:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用模糊層級分析法探討自來水事業經營策略與經費配置之適配
書刊名:管理實務與理論研究
作者:王明傑呂國禎
作者(外文):Wang, Ming-chiehLu, Kuo-chen
出版日期:2015
卷期:9:2
頁次:頁20-42
主題關鍵詞:模糊層級分析法經營策略預算配置Fuzzy analytic hierarchy processFAHPBusiness strategiesBudgets allocation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:57
本研究以臺灣自來水公司為個案對象,其在經營上除須肩負國家政策任務,又須達成「提供量足、質優、服務好的自來水」之使命,與一般企業以追求利潤最大化,有迥然不同的經營導向。本研究之目的係以臺水公司中長程經營計畫「六年(103~108)經營計畫」所列「目標-策略-方案」為層級架構,設計問卷,對專家學者及臺水高階經理人進行調查,並運用計量之「模糊層級分析法」,研析:一、臺水公司理想的經營策略之執行優先次序;二、經營策略之執行優先次序與其經費配置多寡之適配情形。經實證結果發現,臺水公司17項經營策略中,應將「增加收益」列為第一要務,以利求生存與發展;次應落實「推動精實服務」,以求不浪費;再而「降低成本」及「降低漏水率」,以收節流之效;其後力求「厚植人力資本」,以達企業體質之改造。而排序末段之策略,多屬政策任務、企業社會責任等範疇,表象顯得相對不具急迫性。惟,臺水公司應從中尋找新契機,兼得經營改善與善盡企業社會責任。在策略執行優先次序與經費配置多寡之適配部分,發現「降低成本」策略之經費配置最為不足;「厚植人力資本」策略之經費配置略有不足。另,「落實環境資源管理」及「推動節能環保技術」兩項策略之經費配置有過高虞。
The study subject is Taiwan Water Corporation (TWC), which not only has to execute national policy but also has to accomplish the mission-“sufficient quantity, high quality and good service". It is such different to a general business to pursue profit maximization. The purpose of this study is to apply“Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process" to assess the goodness of fit between business strategies and budgets allocation in TWC .The study framework was based on long- term business plan of TWC, which was established in “Objectives-Strategies-Tactics" system, and then, by questionnaires for experts and top management to analysis. This survey results show that the top five priority strategies are: 1st “Increasing Revenue" to develop business, 2nd “Promoting Lean Service" to not to waste, 3rd “Cutting Cost" and 4th “Reducing Leakage Rate" to reduce cost and 5th “Promoting Human Capital" to reform culture. The end priority strategies are most of national policy and corporation social responsibility, although they are not urgent, TWC may search new niches within them and accomplish CSR. The part of the goodness of fit between business strategies and budgets allocation, this study finds that the budget of “Cutting Cost" is insufficient obviously, “Promoting Human Capital" is not enough a little, then the budgets of “Implementing Environment Resource Management" and “Promoting Energy- Saving Technology" should be adjusted down.
期刊論文
1.郭英峰、陳邦誠(20060300)。應用模糊層級分析法分析消費者對行動加值服務之偏好。電子商務學報,8(1),45-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lasek, M.(1993)。Hierarchical Structures of Fuzzy Ratings in the Analysis of Strategic Goals of Enterprises。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,50(2),127-134。  new window
3.Nguyen, H. L.、Fong, C. M.、Ho, C. T.(2010)。Using Analytical Hierarchy Process in Decision Analysis- The Case of Vietnam State Securities Commission。iBusiness,2,139-144。  new window
4.Chen, Chen-Tung(2000)。Extensions of TOPSIS for Group Decision-making under Fuzzy Environment。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,114(1),1-9。  new window
5.Csutora, R.、Buckley, J. J.(2001)。Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: The Lambda-Max method。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,120(2),181-195。  new window
6.Van Laarhoven, P. J. M.、Pedrycz, W.(1983)。A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,11(1-3),229-241。  new window
7.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1965)。Fuzzy sets。Information and Control,8(3),338-353。  new window
學位論文
1.翁琮信(2014)。獨家經營商品商業模式成功經營策略之研究--以某商品為例(碩士論文)。明道大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳姵彤(2015)。台灣Facebook品牌粉絲專頁之經營策略分析--以美食餐飲類別為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.台灣自來水公司(2014)。六年(103-108)經營計畫。台中市:台灣自來水公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Womack, James P.、Jones, Daniel T.、褚耐安(2007)。精實服務。台北市:經濟新潮社。  延伸查詢new window
3.國立高雄第一科技大學(2014)。台灣自來水公司102年度公司治理評鑑報告。經濟部國營會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Niven, Paul R.、于泳泓(2002)。平衡計分卡最佳實務--按部就班,成功導入。台北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
5.榮泰生(2011)。Expert Choice在分析層級程序法(AHP)之應用。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Saaty, Thomas L.(1980)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。McGraw-Hill。  new window
圖書論文
1.許士軍(2002)。組織變革靠感受--不靠分析。引爆變革之心。臺北:天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE