:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國高齡教育基本權的憲法基礎探究:終身學習權保障觀點
書刊名:教育科學研究期刊
作者:王等元
作者(外文):Wang, Deng-yuan
出版日期:2018
卷期:63:2
頁次:頁1-24
主題關鍵詞:在地老化高齡社會高齡教育教育基本權終身學習權Aging in placeAged societyBasic right to educationRight to lifelong learningSenior education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:320
  • 點閱點閱:13
個別基本權利功能及其憲法保障基礎的探究是基本權利理論研究的重要問題;故本研究從終身學習權保障觀點出發,並以教育憲法釋義學方法,試圖探究我國新興高齡教育基本權功能及其憲法保障基礎。本研究發現,為因應臺灣高齡社會發展趨勢,高齡教育基本權利應屬國民教育基本權與大學學術自由以外的新興教育基本權利,其憲法保障的基礎為我國立國精神之憲法基本原則、憲法第22 條「概括基本權利」,以及基本國策相關規定;其次,我國高齡教育基本權應具有防禦權功能、客觀價值秩序功能、制度性保障功能,以及組織與程序功能;最後,就其基本權功能而言,除防禦權功能外,其餘應屬基本權客觀法規範功能,旨在課予國家積極提供高齡學習機會之作為義務,以協助人民實現其高齡教育基本權利。
Discussions of individual basic rights and their constitutional protection are fundamental to research into basic rights theory. This paper aims at explicating the functions of the basic right to senior education and its constitutional rationale through interpretative epistemology of the Constitution from a lifelong-learning-right perspective. The research findings are as follows: (1) In global aging societies, the basic right to senior education is a relatively new right to education, and its constitutional rationale can be derived from articles 11 and 22 of the Constitution. (2) The functions of the basic right to senior education are the defensive function, objective values function, institutional protection function, and organizational and procedural function. (3) Except for the first function, the others are new basic-right functions, which impose the state obligations to help the older adults benefit from the right to senior education. On the basis of these findings, some suggestions for policy decision-makers and future research are provided.
期刊論文
1.劉麗娟(20140300)。臺灣建立健康及高齡友善城市之歷程、評量系統與未來趨勢。城市學學刊,5(1),87-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳明烈、陳雯萍、楊國德(20080200)。我國高齡教育的實施與發展。臺灣教育,649,2-10。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳明烈(20120100)。我國推動高齡學習的幾項重要思考。成人及終身教育,38,23-31。  延伸查詢new window
4.朱芬郁(20151200)。高齡學習者老化態度之研究--以中國、澳門、新加坡及臺灣為例。國立空中大學社會科學學報,22,1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李園會(19870700)。學習權。國教輔導,26(9),25-26。  延伸查詢new window
6.林麗惠、高玉靜(20160600)。高齡教育社會效果之調查。人文與社會科學簡訊,17(3),47-54。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳淑敏、林振春、謝婷婷(20100900)。高齡者背景變項與其學習偏好和學習權之調查研究--以臺北縣為例。社區發展季刊,131,397-422。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.黃月麗(20160300)。人口老化下的高齡教育政策。國土及公共治理,4(1),106-114。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊國德(20120100)。建構社區化高齡者終身學習平臺芻議。成人及終身教育,38,2-12。  延伸查詢new window
10.楊國賜(20141000)。終身學習的新思維與新方向。臺灣教育,689,2-7。  延伸查詢new window
11.Tam, M.、Boulton-Lewis, G.、Buys, L.、Chui, E.(2017)。Similarities and differences in views of ageing and learning in Hong Kong and Australia。Educational Gerontology,43(8),393-403。  new window
12.Ratsoy, G.(2016)。The roles of Canadian universities in heterogeneous third-age learning: A call for transformation。Canadian Journal of Higher Education,46(1),76-90。  new window
13.Ratana-Ubol, A.、Richards, C.(2016)。Third age learning: Adapting the idea to a Thailand context of lifelong learning。International Journal of Lifelong Education,35(1),86-101。  new window
14.楊國德(20080200)。保障高齡者的終身學習權。臺灣教育,649,11-17。  延伸查詢new window
15.許宗力(19960100)。基本權的功能與司法審查。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,6(1),24-34。  延伸查詢new window
16.張德永、陳柏霖(20130900)。高齡學習者學習行為觀察與評估。文官培訓季刊,2,5-13。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃富順(20050100)。高齡社會與高齡教育。成人及終身教育,5,2-12。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.法治斌、董保城(2014)。憲法新論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.周志宏(2003)。教育法與教育改革。高等教育出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.余書麟(1978)。國民教育權。新竹市:新竹師專。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。臺北市:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.許慶雄(1992)。憲法入門。臺北市:元照。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃富順(2004)。高齡學習。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Jacobs, H. L.、Mason, W. D.、Kauffman, E.(1970)。Education for aging: A review of recent literature。Washington, DC:Adult Education Association。  new window
8.Huber, R.、Gundar, M.、Sean, S.(1971)。Community college services for senior citizens。East Lansing, MI:Michigan State University。  new window
9.Cropley, A. J.(1980)。Towards a system of lifelong education: Some practical considerations。Hamburg:UNESCO Institute for Education。  new window
10.衛生福利部(2015)。高齡社會白皮書。臺北市:衛生福利部。  延伸查詢new window
11.Kauffman, E.(1967)。Continuing education for older adults: A demonstration in method and content。Lexington, KY:University of Kentucky。  new window
12.United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization(1996)。Learning, the treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century。Paris:United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization。  new window
13.教育部(1998)。邁向學習社會白皮書。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃富順(2008)。高齡教育學。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
15.許育典(20060000)。文化憲法與文化國。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.教育部(2006)。邁向高齡社會--老人教育政策白皮書。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
17.許育典(2007)。教育法。五南。  延伸查詢new window
18.吳庚(2003)。憲法的解釋與適用。三民。  延伸查詢new window
19.黃富順、楊國德(2011)。高齡學。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.黃月麗(2016)。活躍樂齡、深耕拓點--樂齡學習推動現況與展望,http://www.ey.gov.tw/File/8651CB08A02DF44B?A=C。  延伸查詢new window
2.United Nations(1991)。United Nations principles for older persons,http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/olderpersons.pdf。  new window
3.United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization(2003)。Nurturing the treasure: Vision and strategy 2002-2007,http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001311/131145e.pdf。  new window
4.United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization(1985)。Fourth international conference on adult education final report,http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/251_13.pdf。  new window
5.United Nations(2008)。Madrid plan of action and its implement,http://www.un.org/development/desa/ageing/madrid-plan-of-action-and-its-implementation.html。  new window
6.United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs(1999)。International year of older persons 1999,https://www.un.org/development/desa/ageing/resources/international-year-of-older-persons-1999.html。  new window
7.United Nations Volunteers(2018)。Who we are,http://www.unv.org/about-unv/who-we-are。  new window
8.World Health Organization(2007)。Global age-friendly cities: A guide,http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.李建良(1999)。基本權理論體系之構成及其思考層次。憲法理論與實踐。臺北市:學林。  延伸查詢new window
2.許育典(2006)。教育憲法的建構。部門憲法。臺北市:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇永欽(2006)。部門憲法--憲法釋義學的新路徑?。部門憲法。臺北市:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE