:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:On Split Affectivity in Chinese
書刊名:清華學報
作者:蔡維天
作者(外文):Tsai, Dylan Wei-tien
出版日期:2017
卷期:47:2
頁次:頁407-432
主題關鍵詞:語法化理論製圖理論蒙受結構漢語句法方言語法Theory of grammaticalizationCartographic approachAffective constructionsChinese syntaxDialect grammar
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:11
本文從生成語法和製圖理論的角度來考察漢語方言中蒙受結構的分流現象:以「與」、「分」為代表的蒙受標記往往也有允讓、被動及與格等用法;以「共」、「同」為代表的蒙受標記則含括了受益、目的和處置等一系列從伴同關係發展出來的用法。我們認為前者跟 Hale & Keyser (2002) 所提出「終端遇合」的概念相契合,而後者則應歸類為「中央遇合」的衍生關係。本文的研究顯示這兩類蒙受用法雖然在北方官話中合流,在南方方言中卻是涇渭分明;這個現象可以用兩者既同源又分流的語法化路徑來解釋,其動因不單和前述「終端遇合」、「中央遇合」的對立有關,更植基於施用結構的層系句法特質及其詮釋機制。
This paper deals with a split of affectivity in Chinese dialects from the perspective of generative syntax: give-affectives sport permissive, passive and dative construals, whereas with-affectives garner comitative-oriented usages such as benefactive, goal, and disposal throughout the historical development. We propose to relate the former to the notion of “terminal coincidence”, and the latter to that of “central coincidence” in Hale & Keyser’s (2002) sense. Our study shows that, despite the apparent unified construals of gei ‘give’ in Mandarin, the main difference between the two types of affectives lies in their distinct routes of grammaticalization owing to the terminal-central dichotomy, as well as the interpretive mechanism of applicative syntax under the Cartographic Approach.
期刊論文
1.McGinnis, Martha(2001)。Variation in the phase structure of applicatives。Linguistic Variation Yearbook,1,105-146。  new window
2.Roberts, Ian、Roussou, Anna(1999)。A formal approach to grammaticalization。Linguistics,37,1011-1041。  new window
3.Chiang, Min-hua(2006)。Grammatical characteristics of tung and bun in Dongshi Hakka and the relatedness of the two markers。Language and Linguistics,7(2),339-364。  new window
4.Liu, Jian、Alain, Peyraube(1994)。History of some coordinative conjunctions in Chinese。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,22(2),179-201。  new window
5.Lee, Hui-chi(2012)。Applicatives in Taiwan Southern Min: benefactives and malefactives。Journal of East Asian Linguist,21(4),367-386。  new window
6.Chappell, Hilary、Peyraube, Alain、Wu, Yunji(2011)。A comitative source for object markers in Sinitic languages: 跟 kai55 in Waxiang and 共 kang7 in Southern Min。Journal of East Asian Linguistics,20(4),291-338。  new window
7.Roberts, Ian G.(1985)。Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries。Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,3(1),21-58。  new window
8.Yang, Barry Chung-Yu(2016)。Decomposing polysemy: A structural perspective from the ka-construction in Taiwan Southern Min。International Journal of Chinese Linguistics,3(1),132-159。  new window
9.Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan(2016)。論漢語內、外的輕動 詞的分布與詮釋。語言科學,13(5),225-241。  延伸查詢new window
10.王健(2004)。「給」字句表處置的來源。語文研究,2004(1),9-13。  延伸查詢new window
11.Harley, Heidi(2002)。Possession and the Double Object Construction。Linguistic Variation Yearbook,2,31-70。  new window
12.馮勝利、蔡維天、黃正德(2008)。傳統訓詁與形式語法的綜合解釋--以「共、與」為例談「給予」義的來源及發展。古漢語研究,80,58-69。  延伸查詢new window
13.Clark, Robin、Roberts, Ian(1993)。A Computational Model of Language Learnability and Language Change。Linguistic Inquiry,24,299-345。  new window
14.Chomsky, Noam(1999)。Derivation by Phase。MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics,18,1-52。  new window
15.Cheng, Lisa L.-S.、Huang, C.-T. James、Li, Y.-H. Audrey、Tang, C.-C. Jane(1999)。Hoo, Hoo, Hoo: Syntax of the Causative, Dative, and Passive Constructions in Taiwanese。Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series,14,146-203。  new window
16.黃正德(19991200)。Chinese Passives in Comparative Perspective。清華學報,29(4),423-509。new window  new window
17.Huang, C.-T. James(2006)。Resultatives and Unaccusatives: A Parametric View。Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan,253,1-43。  new window
