本研究係針對100年度大學校院校務評鑑業務進行後設評鑑，透過問卷調查法、專家諮詢座談與焦點團體座談會之實施，瞭解此次大學校院校務評鑑之優、缺點，俾提供未來相關政策改進之建議。在研究工具方面，本研究採用自編之「大學校院校務評鑑後設評鑑調查問卷」為主要調查工具，並針對受評校院不同調查對象（校長、學術及行政一級單位主管、未兼行政主管職教師及一般行政人員）設計不同問卷。調查結果顯示，整體而言，受評校院人員肯定大學校務評鑑工作之規劃與設計，並認為透過評鑑有助於維持大學品質。但不同樣本間之看法仍略有差異，五項評鑑全通過之受評校院人員，其對評鑑工作之支持度顯著高於五大評鑑項目中有任一項目未通過之受評校院人員。最後，本研究綜合量化與質性資料分析結果，分別針對教育部、高等教育評鑑中心及大學校院提出具體改進建議供參考。

This paper is mainly via adopting the methods of questionnaire survey, professional consultation and focus group discussion, to conduct the meta-evaluation of university institutional evaluation completed in 2011. Based on the analysis of the strength and weakness of the university institutional evaluation, this paper proposes suggestions for the reference of the future reform of related policies. Four different kinds of questionnaires, for the presidents, deans of colleges, directors of the administrative offices, teachers, and administrators in universities, respectively, were designed and used in the study as the main research instruments. It is found that the majority of the surveyed samples hold positive and supportive attitude towards the implementation of university institutional evaluation in general, and agree that the evaluation has helped the universities to maintain or improve their university quality, though the attitudes among different groups of the survey samples slightly varied. The degree of support of the surveyed samples from the universities having been accredited fully to the evaluation is higher than those from universities not being fully accredited. Based on the findings derived from both of the qualitative and quantitative analysis, suggestions related to the future improvement of university institutional evaluation were submitted to the Ministry of Education, the HEEACT, and universities, respectively, in the final section.