條件評估法處理抗議性樣本及無法確定／不知道樣本之一般化架構_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	條件評估法處理抗議性樣本及無法確定／不知道樣本之一般化架構
書刊名：	農業與經濟
作者：	吳珮瑛／陳思豪／劉哲良
作者(外文)：	Wu, Pei-ing／Chen, Si-hao／Liou, Je-liang
出版日期：	2014
卷期：	53
頁次：	頁1-54
主題關鍵詞：	雙元常態模型；Tobit模型；雙界二元選擇加開放支付方式；國家公園；願付價值；Bivariate model；Tobit model；Double-bounded with open question follow-up；National park；Willingness to pay；Inverse mills ratio
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:3 共同引用:18 點閱:20

本文主要建立一可處理條件評估法所有誘導支付方式下，產生之抗議性或無法確定／不知道樣本的一般化架構，所有誘導支付方式可歸納成「呈現WTP金額誘導支付」、「純選擇誘導支付」及「選擇加開放誘導支付」等三大類詢價模式。此一架構除了可以更有效、更簡易的估計方式處理抗議性樣本外，尚可合併處理抗議性樣本及過去極少涉及的無法確定／不知道樣本。而此一般化架構將以雙界二元選擇加開放條件評估法，所調查完成評估墾丁國家公園價值之資料為驗證，墾丁國家公園的抗議性與無法確定／不知道樣本佔整體樣本約37%，結果顯示本文所建立的一般化架構，在處理只涵蓋抗議性樣本或是同時處理抗議性及無法確定／不知道樣本之結果，比過去將抗議性樣本和無法確定／不知道樣本刪除，或視抗議性樣本為零時更有效。同時也讓過去將抗議性樣本及無法確定／不知道樣本刪除，估計而來的平均WTP之高估情形，或是將抗議性樣本視為零支付處理方式，所產生之平均WTP之低估情形得以避免。然結果則一致顯示，不論是傳統將抗議性樣本及無法確定／不知道樣本刪除，或以不當方式納入抗議性樣本的處理方式，均使得對應母體總數因而縮減或／及平均WTP低估，因此傳統處理方式均低估資源總價值，低估比例最高達142%、最少為31%。