會議論文
1.Catsimali, G.(1989)。Genikes pu Prosdiorizun ti Rimatiki Frasi/protasi。The 9th Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics。Thessaloniki:Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki。257-275。  new window
2.Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan(2012)。High Applicatives are not High Enough: A Cartographic Solution。The 14th China International Conference on Contemporary Linguistics,(會議日期: 11-13 May 2012)。Xi'an:Xi'an Foreign Language University。  new window
3.Michelioudakis, Dimitris、Sitaridou, Ioanna(2008)。The Ethic Dative in Modern Greek and Romance。The 29th Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics,(會議日期: 10-11 May 2008)。Thessaloniki:Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki。  new window
4.Lien, Chinfa(2002)。Grammatical Function Words 乞, 度, 共, 甲, 將 and 力 in Li4 Jing4 Ji4 荔鏡記 and Their Development in Southern Min。The Third International Conference on Sinology。Taipei:Institute of Linguistics, Preparatory Office, Academia Sinica。179-216。  new window
學位論文
1.Cuervo, Maria Cristina(2003)。Datives at Large(博士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology。  new window
2.Abney, Steven Paul(1987)。The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect(博士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology。  new window
3.Pylkkanen, Liina(2002)。Introducing arguments(博士論文)。Massachusetts Institute of Technology。  new window
圖書
1.Roberts, Ian(1993)。Verbs and Diachronic Syntax。Dordrecht:Kluwer。  new window
2.Lightfoot, David W.(1979)。Principles of Diachronic Syntax。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Hale, Kenneth、Keyser, Samuel Jay(2002)。Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure。MIT Press。  new window
4.Pesetsky, David(1995)。Zero syntax: Experiencers and Cascades。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
5.Jaeggli, Osvaldo(1982)。Topics in Romance Syntax。Dordrecht:Foris。  new window
6.Cinque, Guglielmo(1999)。Adverbs and Functional Heads。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Zúñiga, F.、Kittilä, S.(2010)。Benefactives and Malefactives: Typological Perspectives and Case Studies。Amsterdam:John Benjamins。  new window
8.吳福祥(2004)。敦煌變文十二種語法研究。鄭州:河南大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Perlmutter, David M.(1971)。Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax。New York:Holt, Reinhart and Winston。  new window
圖書論文
1.Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan(2015)。On the Topography of Chinese Modals。Beyond Functional Sequence。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Rizzi, Luigi(1997)。The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery。Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax。Dordrecht:Kluwer。  new window
3.Shibatani, Masayoshi(1976)。Causativization。Syntax and Semantics 5: Japanese Generative Grammar。New York:Academic Press。  new window
4.Chappell, Hilary(1999)。The Double Unaccusative in Sinitic Languages。External Possession。John Benjamins。  new window
5.吳福祥(2003)。漢語伴隨介詞語法化的類型學研究。語法化與語法研究。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
6.Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan(2013)。從生成語法看漢語蒙受結構的源起。語法化與語法研究。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.梅祖麟(2005)。閩南話 hɔı「給予」的本字及其語法功能的來源。永遠的430 POLA:王士元先生七秩壽慶論文集。臺北:中央研究院語言學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔣紹愚(2003)。「給」字句、「教」字句表被動的來源。語法化與語法研究。北京:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.Chomsky, Noam(2000)。Minimalist inquiries: the framework。Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik。MIT Press。  new window
10.Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan(2015)。A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinese adverbials, light verbs, applicatives and object fronting。The Cartography of Chinese Syntax。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top