:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:防制內線交易的危機: 隱匿財報造假,內線交易無罪?
書刊名:中原財經法學
作者:賴英照 引用關係
作者(外文):Lai, In-jaw
出版日期:2015
卷期:34
頁次:頁1-41
主題關鍵詞:內線交易財報造假掏空公司資產未公開的重要消息言論自由不自證己罪Insider tradingFraudulent financial reportsCorporate assets embezzlementUndisclosed material informationFreedom of speechRights against self-incrimination
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:16
上市公司負責人編造假帳,因顧慮消息曝光後股價重跌遭受損失,因而在消息未公開之前,搶先賣出股票,是否構成內線交易?   有判決認為,證交法第 157 條之 1 的「重大影響股價之消息」,僅限於「未公開,但會公開的消息」。編造假帳雖為重大消息,屬於「不會公開的消息」,不在第 157 條之 1 的規範範圍之內。   另有法院認為「重大消息」並未排除所謂「不會公開的消息」。公司負責人在重大消息未公開之前買賣股票,應成立內線交易。   本文認為,內線交易的重大消息,不應將所謂「不會公開」的消息排除在規範範圍之外,否則將使內線交易的防制出現重大的疏漏。
期刊論文
1.Prentice, Robert A.(1999)。The Internet and Its Challenges for the Future of Insider Trading Regulation。HARV. J. L. & Tech,12,263-364。  new window
2.Bainbridge, Stephen M.(20091009)。Ruling On Hackers As Inside Traders: Right In Theory, Wrong On The Law。Legal Backgrounder,24(32),1-4。  new window
3.Kim, Sung Hui(2014)。Insider Trading as Private Corruption。UCLA Law Review,61,928-1008。  new window
4.洪秀芬(20080815)。內線交易之重大消息的判斷--板橋地方法院九五年金訴字第二號刑事判決之簡評。臺灣法學雜誌,110,182-190。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳彥良(20061200)。透明度於公司治理法制之地位--兼論德國與我國證交法中有關重大性消息判斷之認定標準。法令月刊,57(12),18-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.賴英照(20131200)。證券詐欺與資訊平等的拔河--評美國內線交易法制的發展。法令月刊,64(12),48-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Anderson, Alden(2013)。The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: Hacking into the Authorization Debate。JURIMETRICS J.,53,447-466。  new window
8.Bebel, Christopher J.(1998)。A Detailed Analysis of United States v. O'Hagan: Onward Through the Evolution of the Federal Securities Laws。La. L. Rev.,59,1-61。  new window
9.DiGiovanni, Mark F.(2012)。Weeding Out a New Theory of Insider Trading Liability and Cultivating an Heirloom Variety: A Proposed Response to SEC v. Dorozhko。George Mason Law Review,19,593-627。  new window
10.Dosh, Ryan E.(2014)。The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: As Conflict Rages on, the United States v. Nosal Ruling Provides Employers Clear Guidance。Loy. L. A. L. Rev.,47,901-915。  new window
11.Doyle, Sean F.(2010)。Simplifying the Analysis: The Second Circuit Lays Out a Straightforward Theory of Fraud in SEC v. Dorozhko。N. C. L. Rev.,89,357-386。  new window
12.Fedders, John M.(1998)。Qualitative Materiality: The Birth, Struggles, and Demise of an Unworkable Standard。Catholic University Law Review,48,41-91。  new window
13.Jakopchek, Kevin(2014)。“Obtaining” the Right Result: A Novel Interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act That Provides Liability for Insider Theft Without Overbreadth。J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY,104,605-633。  new window
14.Karol, Brain A.(2011)。Deception Absent Duty: Computer Hackers & Section 10(b) Liability。UNIV. OF MIAMI Bus. L. REV.,19,185-218。  new window
15.Miller, Alison B.(2014)。Navigating the Disclosure Dilemma: Corporate Illegality and the Federal Securities Laws。GEO. L. J.,102,1647-1684。  new window
16.Nagy, Donna M.(1998)。Reframing the Misapproprivation Theory of Insider Trading Liability: A Post-O'Hagan Suggestion。Ohio State Law Journal,59,1223-1310。  new window
17.Odian, Elizabeth A.(2011)。SEC v. Dorozhko's Affirmative Misrepresentation Theory of Insider Trading: Improper Means to a Proper End。Marq. L. Rev.,94,1313-1349。  new window
18.Pollman, Elizabeth(2014)。A Corporate Right to Privacy。Minnesota Law Review,99(1),27-88。  new window
19.Roiter, Eric D.(1982)。Illegal Corporate Practices and the Disclosure Requirement of the Federal Securities Laws。Fordham Law Review,50,781-813。  new window
20.Sauer, Richard C.(2007)。The Erosion of the Materiality Standard in the Enforcement of the Federal Securities Laws。The Business Lawyer,62(2),317-357。  new window
21.劉連煜(20100200)。重大內線消息之認定--最高法院九十八年度臺上字第六四九二號判決評釋。月旦裁判時報,1,126-134。  延伸查詢new window
22.Coles, Kathleen(2006)。The Dilemma of the Remote Tippee。GONZ. L. Rev.,41,181-236。  new window
23.Heminway, Joan Macleod(2003)。Materiality Guidance in the Context of Insider Trading: A Call for Action。Am. U. L. Rev.,52,1131-1212。  new window
學位論文
1.賴禹綸(2014)。從比較法架構我國內線交易相關法制--以企業併購為中心(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bloomenthal, Harold S.、Wolff, Samuel(2002)。Securities and Federal Corporate Law。Eagan, Minn.:West Group。  new window
2.劉連煜(2012)。內線交易構成要件。元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.王兆鵬(2009)。刑事訴訟講義。台北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
4.林鈺雄(2007)。刑事訴訟法(上冊):總則編。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bloomenthal, Harold S.、Wolff, Samuel(2001)。International Capital Markets and Securities Regulation。Eagan, Minn.:West Group。  new window
6.Coffee, John、Seligman, Joel、Sale, Hillary(2007)。Securities Regulation。London, England:Foundation Press。  new window
7.Langevoort, Donald C.(2009)。Insider Trading: Regulation, Enforcement & Prevention。Eagan, Minn:Thomson Reuters/West。  new window
8.Loss, Louis、Seligman, Joel(2005)。Securities Regulation。Wolfers Kluwer。  new window
9.Loss, Louis、Seligman, Joel、Paredes, Troy(2009)。Securities Regulation。New York, NY:Aspen Publishers。  new window
10.Wang, William K. S.、Steinberg, Marc I.(2010)。Insider Trading。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Moloney, Niamh(2008)。EC Securities Regulation。New York, NY:Oxford Univ. Press。  new window
12.Soderquist, Larry D.、Gabaldon, Theresa A.(2006)。Securities Regulation。London:Foundation Press。  new window
13.Cox, James D.、Hillman, Robert W.、Langevoort, Donald C.(2009)。Securities Regulation, Cases and Materials。New York:Aspen Publishers。  new window
14.賴英照(201102)。股市遊戲規則:最新證券交易法解析。台北:賴英照。  延伸查詢new window
15.Loss, Louis、Seligman, Joel(2004)。Fundamentals of Securities Regulation。Aspen Publishers。  new window
16.賴英照(2014)。最新證券交易法解析:股市遊戲規則。賴英照。  延伸查詢new window
17.Hazen, Thomas Lee(2006)。The Law of Securities Regulation。St. Paul, Minn.:West Group。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE