:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣醫療糾紛適用仲裁制度之研究--以美國ADR經驗為中心
書刊名:東海大學法學研究
作者:張婷
作者(外文):Chang, Ting
出版日期:2017
卷期:51
頁次:頁217-269
主題關鍵詞:醫療糾紛仲裁裁判外紛爭解決模式調解-仲裁Medical malpracticeArbitrationAlternative dispute resolutionADRMed-Arb
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:5
本文以醫療糾紛領域為論述範圍,參考美國經驗,主張臺灣以ADR 作為其爭端解決途徑有其趨勢可循。除法院的調解等途徑外,本文建議在依循當事人自主原則前提下,可分階段推廣實施仲裁與Med-Arb 制度。此外,鑒於醫病之間對於醫療相關訊息與知識常呈現落差,無論何種ADR 途徑,須落實武器對等原則,方可在醫病之間產生信賴,進而實質地定紛止爭,化解衝突。
This article focuses on the medical malpractice area. After taking experiences from the US, there is a trend showing that ADR could be one of the conflict resolution paths in Taiwan. Beside mediation in the court, this article suggests that arbitration and Med-Arb could be applied step by step, following the party autonomy premium. Moreover, due to the gap of medical related information and knowledge between patients and physicians, no matter what ADR is applied; the principle of equal weapon should be fulfilled. Thus, among patients and physicians, trust could be built and conflicts could be substantially resolved.
期刊論文
1.Wu, Chun-Ying、Lai, Huei-Jen、Chen, Rong-Chi(2009)。Medical Malpractice Experience of Taiwan: 2005 versus 1991。Intern. Med. J.,39,237-242。  new window
2.朱柔若、林東龍(20031200)。醫療公道如何討?--臺灣醫療糾紛處理機制弊病之探索。醫事法學,11(3/4),31-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.許振東(20030300)。論醫療糾紛仲裁制度--兼評「醫療糾紛處理法」草案之「仲裁制度」。醫事法學,10(3)/11(1),33-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.張婷(20130600)。行政院版本醫療糾紛處理及醫療事故補償法(草案)之評析與建議。醫事法學,20(1),1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.邱慧洳(20150200)。論醫師醫療行為之注意義務--評最高法院100年度臺上字第2256號民事判決。法令月刊,66(2),58-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.古嘉諄(20010600)。介紹美國法院體系內之附屬仲裁機制--兼談引進國內之可行性。律師雜誌,261,3-8。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊秀儀(20140900)。臺灣醫療糾紛之迷思與真相--十五年回顧與展望。月旦民商法雜誌,45,56-73。  延伸查詢new window
8.林義龍(20140600)。論醫療糾紛處理之法制與實務--ADR臺中經驗。醫事法學,21(1),1-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳學德(20140700)。醫療糾紛處理與醫學倫理--臺中地院醫療試辦經驗分享。澄清醫護管理雜誌,10(3),4-6。  延伸查詢new window
10.張婷(20150600)。以仲裁解決醫療糾紛之適法性研究--借鏡美國之經驗。玄奘法律學報,23,139-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.McLean, David J.、Wilson, Sean-Patrick(2008)。Compelling Mediation In The Context Of Med-Arb Agreements。Disp. Resol. J.,63,28-33。  new window
12.Pappas, Brian A.(2015)。Med-Arb And The Legalization Of Alternative Dispute Resolution。Harv. Negot. L. Rev.,20(1),157-203。  new window
13.de Vera, Carlos(2004)。Arbitrating Harmony: "MED-ARB" and the Confluence of Culture and Rule of Law in the Resolution of International Commercial Disputes in China。The Columbia Journal of Asian Law,18,149-194。  new window
14.Baker, Tom、Lytton, Timothy D.(2010)。Allowing Patients to Waive the Right to Sue for Medical Malpractice: A Response to Thaler and Sunstein。Northwestern University Law Review,104(1),233-251。  new window
15.張婷(20151200)。由美國Med-Arb經驗論應用於臺灣醫療糾紛之可能性。嶺東財經法學,8,171-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Bowe, Guy(2014)。Skills & Values Alternative Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation, Collaborative Law and Arbitration。Y. B. On Arb. & Mediation,6,467-485。  new window
17.Carroll, Aaron E.、Parikh, Parul Divya、Buddenbaum, Jennifer L.(2012)。The Impact of Defense Expenses in Medical Malpractice Claims。J. Law Med. Ethics,40(1),135-142。  new window
18.Clinton, L. Kelly(2013)。Medical Malpractice Five Years After Going under the Knife, Med Mal Law is Still Feeling the Effects。Tenn. B. J.,49(11),12-17。  new window
19.Daniels, Stephen、Martin, Joanne(2010)。"It is no longer viable from a practical and business standpoint": Damage Caps, "Hidden Victims", and the Declining Interest in Medical Malpractice Cases。IJTLP,17(1),59-82。  new window
20.Ebe, Robert L.(2011)。A Different Approach To Conducting Med-Arb In Complex Commercial Litigation Matters。Alternatives to High Cost Litig,29,65-73。  new window
21.Ebe, Robert L.(2011)。Results And Observations: How A Multistep Med-Arb Produced A Fast(er) Settlement。Alternatives to High Cost Litig,29,83-85。  new window
22.Fullerton, Richard(2010)。Med-Arb And Its Variants: Ethical Issues For Parties And Neutrals。Disp. Resol. J.,65,52-61。  new window
