臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：即時司法救濟、正當程序與移民人身自由保障
書刊名：中研院法學期刊
作者：林超駿
作者(外文)：Lin, Chao-chun
出版日期：2018
卷期：23
頁次：頁1-79
主題關鍵詞：人身自由；正當程序；遣送程序；憲法第8條第1項；司法院釋字第708號解釋；Personal liberty；Due process；Removal process；Article 8 Paragraph I of ROC Constitution；J.Y. Interpretation No. 708
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 歷年統計：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:77
  • 點閱點閱:36
期刊論文
1.李建良(20111015)。人身自由的憲法保障與強制隔離的違憲審查--釋字第690號解釋。臺灣法學雜誌，186，60-79。  延伸查詢new window
2.林超駿、陳長文(20120200)。論待遣送外國人合憲收容要件--預防性拘禁觀點。政大法學評論，125，193-286。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林超駿(20120800)。非刑事預防性拘禁之法官（院）保留--兼評釋字第六九○號解釋。月旦法學，207，176-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Cole, David(2002)。In aid of removal: Due process limits on immigration detention。Emory Law Journal，51，1003-1040。  new window
5.廖元豪(20100900)。人身自由「非刑事程序」限制之檢討--以移民法制「收容」制度為例。全國律師，14(9)，50-66。  延伸查詢new window
6.Legomsky, Stephen H.(1999)。The Detention of Aliens: Theories, Rules and Discretion。University of Miami Inter-American Law Review，30，531-549。  new window
7.Legomsky, Stephen H.(2007)。The New Path of Immigration Law: Asymmetric Incorporation of Criminal Justice Norms。Washington and Lee Law Review，64，469-528。  new window
8.Legomsky, Stephen H.(2010)。Restructuring Immigration Adjudication。Duke Law Journal，59，1635-1721。  new window
9.Martin, David A.(2001)。Graduated Application of Constitutional Protections for Aliens: The Real Meaning of Zadvydas v Davis。Supreme Court Review，2001，47-137。  new window
10.Freeman, Jody、Rossi, Jim(2012)。Agency Coordination in Shared Regulatory Space。Harvard Law Review，125(5)，1131-1211。  new window
11.Katayal, Neal Kumar(2006)。Internal Separation of Powers: Checking Today's Most Dangerous Branch from within。Yale Law Journal，115，2314-2380。  new window
12.王寬弘、柯雨瑞(20000300)。「美國1996年移民及國籍法」收容、遣返及司法審查制度之介紹。警學叢刊，30(5)=129，75-120。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.許義寶(20131100)。論外國人收容之相關法律問題--兼論入出國及移民法第38條未來之修正。中央警察大學國土安全與國境管理學報，20，151-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.廖元豪(20150100)。「即時司法救濟」的具體化--行政訴訟法與提審法新修規定之評析。月旦法學教室，147，64-76。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳鏡華、陳育晏(20110400)。外國人收容之法律研究。中央警察大學法學論集，20，47-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.李建良(20030700)。外國人權利保障的理念與實務。臺灣本土法學雜誌，48，92-107。  延伸查詢new window
17.廖元豪(20140500)。「外人」的人身自由與正當程序--析論大法官釋字第七○八與七一○號解釋。月旦法學，228，244-262。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.陳英鈐(20130301)。[實例研習]被收容外國人之提審權。臺灣法學雜誌，219，155-160。  延伸查詢new window
19.廖元豪(20130800)。此亦人子也，可善遇之--釋字第七○八號解釋評釋。月旦裁判時報，22，5-17。  延伸查詢new window
20.李建良(20140715)。外國人收容之法官保留與司法救濟--2014年行政訴訟法修正評介。臺灣法學雜誌，252，1-10。  延伸查詢new window
21.林超駿(20120600)。論合憲訴訟救濟制度之建構--從釋字第665號解釋出發。臺北大學法學論叢，82，1-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.胡宜如(2014)。人權保障新篇章：談提審新制。司法新聲，112，9-23。  延伸查詢new window
23.翁燕菁(20160300)。國門前的難民--不遣返原則與難民法。月旦法學，250，158-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.高榮志(20100900)。淺析我國法院實務使用提審法之現況--以外國人收容為核心。全國律師，14(9)，67-74。  延伸查詢new window
25.許義寶(20140900)。論臺灣外國人收容之法制與其問題。臺灣國際法季刊，11(3)，27-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Baldaccini, Anneliese(2009)。The Return and Removal of Irregular Migrants under Eu Law: An Analysis of the Returns Directive。European Journal of Migration and Law，11，1-17。  new window
27.Barkow, Rachel E.(2010)。Insulating Agencies: Avoiding Capture Through Institutional Design。Texas Law Review，89(1)，15-79。  new window
28.Basilien-Gainche, Marie-Laure(2015)。Immigration Detention under the Return Directive: the CJEU Shadowed Lights。European Journal of Migration and Law，17，107-129。  new window
29.Cade, Jason A.(2015)。Enforcing Immigration Equity。Fordham Law Review，84，661-724。  new window
30.Chin, Gabriel J.(2011)。Illegal Entry as Crime, Deportation as Punishment: Immigration Status and the Criminal Process。UCLA Law Review，58，1417-1459。  new window
31.Cox, Adam B.、Rodriguez, Christina M.(2015)。The President and Immigration Law Redux。Yale Law Journal，125，104-225。  new window
32.Das, Alina(2011)。The Immigration Penalties of Criminal Convictions: Resurrecting Categorical Analysis in Immigration Law。New York University Law Review，86，1669-1760。  new window
33.Das, Alina(2013)。Immigration Detention: Information Gaps and Institutional Barriers to Reform。University of Chicago Law Review，80，137-164。  new window
34.Das, Alina(2018)。Administrative Constitutionalism in Immigration Law。Boston University Law Review，98，485-539。  new window
35.Duffy, Aoife(2008)。Expulsion to Face Torture? Non-refoulement in International Law。International Journal of Refugee Law，20(3)，373-390。  new window
36.Eagly, Ingrid V.、Shaffer, Steven(2015)。A National Study of Access to Counsel in Immigration Court。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，164，1-91。  new window
37.Family, Jill E.(2016)。The Executive Power of Process in Immigration Law。Chicago-Kent Law Review，91，59-89。  new window
38.Family, Jill E.(2017)。Immigration Law Allies and Administrative Law Adversaries。Georgetown Immigration Law Journal，32，99-127。  new window
39.Fan, Mary D.(2013)。The Case for Crimmigration Reform。North Carolina Law Review，92，75-148。  new window
40.Frankel, Elizabeth M.(2011)。Detention and Deportation with Inadequate Due Process: The Devastating Consequences of Juvenile Involvement with Law Enforcement for Immigrant Youth。Duke Forum for Law and Social Change，3，63-107。  new window
41.Hernández, César Cuauhtémoc García(2014)。Immigration Detention as Punishment。UCLA Law Review，61，1346-1414。  new window
42.Johnson, David T.(2012)。Japan's Prosecution System。Crime and Justice，41，35-74。  new window
43.Kanstroom, Daniel、Chicco, Jessica(2015)。The Forgotten Deported: A Declaration on the Rights of Expelled and Deported Persons。New York University Journal of International Law and Policy，47，537-592。  new window
44.Kidane, Won(2013)。Procedural Due Process in the Expulsion of Aliens under International, United States, and European Union Law: A Comparative Analysis。Emory International Law Review，27，285-346。  new window
45.Metzger, Gillian E.(2009)。The Interdependent Relationship Between Internal and External Separation of Powers。Emory Law Journal，59，423-457。  new window
46.Motomura, Hiroshi(1990)。Immigration Law after a Century of Plenary Power: Phantom Constitutional Norms and Statutory Interpretation。Yale Law Journal，100，545-613。  new window
47.Nou, Jeniffer(2015)。Intra-Agency Coordination。Harvard Law Review，129，421-490。  new window
48.Rosenbaum, Carrie(2018)。Immigration Law's Due Process Deficit and the Persistence of Plenary Power。Berkeley LA Raza Law Journal，28，119-156。  new window
49.Ryo, Emily(2016)。Detained: A Study of Immigration Bond Hearings。Law and Society Review，50，117-153。  new window
50.Sayed, Faiza W.(2011)。Challenging Detention: Why Immigrant Detainees Receive Less Process Than "Enemy Combatants" and Why They Deserve More。Columbia Law Review，111，1833-1877。  new window
51.Shah, Bijal(2015)。Uncovering Coordinated Interagency Adjudication。Harvard Law Review，128，805-905。  new window
52.Sharpless, Rebecca(2016)。"Immigrants Are Not Criminals": Respectability, Immigration Reform, and Hyperincarceration。Houston Law Review，53，691-765。  new window
53.Silva, Travis(2012)。Towards a Constitutional Theory of Immigration Detention。Yale Law & Policy Review，31，227-273。  new window
54.Stumpf, Juliet P.(2006)。The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power。American University Law Review，56，367-419。  new window
55.Stumpf, Juliet P.(2011)。Doing Time: Crimmigration Law and the Perils of Haste。UCLA Law Review，58，1705-1748。  new window
56.Torrey, Philip L.(2015)。Rethinking Immigration's Mandatory Detention Regime: Politics, Profit, and the Meaning of "Custody"。University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform，48，879-913。  new window
57.Wexler, Allison(2004)。The Murky Depths of the Entry Fiction Doctrine: The Plight of Inadmissible Aliens Post-Zadvydas。Cardozo Law Review，25，2029-2078。  new window
58.李震山(20030700)。論移民制度與外國人基本權利。臺灣本土法學雜誌，48，51-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林超駿(2010)。提審法、人身保護令狀與外國人驅逐出國程序之收容。第七屆「憲法解釋之理論與實務」學術研討會，中央研究院法律學研究所(主辦) 。臺北：中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。519-575。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wilsher, Daniel(2012)。Immigration Detention: Law, History, Politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.王兆鵬(2010)。刑事訴訟法講義。台北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hodgson, Jacqueline(2005)。French Criminal Justice: A Comparative Account of the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime in France。Oxford：Hart Publishing。  new window
4.European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice(2008)。European Judicial Systems: Edition 2008 (data 2006): Efficiency and Quality of Justice。Council of Europe Publishing。  new window
5.林鈺雄(2013)。刑事訴訟法。元照。  延伸查詢new window
6.Aleinikoff, Thomas Alexander、Martin, David A.、Motomura, Hiroshi(2008)。Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy。Eagan, MN：Thomson West。  new window
7.Chemerinsky, Erwin(2011)。Federal Jurisdiction。New York, NY：Aspen Publishers。  new window
8.Cornelisse, Galina(2010)。Immigration Detention and Human Rights: Rethinking Territorial Sovereignty。Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
9.Costello, Cathryn(2016)。The Human Rights of Migrants and Refugees in European Law。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Jehle, Jörg-Martin、Wade, Marianne(2006)。Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice System: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power Across Europe。Springer。  new window
11.Kanstroom, Daniel(2007)。Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History。Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Ligeti, Katalin(2013)。Toward a Prosecutor for the European Union Vol. 1: A Comparative Analysis。Oxford：Hart Publishing。  new window
13.Peers, Steve、Guild, Elspeth、Arcarazo, Diego Acosta、Groenendijk, Kees、Moreno-Lax, Violeta(2012)。EU Immigration and Asylum Law (Text and Commentary) Vol. 2: EU Immigration Law。Leiden：Martinus Nijhoff Publishers。  new window
14.Pfander, James E.(2009)。One Supreme Court: Supremacy, Inferiority, and the Judicial Department of the United States。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dervieux, Valérie(2002)。The French System。European Criminal Procedures。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Frase, Richard S.(2007)。France。Criminal Procedure: A Worldwide Study。Durham, NC：Carolina Academic Press。  new window
3.Mitsilegas, Valsamis(2016)。Immigration Detention, Risk and Human Rights in the Law of the European Union. Lessons from the Returns Directive。Immigration Detention, Risk and Human Rights。Basel：Springer International Publishing。  new window
4.Perrodet, Antoinette(2002)。The Italian System。European Criminal Procedures。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Schieffer, Martin(2010)。Termination of Residence: Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals。EU Immigration and Asylum Law: Commentary on EU Regulations and Directives。München：Verlag C. H. Beck oHG。  new window
6.Tricot, Juliette(2013)。France。Toward a Prosecutor for the European Union Vol. 1: A Comparative Analysis。Oxford：Hart Publishing。  new window
7.Weigend, Thomas(2013)。Germany。Toward a Prosecutor for the European Union Vol. 1: A Comparative Analysis。Oxford：Hart Publishing。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1722（臺灣：1659，外國：63） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2580849 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：83894597
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上