以文找文

The purpose of this study is to construct a general framework to treat the protest bidders and uncertainty/don't know responses in contingent valuation method (CVM). This framework is applicable to all kinds of elicitation methods in CVM. All types of elicitation methods are classified as three groups. They are ＂WTP revelation＂, ＂pure discrete choice,＂ and ＂discrete choice with open question follow-up.＂ Such framework is much more efficient and easier estimation in treating protest bidders and/or handling uncertainty/don't know responses which are rarely accounted for. The estimation results from this general framework will be compared with those traditional treatments. Traditionally, it is normally delete the protest and uncertainly/don't know responses or treat the protest bidders with zero willingness to pay. This framework is applied to the case of benefit evaluation of Kenting National Park conducted by double-bounded discrete with open question follow-up elicitation method. There is 37% of protest and uncertainty/don't know bidders in this survey. The results from this general framework show that the treatment of protest responses only or the treatment of protest and uncertainty/don't know responses have relatively high efficiency than those from the traditional treatments with such high percentage of protest and uncertainty/don't know responses for this sample. The estimated average willingness to pay (WTP) is over estimated while the protests and uncertainty/don't know responses are excluded traditionally. On the other hand, the estimated average WTP is under estimated while the protests are treated as zero WTP responses. However, total benefit of the National Park is under estimated in either treatment of protests and/or don't know bidders. The under estimation is caused either by the shrink of population due to the elimination of protests or by zero WTP responses for protesters. The total benefit is under estimated by 142% as the highest and at least by 31%.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	吳珮瑛、鄭琬方、蘇明達(20040600)。複檻式決策過程模型之建構：條件評估法中抗議性答覆之處理。農業與經濟，32，29-69。延伸查詢
2.	Martίnez-Espineira, R.(2006)。A box-cox double-hurdle model of wildlife valuation: The citizens perspective。Ecological Economics，58(1)，192-208。
3.	Strazzera, E.、Genius, M.、Scarpa, R.、Hutchinson, G.(2003)。The Effect of Protest Votes on the Estimates of WTP for Use Values of Recreational Sites。Environmental and Resource Economics，25(4)，461-476。
4.	Hansen, T. B.(1997)。The willingness-to-pay for the royal theatre in Copenhagen as a public good。Journal of Cultural Economics，21(1)，1-28。
5.	吳珮瑛、林佳穎、蘇明達(20050400)。抗議性樣本與答覆「無法確定」樣本之特質：這一群人對假設市場價值評估結果之影響。調查研究，17，65-110。延伸查詢
6.	陳宛君、廖學誠(20110700)。宜蘭海岸遊憩效益之經濟評估--以外澳海灘為例。工程環境會刊，27，19-37。延伸查詢
7.	Ahmed, S. U.、Gotoh, K.(2007)。The Choice of Elicitation Method in CVM and Their Impact。Reports of Graduate School of Engineering, Nagasaki University，37(68)，47-52。
8.	Alberini, A.、Boyle, K.、Welsh, M.(2003)。Analysis of Contingent Valuation Data with Multiple Bids and Response Options Allowing Respondents to Express Uncertainty。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management，45(1)，40-62。
9.	Asafu-Adjaye, J.、Tapsuwan, S.(2008)。A Contingent Valuation Study of Scuba Diving Benefits: Case Study in Mo Ko Similan Marine National Park, Thailand。Tourism Management，29，1122-1130。
10.	Ayidiy, S. A.、McClendon, M. J.(1990)。Response Effects on Mail Surveys。Public Opinion Quarterly，54(2)，229-247。
11.	Balcombe, K.、Fraster, I.(2009)。Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation with Don’t Know Responses and Misreporting。Journal of Applied Econometerics，24(7)，1137-1152。
12.	Botzen, W. J. W.、van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.(2012)。Monetary Valuation of Insurance against Flood Risk under Climate Change。International Economic Review，53(3)，1005-1025。
13.	Bourguignon, F.、Fournier, M.、Gurgand, M.(2007)。Selection Bias Corrections Based on the Multinomial Logit Model: Monte Carlo Comparisons。Journal of Economics Surveys，21(1)，174-205。
14.	Chen, X. L.、Liu, X. Q.、Li, F. Z.(2013)。Comparative Study on Mode Split Discrete Choice Models。Journal of Modern Transportation，21(4)，266-272。
15.	Dziegielewska, D. A.、Mendelsohn, R.(2007)。Does No Mean No? A Protest Methodology。Environmental and Resource Economics，38(1)，71-87。
16.	Fonta, W. M.、Ichoku, H. E.、Kabubo-Mariara, J.(2010)。The Effect of Protest Zeros on Estimates of Willingness to Pay in Healthcare Contingent Valuation Analysis。Applied Health Economics and Health Policy，8(4)，225-237。
17.	Groothuis, P. A.、Whitehead, J. C.(2002)。Does Don’t Know Mean No? Analysis of Don’t Know Responses in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions。Applied Economics，34(15)，1935-1940。
18.	Hanemann, W. M.(1985)。Some Issues in Continous and Discrete-Response Contingent Valuation Studies。Northestern Journal of Agricultural Economics，14(1)，1255-1263。
19.	Havet, N.、Morelle, M.、Remonnay, R.、Carrere, M.(2012)。Econometric Treatment of Few Protest Response in Willingness-To-Pay Studies: An Application in Health Care。Recherches Économiques de Louvain，78(2)，53-74。
20.	Jorgensen, B. S.、Syme, G. J.、Bishop, B. J.、Nancarrow, B. E.(1999)。Protest Response in Contingent Valuation。Environment and Resource Economics，14(1)，131-150。
21.	Jones, N.、Sophoulis, C. M.、Malesios, C.(2008)。Economic Valuation of Coastal Water Quality and Protest Responses: A Case Study in Mitilini, Greece。The Journal of Socio-Economics，37(6)，2478-2491。