23.Gilbert, Jon(2011)。Twelve Ways to Avoid A Determination of NICA Compensability in A Medical Malpractice Case。FLA Bar J.,85(10),42-45。  new window
24.Gu, Weixia(2014)。The Delicate Art Of Med-Arb And Its Future Institutionalisation In China。UCLA Pac. Basin L. J.,31,97-126。  new window
25.Hyman, Chris Stern、Liebman, Carol B.、Schechter, Clyde B.、Sage, William M.(2010)。Interest-Based Mediation of Medical Malpractice Lawsuits: A Route to Improved Patient Safety?。J. Health Polit. Policy Law,35(5),797-828。  new window
26.D'Alesio, Daniel J. Jr.(2014)。The Benefits and Risks of Using Presuit Voluntary Binding Arbitration as An Alternative Dispute Resolution Process in Medical Malpractice Cases。FLA Bar J.,88(10),20-27。  new window
27.Hoffoss, J. Lee Jr.(2014)。Alternative Dispute Resolution: The New Norm for Young Lawyers。La. B. J.,62,232。  new window
28.Lavi, Dafna(2014)。Divorce Involving Domestic Violence: Is Med-Arb Likely To Be The Solution?。Pepp. Disp. Resol. L. J.,14,91-151。  new window
29.Masland, John W.(2013)。Evaluating New Hampshire's First-in-the-Nation Early Offer Alternative to Medical Malpractice Litigation。Am. J. L. & Med.,39,648-670。  new window
30.Onyema, Emilia(2001)。The Use Of Med-Arb In International Commercial Dispute Resolution。Am. Rev. Int'l Arb.,12,411-423。  new window
31.Parris, Amber Murphy(2013)。Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Final Frontier of the Legal Profession?。J. Legal Prof.,37,295-307。  new window
32.Peter, James T.(1997)。Med-Arb In International Arbitration。Am. Rev. Int'l Arb.,8,83-116。  new window
33.Phillips, Gerald F.(2005)。It's More Than Just 'Med Arb': The Case For 'Transitional Arbitration'。Alternatives to High Cost Litig,23,141-154。  new window
34.Phillips, Gerald F.(2007)。A Case Study Demonstrates How The Entertainment Business-And Everyone Else-Can Benefit By Using Hybrid Med-Arb Processes。Alternatives to High Cost Litig,25,67-72。  new window
35.Phillips, Gerald F.(2008)。Back To Med-Arb: Survey Indicates Process Concerns Are Decreasing。Alternatives to High Cost Litig,26,73-79。  new window
36.Phillips, Gerald F.(2008)。The Survey Says: Practitioners Cautiously Move Toward Accepting Same-Neutral Med-Arb, But Party Sophistication Is Mandatory。Alternatives to High Cost Litig,26,101-104。  new window
37.Price, Ned I.(2012)。Binding Arbitration, Voluntary Trial Resolution, And Med-Arb Proceedings In Family Law。Fla. B. J.,86,48-52。  new window
38.Rosenfeld, S. James(2012)。It's Time for An Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure。J. Nat'l Ass'n Admin. L. Judiciary,32,544-567。  new window
39.Shurtz, Ity(2013)。The Impact of Medical Errors on Physician Behavior: Evidence from Malpractice Litigation。J. Health Econ.,32,331-340。  new window
40.Sloan, Frank A.、Chepke, Lindsey M.(2011)。Medical Malpractice。J. Leg. Med.,32,547-553。  new window
41.Vorys, Yolanda(2007)。The Best Of Both Worlds: The Use Of Med-Arb For Resolving Will Disputes。Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol.,22,871-897。  new window
會議論文
1.陳學德(2013)。加強調解解決醫療糾紛功能--從臺中地院試辦醫療調解制度談起。第一屆臺中醫法論壇,臺灣臺中地方法院、中國醫藥大學附設醫院、東海大學法律學院、臺灣本土法學雜誌有限公司、臺中市醫師公會、臺中市大臺中醫師公會、臺中市醫事法學會 (會議日期: 2013年9月1日)。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳學德(2015)。改善醫療調解(處)制度芻議--從當事人情緒支持與醫病文化出發。第三屆臺中醫法論壇,(會議日期: 104年10月18日)。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊秀儀、黃鈺媖(2015)。當法律遇見醫療:醫療糾紛立法論上的兩個主張。財團法人臺灣法學基金會勞動法及社會法研究中心醫療糾紛處理及醫療事故補償法(草案)政策研討會,(會議日期: 2015年10月31日),49-79。  延伸查詢new window
4.詹常輝(2015)。試論偵查程序中調解與鑑定之機制與成效--以醫糾案件為中心。第三屆臺中醫法論壇,(會議日期: 104年10月18日)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.衛生福利部醫事司。醫療糾紛鑑定案件、人民醫事爭議陳情處理等相關業務,全國各縣市97-102年醫療糾紛調處案件量統計。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林家祺、劉俊麟(2014)。民事訴訟法。書泉。  延伸查詢new window
2.施茂林(2015)。醫病關係與法律風險管理防範。五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡秀男(2014)。99%醫療糾紛都是可以避免的。貓頭鷹。  延伸查詢new window
4.財團法人臺灣醫療改革基金會。醫療爭議處理參考手冊。  延伸查詢new window
5.李伯璋、曾平杉(2010)。醫療紛爭在臨床醫學與法律實務的探討。新學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳光明(20040000)。仲裁法理論與判決研究。臺北:臺灣財產法暨經濟法研究協會。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李念祖、陳仕振、曲以文(2012)。我國仲裁與訴訟制度解決醫療糾紛之比較。訴訟外紛爭解決機制。三民。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE