:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:南投縣高齡友善旅宿業規劃決策之關鍵因素分析
書刊名:福祉科技與服務管理學刊
作者:周漢興 引用關係劉芬張東仁裴駿 引用關係
作者(外文):Chou, H.-H.Liu, F.Chang, T.-J.Pei, C.
出版日期:2017
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁83-95
主題關鍵詞:高齡友善城市心智圖修正式德菲法決策實驗室分析法分析層級程序法Age-friendly citiesMind mappingModified Delphi methodDEMATELAHP
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:5
南投縣政府於2013年根據世界衛生組織(WHO)於2007年提出的「高齡友善城市指標」,規劃高齡友善商店認證計畫。本研究探討南投縣旅宿業導入高齡友善商店認證計畫所需作為,經由量化分析後,提供未導入高齡友善認證之旅宿業參考。透過文獻探討,訂定初步關鍵因素,再運用修正式德菲法專家問卷,確認南投縣高齡友善旅宿業規劃之主要及次要關鍵因素以及繪製關鍵因素心智圖。接續運用決策實驗室分析法(DEMATEL)探討關鍵因素間之關聯度與影響度,並以分析層級程序法(AHP)計算次要關鍵因素之權重及排序。結果顯示,經文獻探討並由17位專家確認後,本研究共產生4項主要關鍵因素及18項次要關鍵因素。經DEMATEL分析獲得「安全環境」為最主要影響其他因素之關鍵因素;「服務品質」則是最易被其他因素所影響之關鍵因素。由AHP顯示在「服務品質」構面中,「優先並限時完成高齡者服務」最重要;「安全環境」構面中,「防滑設施」最重要;在「養生餐飲」構面中,「三少烹調方式」最重要;在「樂齡活動」構面中,「接駁及旅遊資訊」最重要。以上結果經由整理與歸納之後,以心智圖(mind map)呈現本研究之心智決策模式。
To alleviate the impacts of an aging society, developing age-friendly cities has become an urgent agenda for governments around the world. The World Health Organization proposed a number of features of age-friendly cities in Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide in 2007 that were based on eight aspects of aging societies. Based on these features, the Nantou County Government implemented a certification program for age-friendly tourism shops and hotels in 2013. This study investigated problems arising from the implementation of the certification program in Nantou County. By literature review and expert questionnaire of modified Delphi method, a set of key factors (major and minor factors) was constructed and verified. Subsequently, the relevance and significance of the major factors were analyzed using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method, and the weights of the minor factors were computed and sorted by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). After being extracted from a literature review and verified by 17 experts, four major factors and 18 minor factors were identified. The results of the DEMATEL analysis reveal that, "environment safety" is the pivotal major factor that influences all other major factors and "quality of service" is the major factor that is most susceptible to influence from other factors. The results of the AHP analysis indicate that in major factor "quality of service" facet, "providing prioritized and on-time service to the elderly" is the most critical factor; in "environment safety" facet, "nonslip facility" is the most critical factor; in "healthy diet" facet, "low fat, low sugar and low salt" diet is the most critical factor; and in "recreational activities for the elderly" facet, "transportation and tourist information" is the most critical factor. Based on these results, a mind mapping decision model of this study was completed and shown by a mind map.
期刊論文
1.Biggs, Simon(2001)。Toward critical narrativity: Stories of aging in contemporary social policy。Journal of Aging Studies,15(4),303-316。  new window
2.劉麗娟(20140300)。臺灣建立健康及高齡友善城市之歷程、評量系統與未來趨勢。城市學學刊,5(1),87-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Cheng, Y. T.、Chuang, H. M.、Pei, C.(2011)。Risk Management of Developing Assistive Devices for Elderly。Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics,52(3),e145-e151。  new window
4.Cheng, Y. T.、Chou, H. H.、Cheng, C. H.(2011)。Extracting key performance indicators (KPIs) new product development using mind map and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) methods。African Journal of Business Management,5(26),10734-10746。  new window
5.Lui, C. W.、Everingham, J. A.、Warburton, J.、Cuthill, M.、Bartlett, H.(2009)。What makes a community age-€friendly: A review of international literature。Australasian journal on ageing,28(3),116-121。  new window
6.陳偉杰、張瀞文、劉哲豪(2009)。立法院議事效率評估指標之建構:層級分析法之應用。大同大學通識教育年報,8,101-146。  延伸查詢new window
7.林振春(19920100)。德惠法(Delphi Techniluc)。民意月刊,169,82-101。  延伸查詢new window
8.胡志強、蔡炳坤、黃美娜、蔡淑鳳(20121200)。高齡友善城市之理念與實踐--臺中市經驗。護理雜誌,59(6),5-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Faherty, Vincent(1979)。Continuing Social Work Education: Results of a Delphi Survey。Journal of Education for Social Work,15(1),12-19。  new window
10.Murry, John W. Jr.、Hammons, James O.(1995)。Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research。The Review of Higher Education,18(4),423-436。  new window
11.Saaty, Thomas L.(1977)。A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures。Journal of Mathematical Psychology,15(3),234-281。  new window
12.Holden, Michael C.、Wedman, John F.(1993)。Future issues of computer-mediated communication: The results of a Delphi study。Educational Technology Research and Development,41(4),5-24。  new window
研究報告
1.國家發展委員會(2014)。中華民國人口推計(103年至150年)。臺北:國家發展委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.莊淑華(2012)。國小教師應用資訊科技融入教學之因素分析(碩士論文)。中華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡秀媛(2009)。運用KanoModel與DEMATEL於贏得訂單條件的改善:以臺灣工業電腦製造業個案為例(博士論文)。中華大學,新竹市。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳政全(2009)。以DEMATEL方法探討建廠專案工程的關鍵成功因素(碩士論文)。中華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.王雲東(2007)。社會研究方法。臺北:威仕曼文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.王順治、吳可久(2012)。WHO高齡友善城市指標可及性之研究高齡友善城市指標可及性之研究。臺北市:內政部建築研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.孫易新(2009)。孫易新心智圖法基礎應用孫易新心智圖法基礎應用。臺北市:浩域企管。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫易新(2013)。心智圖法心智圖法。臺北市:華騰文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估法及統計。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.World Health Organization(2007)。Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide。World Health Organization。  new window
其他
1.Word Health Organization(2013)。Network Cycle of Continual Improvement,http://www.who.int/ageing/age_friendly_cities_process/en/index.html, 2013/06/06。  new window
2.(2012)。公衛望遠鏡--高齡友善城市,http://www.farseeing.com.tw/2005/club/club_issue.php?class=3&datevalue=1349020800_1349020800。  new window
圖書論文
1.李佳欣、裴駿、鄭又腆(2014)。高齡職務再設計之心智決策模式分析。高齡職務再設計之心智決策模式分析103年度青少及中高齡者就業研究競賽論文集。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE