The Society of Publication of the Kashima Peace Research Institute。  new window
6.Lauterpacht, Hersch(1952)。Oppenheim s International Law。London:Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.。  new window
7.Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China(1958)。中外條約輯編[民國16年至46年]。Taipei:Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China。  new window
8.United States Department of State(1950)。Foreign Relations of the United States, 1950。Washington:U.S. Government Printing Office。  new window
9.Urano, Tatsuo(2007)。Materials System of Political and Social History of Asia-Africa International Relations。Tokyo:Babirus Publishing。  new window
10.山本運一(1939)。Shinnan Islands。Taipei:Ichi Susumu Printing。  new window
11.Jenning, Robert Yewdall(1963)。The Acquisition of Territory in International Law。Manchester:Manchester University Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Ministry of Interior, Republic of China(19470913)。Forward into the Paracel and Spratly Islands。  new window
2.Ministry of Interior, Republic of China(1947)。Stationed Army in the Paracel and Spratlys。  new window
3.National Archives of the United Kingdom(1931)。Spratley (or Storm) Island and Amboyna Cay Island, Borneo: Establishment of British Claim to Sovereignty。  new window
其他
1.Academia Historica(19460712)。Not Delimited Island Case(00315800010001)。,http://163.29.208.22:8080/adminShowImage/connect_img.php?s=496100350003&e=2.。  new window
2.(20110616)。近代歷史上中國政府爲南海諸島命名的情況,http://history.dwnews.com/big5/news/2011-06-16/57814793.html。  延伸查詢new window
3.(19470219)。Vietminh Broadcasts to Fight Forever for Independence and Refutes the Irrational Contest for the Paracel Islands。  new window
4.(19520206)。The ROC Should Take the San Francisco Peace Treaty as a Model of the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty。  new window
5.(19590315)。Sovereignty of Vietnam over the Paracel Islands。  new window
圖書論文
1.丘宏達(2004)。臺灣:澎湖法律地位問題的研究。關於中國領土的國際法問題論集。Taipei:Taiwan Commercial Press。  延伸查詢new window
2.中華民國外交問題研究會(1966)。Records of Negotiation between the ROC and Japan on March 5, 1952。中日外交史料叢編[九]:中華民國對日和約。Taipei:The Research Society of ROC's Diplomatic Problems。  延伸查詢new window
3.中華民國外交問題研究會(1966)。Third Draft of Peace Treaty by Japan on March 28, 1952。中日外交史料叢編[九]:中華民國對日和約。Taipei:The Research Society of ROC's Diplomatic Problems。  延伸查詢new window
4.世界知識出版社(1958)。Statement on the Draft of Peace Treaty of the USA and UK towards Japan and San Francisco Conference by Foreign Minister Chou Enlai, August 15, 1951。中華人民共和國對外關係文件集[二]:1951-953。Beijing:World Knowledge Publishing House。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top