22.	Leung, G. M.、Yeung, R. Y. T.、Wong, I. O. L.、Castan-Cameo, S.、Jonston, J. M.(2006)。Times Costs of Waiting, Doctor-Shopping and Private-Public Sector Imbalance: Microdata Evidence from Hong Kong。Health Policy，76(1)，1-12。
23.	Lindsey, G.(1994)。Market Models, Protest Bids, and Outliers in Contingent Valuation。Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management，120(1)，121-129。
24.	Meyerhoff, J.、Bartczak, A.、Liebe, U.(2012)。Protester or Non-Protester: A Binary State? On the Use (and Non-Use) of Latent Class Models to Analyse Protesting in Economic Valuation。The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics，56(3)，438-454。
25.	Poe, G. S.、Seeman, I.、McLaughlin, J.、Mehl, E.、Dietz, M.(1988)。Don’t Know Boxes in Factual Questions in a Mail Questionnaire: Effects on Level and Quality of Response。Public Opinion Quarterly，52(2)，212-222。
26.	Presser, S.、Schuman, H.(1980)。The Measurement of a Middle Position in Attitude Surveys。Public Opinion Quarterly，44(1)，70-85。
27.	Ready, R. C.、Navrud, S.、Dubourg, W. R.(2001)。How Do Respondents with Uncertain Willingness to Pay Answer Contingent Valuation Questions?。Land Economics，77(3)，315-326。
28.	Shaikh, S. L.、Sun, L.、Kooten, G. C. V.(2007)。Treating Respondent Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of Empirical Treatments。Ecological Economics，62(1)，115-125。
29.	Wang, H.(1997)。Treatment of Don’t Know Response in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model。Journal of Environment Economics and Management，32(2)，219-232。
30.	Yu, Xiaohua、Abler, David(2010)。Incorporating Zero and Missing Responses into CVM with Open-Ended Bidding: Willingness to Pay for Blue Skies in Beijing。Environment and Development Economics，15(5)，535-556。
31.	Eulalia, D. M.(2001)。Alternative Approaches to Obtain Optimal Bid Values in Contingent Valuation Studies and to Model Protest Zeros: Estimating the Determinants of Individuals' Willingness to Pay for Home Care Services in Day Case Surgery。Health Economics，10(2)，101-118。
32.	Langford, I. H.、Bateman, I. J.、Langford, H. D.(1996)。A Multilevel Modeling Approach to Triple-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation。Environmental and Resource Economics，7(3)，197-211。
33.	Pruckner, G. J.(1995)。Agricultural Landscape Cultivation in Austria: An Application of the CVM。European Review of Agricultural Economics，22(2)，173-190。
34.	Scarpa, R.、Bateman, I.(2000)。Efficiency Gains Afforded by Improved Bid Design Versus Follow-Up Valuation Questions in Discrete-Choice CV Studies。Land Economics，76(2)，299-311。
35.	Whitehead, J. C.、Groothuis, P. A.、Blomquist, G. C.(1993)。Testing for Non-response and Sample Selection Bias in Contingent Valuation: Analysis of a combination phone/mail survey。Economics Letters，41(2)，215-220。
36.	Kanninen, B. J.(1995)。Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management，28(1)，114-125。
37.	McConnell, K. E.(1990)。Models for referendum data: the structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management，18，19-34。
38.	Randall, A.、Ives, B.、Eastman, C.(1974)。Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management，1(2)，132-149。
39.	Hanemann, W. M.、Loomis, J.、Kanninen, B.(1991)。Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation。American Journal of Agricultural Economics，73(4)，1255-1263。
40.	Jorgensen, B. S.、Syme, G. J.(2000)。Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement。Ecological Economics，33(2)，251-265。
41.	Bishop, Richard C.、Heberlein, Thomas A.(1979)。Measuring values of extra-market goods: Are indirect measures biased?。American Journal of Agricultural Economics，61(5)，926-930。
42.	Hsiao, C.、Sun, B.(1999)。Modeling survey response bias - with an analysis of the demand for an advanced electronic device。Journal of Econometrics，89，15-39。
43.	Cragg, John G.(1971)。Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods。Econometrica，39(5)，829-844。
44.	吳珮瑛、謝雯華(19950500)。環境財需求函數之估計：封閉式條件評估模型之比較分析。農業經濟叢刊，1(1)，1-46。延伸查詢
45.	Heckman, James Joseph(1979)。Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society，47(1)，153-162。
46.	Dubin, J. A.、McFadden, D. L.(1984)。An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holding and Consumption。Econometrica，52(2)，345-362。
47.	Edwards, S. F.、Anderson, G. D.(1987)。Overlooked biases in contingent valuation surveys: some considerations。Land Economics，63(2)，168-178。
48.	Li, C. Z.、Mattsson, L.(1995)。Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: An improved structural model for contingent valuation。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management，28(2)，256-269。
49.	Alvarez-Farizo, B.、Hanley, Nick、Wright, R. E.、Macmillan, D.(1999)。Estimating the Benefits of Agri-Environmental Policy: Econometric Issues in Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Studies。Journal of Environmental Planning and Management，42(1)，23-43。
50.	Drake, L.(1992)。The Non-marker Value of the Swedish Agricultural Landscape。European Review of Agricultural Economics，19(3)，351-361。
51.	Willis, K. G.、Powe, N. A.、Garrod, G. D.(2005)。Estimating the Value of Improved Street Lighting: A Factor Analytical Discrete Choice Approach。Urban Studies，42(12)，2289-2303。
52.	Halstead, John M.、Luloff, A. E.、Stevens, Thomas H.(1992)。Protest Bidders in Contingent Valuation。Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics，21(2)，160-169。
53.	Aristei, D.、Pieroni, L.(2008)。A Double-hurdle Approach to Modeling Tobacco Consumption in Italy。Applied Economics，40(19)，2463-2476。

