臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：The Role of EFL Teacher Beliefs in Web-supported Writing Instruction and Feedback Practices
書刊名：國立彰化師範大學文學院學報
作者：楊逸君 引用關係／趙毓銓 引用關係／黃仲楷 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yang, Christine Yi-chun／Chao, Joni Yu-chuan／Huang, Chung-kai
出版日期：2014
卷期：9
頁次：頁101-121
主題關鍵詞：教師信念；英語為外語寫作；混合式學習；教師反饋；Teacher beliefs；EFL writing；Blended learning；Teacher feedback
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:67
電腦輔助語言教學與寫作教學課程應用上的研究，尤其是針對以英語為外國語學習者的部分，有很豐碩的成果。而我們也看到電腦輔助語言教學對寫作教學的好處很多，但是有關老師的信念如何影響老師在以網路為輔助的教學環境上反饋的實施，則尚無太多發現。這個研究主旨在於探討老師的信念是否會導致老師在以部落格為工具之寫作課程上所使用的不同的教學方法。兩位從台灣中部大學的老師為此一研究之參與者，因為他們共同創建以實施部落格為網路輔助寫作工具之共同課程大綱，並於課堂上應用以寫作過程為主的類似教學活動。首先這個研究運用質化方法來收集資料，主要以個別和群體訪談為主，用以了解老師之信念。另外兩個反思類型之報告則是要來探討老師們對於錯誤糾正以及內容相關之反饋實施及次數分析。面談資料分析分成四大類: 第一個: 個別老師整體的教學、第二個：老師在不同的情境中對於反饋類型實施的模式、第三個：老師對於錯誤糾正的信念、第四個：老師對於以網路為主的反饋實施的信念。針對質化跟量化資料的進一步分析，我們發現老師對於錯誤是否能夠被糾正的信念影響到他們對於錯誤糾正的選擇，而且老師對於線上教師反饋實施的可行性之信念也有很大的差異，也導致他們對於網路教師反饋實施運用的差別。更進一步而言，教師的教學經驗也會影響他們對於錯誤糾正的反饋實施，還有其他有關寫作內容問題的反饋實施。最後此研究之教學建議顯示出教師信念在運用電腦輔助語言教學上所扮演的重要角色。
Research on writing via computer-assisted language learning (CALL), particularly for learners of English as a foreign language (EFL), has documented a great number of benefits. Yet how teacher beliefs impact their practices in a web-supported learning environment has not been fully explored. This study is to investigate whether teacher beliefs lead to different approaches to utilizing blogs as a tool for a writing curriculum. Two Taiwanese teachers from two universities in central Taiwan were selected because of the co-created syllabus for implementing blogs as the web-supported writing tool in classes and the similar teaching activities that they utilized in process-oriented writing instruction. First, qualitative methods of in-depth individual interviews and a group interview afterwards were conducted for investigating teachers' beliefs. Then two retrospective protocols of teachers' feedback were also explored for their patterns of feedback provision, such as the frequencies of teachers' correction on students' errors as well as their feedback on the content-wise issues. The analysis of interview data identified four categories, namely 1) teachers' teaching in general, 2) teachers' feedback provision in different modalities, 3) teacher beliefs in error correction, and 4) teachers' beliefs in web-based feedback. Further analyses of both qualitative and quantitative data suggest that teacher beliefs in the treatability of errors contributed to their selective error correction. In addition, teacher beliefs in the feasibility of online teacher feedback varied greatly and led to their different adaptation of it. Furthermore, teachers' experience also mediated their implementation of feedback on error correction and content-wise issues. Finally, pedagogical implications of the study suggest the important role that teacher beliefs play in sustaining the practice of CALL.
期刊論文
1.Bitchener, J.、Young, S.、Cameron, D.(2005)。The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing。Journal of Second Language Writing，14(3)，191-205。  new window
2.Liang, M.-Y.(2010)。Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision-related discourse。Language Learning and Technology，14(1)，45-64。  new window
3.Borg, Simon(2011)。The Impact of In-Service Teacher Education on Language Teachers' Beliefs。System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics，39(3)，370-380。  new window
4.Lee, I.(2010)。Writing teacher education and teacher learning: Testimonies of four EFL teachers。Journal of Second Language Writing，19(3)，143-157。  new window
5.Truscott, J.(2004)。Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler。Journal of Second Language Writing，13(4)，337-343。  new window
6.Lim, C. P.、Chai, C. S.(2008)。Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons。British Journal of Educational Technology，39(5)，807-828。  new window
7.Sullivan, Nancy、Pratt, Ellen(1996)。A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom。System，24(4)，491-501。  new window
8.Borg, S.(2003)。Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: a literature review。Language Awareness，12(2)，96-108。  new window
9.Truscott, J.(2010)。Further thoughts on Anthony Bruton's critique of the correction debate。System，38(4)，626-633。  new window
10.Ellis, Rod、Sheen, Younghee、Murakami, Mihoko、Takashima, Hide(2008)。The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context。System，36(3)，353-371。  new window
11.Ferris, D. R.(2010)。Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA。Studies in Second Language Acquisition，32(2)，181-201。  new window
12.Truscott, John(20010600)。Selecting Errors for Selective Error Correction。Concentric--Studies in English Literature and Linguistics，27(2)，225-240。new window  new window
13.Arslan, R. S.、Sahin-Kizil, A.(2010)。How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners?。Computer Assisted Language Learning，23(3)，183-197。  new window
14.Bache, A.、Taslaci, N.(2009)。Learners' perception of blended writing class: blog and face to face。Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education，10(4)，188-202。  new window
15.Baker, A.(2013)。Exploring teachers' knowledge of second language pronunciation techniques: teacher cognitions, observed classroom practices, and student perceptions。TESOL Quarterly。  new window
16.Basturkmen, H.(2012)。Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers' stated beliefs and practices。System，40(2)，282-295。  new window
17.Casanave, C. P.(2003)。Looking ahead to more sociopolitically-oriented case study research in L2 writing scholarship (but should it be called "post-process"?。Journal of Second Language Writing，12(1)，85-102。  new window
18.Deqi, Z.(2005)。The process-oriented approach to ESL/EFL writing instruction and research。CELEA Journal，28(5)，66-70。  new window
19.Diab, R. L.(2005)。Teachers'€™ and students, beliefs about responding to ESL writing: A case study。TESL Canada Journal，23(1)，28-43。  new window
20.Eisenstein-Ebsworth, M.、Schweers, C. W.(1997)。What researchers say and practitioners do: Perspectives on conscious grammar instruction in the ESL classroom。Applied Language Learning，8，237-260。  new window
21.Ellis, R.(2009)。Corrective feedback and teacher development。L2 Journal，1(1)，3-18。  new window
22.Fellner, T.、Apple, M.(2006)。Developing writing fluency' and lexical complexity with blogs。The JALT CALL Journal，2(1)，15-26。  new window
23.Godwin-Jones, R.(2005)。Emerging technologies: Messaging, gaming, peer-to-peer sharing: Language learning strategies & tools for the millennial generation。Language Learning & Technology，9(1)，17-22。  new window
24.Gruber, S.(1995)。Re: Ways we contribute: Students, instructors, and pedagogies in the computer-mediated writing classroom。Computers and Composition，12(1)，61-78。  new window
25.Hartshorn, K. J.、Evans, N. W.、Merrill, P. F.、Sudweeks, R. R.、Strong-Krause, D.、Anderson, N. J.(2010)。Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy。TESOL Quarterly，44(1)，84-109。  new window
26.Hyland, F.(2010)。Future directions in feedback on second language。International Journal of English Studies，10(2)，173-182。  new window
27.Kagan, D. M.、Tippins, D. J.(1991)。How student teachers describe their pupils。Teaching and Teacher Education，7(5)，455-466。  new window
28.Khanalizadeh, B.、Allami, H.(2012)。The Impact of Teachers' Belief on EFL Writing Instruction。Theory and Practice in Language Studies，2(2)，334-342。  new window
29.Kim, C.、Kim, M. K.、Lee, C.、Spector, J. M.、DeMeester, K.(2013)。Teacher beliefs and technology integration。Teaching and Teacher Education，29，76-85。  new window
30.Lee, I.(2008)。Understanding teachers, written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms。Journal of Second Language Writing，17(2)，69-85。  new window
31.Lee, I.(2009)。Ten mismatches between teachers'€™ beliefs and written feedback practice。ELT Journal，63(1)，13-22。  new window
32.Lee, I.、Coniam, D.(2013)。Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong。Journal of Second Language Writing，22(1)，34-50。  new window
33.Lee, M.、Tsai, C.、Chai, C.(2012)。A comparative study of Taiwan, Singapore, and China preservice teachers' epistemic beliefs。The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher。  new window
34.Mak, S. H. Y.(2011)。Tensions between conflicting beliefs of an EFL teacher in teaching practice。RELC，42(1)，53-67。  new window
35.Motteram, G.、Sharma, P.(2009)。Blending learning in a web 2.0 world。International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society，7(2)，83-96。  new window
36.Mynard, J.(2008)。A blog as a tool for reflection for English language learners。The Philippine ESL Journal，1，77-111。  new window
37.Ong, J.、Zhang, L. J.(2010)。Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students' argumentative writing。Journal of Second Language Writing，19(4)，218-233。  new window
38.Phipps, S.、Borg, S.(2009)。Exploring tensions between teachers' grammar teaching beliefs and practices。System，37(3)，380-390。  new window
39.Robinson-Staveley, K.(1990)。The use of computers for writing: Effects on an English composition class。Journal of Educational Computing Research，6(1)，41-48。  new window
40.Sheen, Y.(2007)。The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles。TESOL Quarterly，41(2)，255-283。  new window
41.Teo, T.、Chai, C. S.(2012)。A Cross-Cullural Validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI)。Asia-Pacific Education Researcher，21(3)，618-624。  new window
42.Teo, T.、Chai, C. S.、Hung, D.、Lee, C. B.(2008)。Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre-service teachers。Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education，36(2)，163-174。  new window
43.Wible, D.、Kuo, C.-H.、Chien, F.-Y.、Liu, A.(2001)。A Web-based EFL writing environment: integrating information for learners, teachers, and researchers。Computers &Education，37，297-315。  new window
44.Zhang, D.(2009)。The application of blog in English writing。Journal of Cambridge studies，4(1)，64-72。  new window
45.Zheng, H.(2009)。A review of research on EFL pre-service teachers, beliefs and practices。Journal of Cambridge Studies，4(1)，73-81。  new window
46.Lin, Chih-cheng、Chen, Hao-jan、Liaw, Meei-ling、Liou, Hsien-Chin、Yeh, Yu-li(2005)。Teachers' reflections on infusing the CANDLE project into college English classes。English Teaching and Learning，29(4)，39-64。new window  new window
47.Ferris, Dana R.(2004)。The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?)。Journal of Second Language Writing，13(1)，49-62。  new window
48.Yang, S. H.(2009)。Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice。Educational Technology & Society，12(2)，11-21。  new window
49.Miyazoe, Terumi、Anderson, Terry(2010)。Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting。System，38(2)，185-199。  new window
50.Petko, D.(2012)。Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers' constructivist orientations。Computers & Education，58(4)，1351-1359。  new window
51.Truscott, J.(1996)。The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes。Language Learning，46(2)，327-369。  new window
52.Truscott, J.(2007)。The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately。Journal of Second Language Writing，16(4)，255-272。  new window
53.Ferris, D. R.、Roberts, B.(2001)。Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?。Journal of Second Language Writing，10(3)，161-184。  new window
54.Mishra, P.、Koehler, M. J.(2006)。Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge。Teachers College Record，108(6)，1017-1054。  new window
55.Kagan, D. M.(1992)。Implications of research on teacher belief。Educational Psychologist，27(1)，65-90。  new window
56.Elbaz, Freema(1981)。The Teacher's "Practical Knowledge": Report of a Case Study。Curriculum Inquiry，11(1)，43-71。  new window
57.Pajares, M. F.(1992)。Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct。Review of Educational Research，62(3)，307-332。  new window
58.Ferris, D.(2007)。Preparing teachers to respond to student writing.。Journal of Second Language Writing，16(3)，165-193。  new window
59.Sheen, Younghee(2010)。Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom。Studies in Second Language Acquisition，32(2)，201-234。  new window
60.Shulman, Lee S.(1986)。Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching。Educational Researcher，15(2)，4-14。  new window
會議論文
1.Chao, Y. C. J.、Huang, C. K.(2007)。The effectiveness of computer-mediated communication on enhancing writing process and writing outcomes: The implementation of blog and wiki in the EFL writing class in Taiwan。World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications，3463-3468。  new window
2.Hamp-Lyons, L.、Chen, J.、Mok, J.(2001)。Introducing innovation incrementally: Teacher feedback on student writing。21st annual Thai TESOL international conference，59-66。  new window
3.Su, C. C.(200507)。An open source platform for educators。ICALT 2005. Fifth IEEE International Conference on。IEEE。961-962。  new window
學位論文
1.Chiu, H. H. W.(2008)。Practical understandings: Teachers' beliefs and practices in pronunciation teaching(學士論文)。The University of Texas at Arlington。  new window
2.Kim, T. E.(2006)。Writing instruction for English language learners: teacher beliefs, writing tasks and methods(博士論文)。University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign。  new window
圖書
1.Connelly, F. M.、Clandinin, D. J.(1988)。Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experiences。Teachers College Columbia University。  new window
圖書論文
1.Beauvois, M. H.(1997)。Computer-mediated communication: Technology for improving speaking and writing。Technology-enhanced language learning。Lincolnwood, IL：National Textbook Company。  new window
2.Hamp-Lyons, L.(2006)。The impact of testing practices on teaching: Ideologies and alternatives。International handbook of English language teaching。Norwell：Springer。  new window
3.Ng, J.、Farrell, T. S. C.(2003)。Do teachers, beliefs of grammar teaching match their classroom practices? A Singapore case study。English in Singapore: Research on grammar teaching。Singapore：McGraw Hill。  new window
4.Calderhead, J.(1996)。Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge。Handbook of educational psychology。New York, NK：Simon & Schuster Macmillan。  new window
5.Ferris, D. R.(2006)。Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction。Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：657（臺灣：628，外國：29） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2156165 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67963513
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上