In comparing Masuji Ibuse’s “Yohai Taicho” and Ying-Zhen Chen’s “The Country Village Teacher,” this essay analyses how the repatriated persons in Taiwan and Japan faced their crimes committed during war time, and explores varied issues hidden behind the questions of war responsibilities and the differences between post-war Taiwan and Japan. During WWII, as a war correspondent, Masuji Ibuse, in “Yohai Tacho,” by portraying Yuichi Okazaki, who suffered a mental anomaly due to a head injury during the war, still acting like an Imperial soldier after the war, mocks the Japanese people who recognised the value of peace immediately after the war was over. Yuichi was a comic character in the novel despite embodying the spirit of a loyal Imperial soldier; be that as it may, his madness represents the post-war Japan who has continuously denied her war responsibilities. Unlike Ibuse, Ying-Zhen Chen’s “The Country Village Teacher” describes the formation of the subjectivity and failures of Jing-Xiang Wu, a left-wing repatriated intellectual who committed cannibalism in South-east Asia. After Taiwan’s Restoration, in order to overcome his trauma, Wu tried to identify with his ideal homeland, but this attempt was completely shattered by the Cold War, and he eventually had to face the crimes committed on the battlefield. He finally committed suicide as an act of redemption. By analysing the behaviours and utterances of these two repatriated persons from different backgrounds portrayed in the two works, this essay first explores how the two writers from Japan and Taiwan narrate the psychology of repatriated persons, and then examines their post-war experiences and the problems of the formation of their underlying subjectivity. Finally, this thesis discusses the controversy of Japan’s war responsibilities from the perspectives of the abovementioned analyses, and reveals differences between post-war Taiwan and Japan.