:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國不實言論之言論自由保障
書刊名:國立中正大學法學集刊
作者:楊智傑
作者(外文):Yang, Chih-chieh
出版日期:2021
卷期:71
頁次:頁121-192
主題關鍵詞:不實言論煽動違法言論Alvarez案不實競選言論社會秩序維護法第六十三條False speechInciting unlawful speechThe Alvarez caseFalse statement in political campaignsArticle 63 of the Social Order Maintenance Act
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:95
  • 點閱點閱:11
期刊論文
1.許家馨(20080300)。美國誹謗侵權法歸責體系初探--以歸責內涵及查證義務為中心 。月旦法學,154,111-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.許家馨(20060500)。釋字第五○九號解釋應否適用於民事案件?--為最高法院新新聞案判決翻案。月旦法學,132,102-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.法治斌(19860600)。論美國妨害名譽法制之憲法意義。政大法學評論,33,81-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.謝煜偉(20140900)。群眾恐慌下的恐嚇公眾危安罪:北捷隨機殺人案後續事件解析。月旦法學教室,143,69-76。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉靜怡(20170800)。事前審查所為何事?--司法院釋字第七四四號解釋簡評。月旦法學,267,194-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Schauer, Frederick(2004)。The Boundaries of the First Amendment: A Preliminary Exploration of Constitutional Salience。Harvard Law Review,117(6),1765-1809。  new window
7.Pontier, Jean-Marie、吳秦雯(20190900)。假新聞之控制。月旦法學,292,30-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.楊智傑(20170700)。言論自由事前審查之審查標準--釋字第744號解釋與美國審查標準比較。憲政時代,43(1),89-143。  延伸查詢new window
9.林奕宏(20191228)。簡評選罷法修正草案之緊急限制刊播令。臺灣法學雜誌,382,1-20。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳朝政(20151200)。我國選舉訴訟之判決分析與制度檢討。東吳政治學報,33(4),73-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.劉靜怡(2005)。言論自由:第三講政治性言論與非政治性言論。月旦法學教室,30,56-65。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉靜怡(2012)。說謊也是言論自由?。月旦法學教室,122,6-8。  延伸查詢new window
13.鍾禛(20180100)。論國家對於假消息之管制模式及其規範分析--國際宣言與比較法的觀點。憲政時代,43(3),425-476。  延伸查詢new window
14.蘇慧婕(20190900)。假訊息管制與資訊揭露義務--以選罷法、公投法及其修正草案為中心。月旦法學,292,42-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Goldman, Lee(2008)。False Campaign Advertising and the "Actual Malice" Standard。Tul. L. Rev.,82(3)。  new window
16.Lieffring, Staci(2013)。First Amendment and the Right to Lie: Regulating Knowingly False Campaign Speech After United States v. Alvarez。Minn. L. Rev.,97。  new window
17.Marshall, William P.(2004)。False Campaign Speech and the First Amendment。U. Pa. L. Rev.,153。  new window
18.McMillan, Imara(2019)。Enforcement through the Network: The Network Enforcement Act and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights。Chi. J. Int'l,20。  new window
19.Moon, Laura E.(2019)。A New Role for Social Network Providers: NetzDG and the Communication Decency Act。TRNATLCP,28。  new window
20.Redisha, Martin H.、Pereyraaa, Julio(2020)。Resolving the First Amendment's Civil War: Political Fraud and the Democratic Goals of Free Expression。Ariz. L. Rev.,62。  new window
21.Schauer, Frederick(2010)。Facts and the First Amendment。UCLA Law Review,57(4),897-920。  new window
22.Sellers, Joshua S.(2018)。Legislating against Lying in Campaigns and Elections。Okla. L. Rev.,71。  new window
23.Tompros, Louis W.、Crudo, Richard A.、Pfeiffer, Alexis、Boghossiana, Rahel(2017)。The Constitutionality of Criminalizing False Speech Made on Social Networking Sites in a Post-Alvarez, Social Media-Obsessed World。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology,31,65-109。  new window
24.Wood, Julia K.(2011)。Truth, Lies, and Stolen Valor: A Case for Protecting False Statements of Fact under the First Amendment。Duke L. J.,61。  new window
25.Zenora, Jason(2016)。A Reckless Disregard for the Truth? The Constitutional Right to Lie in Politics。Campbell L. Rev.,38。  new window
26.Zipursky, Rebecca(2019)。Nuts about Netz: The Network Enforcement Act and Freedom of Expression。Fordham Int'l L. J.,42。  new window
27.黃銘輝(20190900)。假新聞、社群媒體與網路時代的言論自由。月旦法學,292,5-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃銘輝(2018)。從言論自由的觀點初論網路假新聞的管制。匯流、治理、通傳會論文集。風雲論壇有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.林子儀(2002)。言論自由與內亂罪--「明顯而立即危險原則」之闡釋。言論自由與新聞自由。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林子儀(2002)。言論自由與名譽權保障之新發展。言論自由與新聞自由。  延伸查詢new window
4.林子儀(20020000)。言論自由導論。臺灣憲法之縱剖橫切。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE