臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：新興溝通科技與言論自由--可能之定位暨思維
書刊名：國立中正大學法學集刊
作者：許炳華
作者(外文)：Hsu, Pin-hua
出版日期：2021
卷期：70
頁次：頁1-70
主題關鍵詞：言論自由；美國憲法增修條文第1條；言論市場；接受訊息的權利；商業性言論；搜尋偏愛；廉價言論；中度審查；機器人言論；被迫言論；Freedom of speech；The first amendment；Marketplace of ideas；Right to receive information；Commercial speech；Search bias；Cheep speech；Intermediate scrutiny；Robot speech；Compelled speech
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:141
  • 點閱點閱:13
期刊論文
1.劉靜怡(20110500)。網路內容管制與言論自由--以網路中介者的角色為討論重心。月旦法學，192，63-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Wu, Tim(2013)。Machine Speech。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，161，1495-1533。  new window
3.劉靜怡(20110900)。媒體所有權、觀點多元化與言論自由保障：美國法制的觀察。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，40(3)，1089-1173。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Abbas, Tania(2013)。U. S. Preservation Requirements and EU Data Protection: Headed for Collision?。Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.，36，257-287。  new window
5.Whitman, James Q.(2004)。The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty。Yale Law Journal，113(6)，1151-1221。  new window
6.Ingber, Stanley(1984)。The Marketplace of Ideas: a Legitimizing Myth。Duke Law Journal，1984(1)，1-91。  new window
7.蘇慧婕(20121215)。淺論社群網路時代中的言論自由爭議：以臉書「按讚」為例。臺灣法學雜誌，214，28-37。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bracha, Oren(2014)。The Folklore of Informationalism: The Case of Search Engine Speech。Fordham L. Rev.，82，1629-1687。  new window
9.Grimmelmann, James(2014)。Speech Engines。Minn. L. Rev.，98，868-952。  new window
10.Pasquale, Frank(2008)。Asterisk Revisited: Debating a Right of Reply on Search Results。J. Bus. & Tec. L.，30，61-85。  new window
11.劉孔中(20141200)。關鍵字廣告之商標法與競爭法爭議--以Google為例。月旦法學，235，69-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Bambauer, Jane(2014)。Is Data Speech?。The Stanford Law Review，66(1)，57-120。  new window
13.黃銘傑(19980100)。美國法上的言論自由與商業廣告--兼論司法院大法官會議釋字第四一四號解釋。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，27(2)，347-393。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳仲嶙(20151200)。生物資料庫生物檢體與個人資料的國際傳輸--對我國法制之分析與建議。醫事法學，22(2)，99-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Fisk, Catherine L.、Chemerinsky, Erwin(2013)。Political Speech and Association Rights after Knox v. Seiu Local 1000。Cornell L. Rev.，98，1023-1091。  new window
16.Volokh, Eugene(2003)。Freedom of Speech and Intellectual Property: Some Thoughts After Eldred, 44 Liquormart, and Bartnicki。Houston Law Review，40。  new window
17.Schauer, Frederick(2004)。The Boundaries of the First Amendment: A Preliminary Exploration of Constitutional Salience。Harvard Law Review，117(6)，1765-1809。  new window
18.黃銘傑(20190600)。人工智慧發展對法律及法律人的影響。月旦法學教室，200，51-54。  延伸查詢new window
19.Lamo, Madeline、Calo, Ryan(2019)。Regulating Bot Speech。UCLA Law Review，66。  new window
20.楊智傑(20170700)。言論自由事前審查之審查標準--釋字第744號解釋與美國審查標準比較。憲政時代，43(1)，89-143。  延伸查詢new window
21.Hasen, Richard L.(2018)。Cheap Speech and What It Has Done (to American Democracy)。First Amendment Law Review，16(Symposium)，200-231。  new window
22.黃昭元(20040500)。憲法權利限制的司法審查標準：美國類型化多元標準模式的比較分析。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，33(3)，45-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.陳柏良(20200700)。AI時代之分裂社會與民主--以美國法之表意自由與觀念市場自由競爭理論為中心。月旦法學，302，109-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Ballanco, Michael J.(2013)。Searching for the First Amendment: An Inquisitive Free Speech Approach to Search Engine Rankings。Geo. Mason U. C. R. L. J.，24。  new window
25.Benjamin, Stuart M.(2013)。Algorithms and Speech。U. Pa. L. Rev.，161。  new window
26.Bhagwat, Ashutosh(2017)。When Speech is Not "Speech"。Ohio St. L. J.，78，839-885。  new window
27.Bibet-Kalinyak, Isabelle(2012)。A Critical Analysis of Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc.: Pandora's Box at Best。Food & Drug L. J.，67。  new window
28.Blackman, Josh(2014)。What Happens if Data is Speech?。U. Pa. J. Const. Heightened Scrutiny，16。  new window
29.Brotman, Julia K.(2018)。Access, Transparency, and Control: A Proposal to Restore the Marketplace of Ideas by Regulating Search Engine Algorithms。Whittier L. Rev.，39。  new window
30.Butler, Daniel(2014)。Avoiding the First Amendment's Crosshairs: Revisiting Precedents & Refining Arguments in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association。U. Miami L. Rev.，68。  new window
31.Cannon, Alex W.(2009)。Regulating AdWords: Consumer Protection in a Market Where the Commodity Is Speech。Seton Hall L. Rev.，39。  new window
32.Cohen, Harlan(2018)。Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc.。Am. J. Int'l L.，112。  new window
33.Collins, John P. Jr.(1997)。Speaking in Code: Bernstein v. United States Department of State, 922 F. Supp. 1426 (N. D. Cal. 1996); Bernstein v. United States Department of State, 945 F. Supp. 1279 (N. D. Cal. 1996)。Yale L. J.，106。  new window
34.Fox, Ryan Christopher(2002)。Old Law and New Technology: The Problem of Computer Code and the First Amendment。UCLA L. Rev.，49。  new window
35.Fromer, Jeanne C.(2001)。Sixth Circuit Classifies Computer Source Code as Protected Speech: Junger V. Daley, 209 F. 3d 481 (6th Cir. 2000)。Harv. L. Rev.，114。  new window
36.Halpern, Steven E.(2000)。Harmonizing the Convergence of Medium, Expression, and Functionality: A Study of the Speech Interest in Computer Software。Harv. J. L. & Tech.，14。  new window
37.Johnson, Bruce E. H.(2018)。Norton, Helen & Skover, David, Panel 1: Robotic Speech and the First Amendment。Seattle U. L. Rev.，41。  new window
38.Jones, Meg Leta(2018)。Silencing Bad Bots: Global, Legal and Political Questions for Mean Machine Communication。Comm. L. & Pol'y，23。  new window
39.Joo, Thomas W.(2014)。The Worst Test of Truth: The "Marketplace of Ideas" as Faulty Metaphor。Tul. L. Rev.，89(2)。  new window
40.Kerr, Orin S.(2000)。Are We Overprotecting Code? Thoughts on First-Generation Internet Law。Wash. & Lee L. Rev.，57。  new window
41.Langvardt, Kyle(2016)。The Doctrinal Toll of "Information as Speech。Loy. U. Chi. L. J.，47。  new window
42.Levi, Lili(2018)。Real "Fake News" and Fake "Fake News"。First Amendment Law Review，16，232-327。  new window
43.Mandelman, Joel C.(1998)。Lest We Walk into the Well: Guarding the Keys? Encrypting the Constitution: To Speak, Search and Seize in Cyberspace。Alb. L. J. Sei. & Tech.，8。  new window
44.Mart, Susan Nevelow(2003)。The Right to Receive Information。Law Libr. J.，95，175-189。  new window
45.Massaro, Toni M.、Norton, Helen(2016)。Siri-ously? Free Speech Rights and Artificial Intelligence。Northwestern University Law Review，110(5)，1169-1194。  new window
46.Massaro, Toni M.、Norton, Helen、Kaminski, Margot(2017)。SIRI-OUSLY 2.0: What Artificial Intelligence Reveals about the First Amendment。Minn. L. Rev.，101，2481-2525。  new window
47.McGoldrick, James M. Jr.(2006)。United States v. O'Brien Revisited: of Burning Things, Waving Things, and G-Strings。U. Mem. L. Rev.，36。  new window
48.McGoldrick, James M. Jr.(2008)。Symbolic Speech: A Message from Mind to Mind。Okla. L. Rev.，61。  new window
49.Moerke, Katherine A.(2000)。Free Speech to a Machine? Encryption Software Source Code Is Not Constitutionally Protected Speech under the First Amendment。Minn. L. Rev.，84。  new window
50.Nguyen, Thinh(1997)。Cryptography, Export Controls, and the First Amendment in Bernstein v. United States Department of State。Harv. J. L. & Tech.，10。  new window
51.Norton, Helen(2018)。Robotic Speakers and Human Listeners。Seattle University Law Review，41，1145-1151。  new window
52.Ocrant, Yvonne C.(1998)。A Constitutional Challenge to Encryption Export Regulations: Software Is Speechless。DePaul L. Rev.，48。  new window
53.Plotkin, Robert(2003)。Fighting Keywords: Translating the First Amendment to Protect Software Speech。U. Ill. J. L. Tech. & Pol'y，2003。  new window
54.Post, Robert(2000)。Encryption Source Code and the First Amendment。Berkeley Tech. L. J.，15。  new window
55.Post, Robert、Shanor, Amanda(2015)。Adam Smith's First Amendment。Harv. L. Rev. F.，128。  new window
56.Ross, Patrick Ian(1998)。Bernstein v. United States Department of State。Berkeley Tech. L. J.，13。  new window
57.Samp, Richard(2011)。Sorrell v. IMS Health: Protecting Free Speech or Resurrecting Lochner?。Cato Sup. Ct. Rev.，2011。  new window
58.Tien, Lee(2000)。Publishing Software as a Speech Act。Berkeley Tech. L. J.，15。  new window
59.Tutt, Andrew(2012)。Software Speech。Stan. L. Rev. Online，65。  new window
60.Tutt, Andrew(2014)。The New Speech。Hastings Const. L. Q.，41。  new window
61.Voigt, Mark W.(1987)。VISA Denials on Ideological Grounds and the First Amendment Right to Receive Information: The Case for Stricter Judicial Scrutiny。Cumb. L. Rev.，17。  new window
62.Volokh, Eugene、Falk, Donald(2012)。First Amendment Protection for Search Engine Search Results。J. L. Econ. & Pol'y，8。  new window
63.Witt, Laurel(2017)。Preventing the Rogue Bot Journalist: Protection from Non-Human Defamation。Colo. Tech. L. J.，15。  new window
64.Wolf, Andrew J.(2013)。Detailing Commercial Speech: What Pharmaceutical Marketing Reveals about Bans on Commercial Speech。Wm. & Mary Bill Rits. J.，21。  new window
65.Zeitz, Boryana(2002)。The Boundaries of Computer Expression: Is Source Code Speech?。UCLA J.L. & Tech. Note，2002。  new window
66.Richards, Neil M.(2015)。Why Data Privacy Law Is (Mostly) Constitutional。William and Mary law review，56(4)，1501-1533。  new window
67.劉靜怡(20140401)。用丟鞋和辦公祭傳達政治抗議訊息，該受處罰嗎？。臺灣法學雜誌，245，131-135。  延伸查詢new window
68.Post, Robert C.(1995)。Recuperating First Amendment Doctrine。Stanford Law Review，47，1249-1281。  new window
69.黃銘輝(20190900)。假新聞、社群媒體與網路時代的言論自由。月旦法學，292，5-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
70.Gasser, Urs(2006)。Regulating Search Engines: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead。Yale J. L. & Tech.，8，124-157+201。  new window
71.Bracha, Oren、Pasquale, Frank(2008)。Federal search commission? Access, fairness, and accountability in the law of search。Cornell Law Review，93，1149-1210。  new window
72.Chandler, Jennifer A.(2007)。A right to reach an audience: An approach to intermediary bias on the internet。Hofstra Law Review，35，1095-1137。  new window
73.Volokh, Eugene(1995)。Cheap speech and what it will do。Yale Law Journal，104，1805-1850。  new window
圖書
1.李念祖(2006)。案例憲法III（上）：人權保障的內容。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳庚(2003)。憲法之解釋與適用。台北：吳庚。  延伸查詢new window
3.許育典(2016)。憲法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
4.李惠宗(2015)。憲法要義。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Collins, Ronald、Skover, David(2018)。Robotica: Speech Rights and Artificial Intelligence。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.陳慈陽(2005)。憲法學。元照。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Hyman, David A.，Franklin, David J.(2015)。Search Neutrality and Search Bias: An Empirical Perspective on the Impact of Architecture and Labeling Remedies，http://ssrn.com/abstract=2260942。  new window
2.Grimmelmann, James。Speech In, Speech Out，https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3195421。  new window
其他
1.(20190413)。學生團體串連抵制假新聞．要求媒體善盡查證責任，https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201904130065.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
2.江雅綺(20190429)。面對網路資訊戰的法治策略，https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1284822。  延伸查詢new window
3.林子鈞(20190110)。「言論審查工廠」全面崛起」：當Facebook走上了一條和中國極度接近的道路，https://buzzorange.com/techorange/2019/01/10/when-facebook-turn-to-china/。  延伸查詢new window
4.(20181002)。政府打擊假新聞．賴清德：最大亂源是中國，https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=437086。  延伸查詢new window
5.(20190506)。政府為遏止假消息，第一波修改「災害防救法」、「糧食管理法」、「農產品市場交易法」、「核子事故緊急應變辦法」、「廣播電視法」，第二波修改「刑法」、「陸海空軍刑法」，都還在立院審議。  延伸查詢new window
6.盧素梅(20190419)。政院硬起來！蘇貞昌鐵腕修法．電視網路散布「假新聞」關3年，https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=529167。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20170315)。管假新聞？林全：任何立法不會妨害言論自由，https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170315000351-260102?chdtv。  延伸查詢new window
8.Balkin, Jack M.。Free Speech in the Algorithmic Society: Big Data, Private Governance, and New School Speech Regulation，https://ssrn.com/abstract=3038939。  new window
9.Daws, Ryan(20180524)。Bill Forcing AI Bots to Reveal Themselves Faces EFF Opposition，https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/2018/05/24/bill-ai-bot-reveal-eff/。  new window
10.Houser, Kristin。Should Bots Have a Right to Free Speech? This Non-Profit Thinks So，https://futurism.com/robots-free-speech-rights。  new window
11.Lamo, Madeline，Calo, Ryan。Anonymous Robot Speech，https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/werobot/wp-content/uploads/sites/47/2018/02/Anonymous-Robot-Speech-We-Robot-2018.pdf。  new window
12.Schauer, Frederick。Categories and the First Amendment: A Play in Three Acts，https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/73973074.pdf。  new window
13.Study on the Human Rights Dimensions of Automated Data Processing Techniques (in Particular Algorithms) and Possible Regulatory Implications，https://rm.coe.int/algorithms-and-human-rights-en-rev/16807956b5。  new window
14.Stern, Mark Joseph。Are Google Search Results Protected by the First Amendment?，https://slate.com/technology/2014/11/are-google-results-free-speech-protected-by-the-first-amendment.html。  new window
15.Timberg, Craig(20180215)。Russia Used Mainstream Media to Manipulate American Voters，https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/russia-used-mainstream-media-to-manipulate-american-voters/2018/02/15/85f7914e-11a7-11e8-9065-e55346f6de81_story.html?utm_term=.1c1db24271ed。  new window
16.Wiley, Sarah。Algorithms, Machine Learning, and Speech: The Future of the First Amendment in a Digital World，https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/190586/Wiley_umn_0130M_18295.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y。  new window
17.Wu, Tim(20120619)。Free Speech for Computers?，https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/20/opinion/free-speech-for-computers.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.林子儀(19990000)。言論自由之理論基礎。言論自由與新聞自由。臺北：元照出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：519（臺灣：512，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1541412 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67353190
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上