研究報告
1.	洪志銘、蕭代基、林桓億、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、劉哲良、劉昱新(2012)。環境影響評估與開發計畫的社會效益成本評估之應用及檢討分析專案工作計畫。台北：中華經濟研究院。延伸查詢
2.	Arrow, Kenneth J.、Solow, Robert M.、Leamer, Edward E.、Portney, Paul R.、Radner, Roy、Schuman, Howard(19930115)。Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation。

學位論文
1.	黃一琳(2013)。距離與願付價值關係再檢視--受限分量迴歸模型之應用(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。延伸查詢
2.	Littman, M. L.(1996)。Algorithms for Sequential Decision Making(博士論文)。Brown University。

圖書
1.	Hammack, J.、Brown, G. M. Jr.(1974)。Waterfowl and Wetlands: Towards Bioeconomic Analysis。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins University Press。
2.	吳佩瑛、蘇明達(2001)。六十億元的由來--墾丁國家公園資源經濟價值評估。台北：前衛出版社。延伸查詢

其他
1.	行政院主計總處(2014)。台灣地區家庭收支調查，南投：行政院主計總處地方統計推展中心家庭收支科。，http://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/quick.asp， 2014/05/12。延伸查詢

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	森林遊樂區美景經濟價值評估研究--以惠蓀森林遊樂區為例
2.	臺灣水稻田生物多樣性之經濟價值評估
3.	綠色旅館之願付價格分析：以日月潭風景區為例
4.	國人對於保育臺灣黑熊之願付價值估計
5.	學校運動場館非使用價值經濟效益評估之研究--以大專校院運動場館為例
6.	臺灣不同世代家庭休閒消費支出分析--Double Hurdle模型之應用
7.	快樂的人越可能減肥嗎？--願意支付價值告訴你
8.	多財貨雙界二元選擇條件評估起始點偏誤檢定與校正模型之建構--改善三高危險因子對心血管疾病願付價值之評估
9.	臺灣家庭國外旅遊支出影響因素之研究--世代分析之應用
10.	應用Double Hurdle模型分析家庭休閒消費支出
11.	條件評估選擇式資料的理論詮釋與實證檢視--對臺灣戶外遊憩效益評估研究的一些啟示
12.	生態遊憩區價值之估計--假設市場評價法之應用
13.	臺灣水稻田之糧食安全及景觀價值
14.	受訪金額在開放選擇條件評估支付模式的作用--引導或是誤導
15.	抗議性樣本與答覆「無法確定」樣本之特質：這一群人對假設市場價值評估結果之影響

1.	我國稻米生產多功能性之測定

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	如何以最經濟的方式攝取營養素：以蔬菜、水果為例
2.	農業環境給付政策之研究--以有機稻米與水稻田為例
3.	Market Reaction to Firms' Carbon Footprint Disclosures: Evidence from Nine Countries in East Asian
4.	臺灣石斑魚產業運銷通路分析與市場需求預測
5.	考慮碳效益與輻射能量收支下森林最適輪伐期與林地期望值之實證分析
6.	桃園藻礁生態系經濟價值之評估
7.	投資人如何在收盤集合競價時間決定委託價、量積極度？探究資訊揭露對自然人與機構投資人之影響
8.	存款準備率對銀行利率決策與福利的影響
9.	通貨膨脹、政府交易決策與國際通貨
10.	Welfare Effects of Tariffication on Parallel Trade
11.	垂直產品差異與經濟整合的福利分析
12.	老人醫療利用的價格效果--以921震災的自然實驗為例
13.	資本結構、財政政策、貨幣政策與經濟成長
14.	Equilibrium Unemployment and Growth: The Role of Revenue Sharing and Bargaining Institutions
15.	糖尿病對臺灣中老年人就業的衝擊--體重控制的緩和效果

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