:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:試論監察院調查權之挑戰與變革
書刊名:月旦法學
作者:林超駿 引用關係
出版日期:2019
卷期:293
頁次:頁115-139
主題關鍵詞:監察院調查權制衡非問責性調查英國公共調查制度法官評鑑委員會
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.Ackerman, Bruce(2000)。The New Separation of Powers。Harvard Law Review,113(3),633-729。  new window
2.Alford, William P.(2000)。Exporting "the Pursuit of Happiness"。Harvard Law Review,113,1677-1715。  new window
3.Simon, Jonathan(2005)。Parrhesiastic Accountability: Investigatory Commissions and Executive Power in an Age of Terror。Yale Law Journal,114(6),1419-1457。  new window
4.林超駿(20150300)。從發動機制著手之非常救濟變革:英國刑案審查委員會之例。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,44(1),263-354。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.洪家殷、蘇永欽(19940700)。從監察院之地位,論監察權對司法權行使之界限--以彈劾權行使之原因為對象。憲政時代,20(1),20-40。  延伸查詢new window
6.林世宗、翟宗泉(19940700)。監察權、立法權與司法權之爭議--兼論監察委員對司法人員之調查權。憲政時代,20(1),40-54。  延伸查詢new window
7.Dash, Abraham(2001)。Symposium: "The Office of Independent Counsel and the Fatal Flaw: "They Are Left to Twist in the Wind。Maryland Law Review,60,26-40。  new window
8.蘇義雄(19910400)。「從監察院之調查權論司法權與監察權之界限」研討會。憲政時代,16(4),9-27。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳愛娥(20180900)。監察院行使調查權聲請釋憲要件說明會意見。月旦法學,280,133-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.李建良(20180900)。關於監察院聲請釋憲的若干方法論問題。月旦法學,280,122-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Flinders, Matthew(2001)。Mechanisms of judicial accountability in British central government。Parliamentary Affairs,54(1),54-71。  new window
12.Fenster, Mark(2008)。Designing Transparency: The 9/11 Commission and Institutional Form。WASH. & LEE. L. REV.,65。  new window
13.Burbank, Stephen B.、Plager, S. Jay(1993)。Foreword: The Law of Federal Judicial Discipline and the Lessons of Social Science。U PA. L. REV.,142。  new window
14.Redish, Martin H.(1999)。Judicial Discipline, Judicial Independence, and the Constitution: A Textual and Structural Analysis。S. CAL. L. REV.,72。  new window
15.Parakash, Saikrishna、Smith, Steven D.(2006)。How to Remove a Federal Judge。YALE L. J.,116。  new window
16.Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan(2010)。Reflection in the Shadow of Blame: When Do Politicians Appoint Commissions of Inquiry?。British Journal of Political Science,40(3),613-634。  new window
圖書
1.Leo, Richard A.(2008)。Police interrogation and American justice。Harvard University Press。  new window
2.法治斌、董保城(2014)。憲法新論。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳新民(2011)。憲法學釋論。  延伸查詢new window
4.林子儀、葉俊榮、黃昭元、張文貞(2016)。憲法:權力分立。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
5.李惠宗(2015)。憲法要義。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.林紀東(1989)。中華民國憲法釋論。  延伸查詢new window
7.Gee, Graham(2015)。The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK's Changing Constitution。  new window
8.Blom-Cooper, Louis(2017)。Public Inquiries: Wrong Route on Bloody Sunday。  new window
9.Slapper, Gary、Kelly, David(2012)。The English Legal System。  new window
10.Cownie, Fiona(2010)。English Legal System in Context。  new window
11.Bradley, A. W.、Ewing, K. D.(2011)。Constitutional and Administrative Law。  new window
12.Norris, Emma、Shepheard, Marcus(2017)。How public inquiries can lead to change。  new window
13.Stark, Alastair(2018)。Public Inquiries, Policy Learning, and the Threat of Future Crises。  new window
14.Beer, Jason(2011)。Public Inquiries。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳淳文(2007)。中央政府體制改革的謎思與展望。憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖福特(2007)。創設國家人權機構:理想、類型與憲改。憲法解釋之理論與實務。台北:中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
3.李念祖(2009)。試論監察權正當法律程序之若干基本問題--美國法制的對照與啟示。監察調查理論與實務策進之研究。台北:監察院。  延伸查詢new window
4.林超駿(2013)。偏師先濟?論監察院調查權--兼介英國公共調查制度。公法研究的世代對話:法治斌教授逝世十週年紀念論文集。  延伸查詢new window
5.Seibert-Fohr, Anja(2012)。Judicial Independence in Germany。Judicial Independence in Transition。  new window
6.Garapon, Antoine、Epineuse, Harold(2012)。Judicial Independence in France。JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN TRANSITION。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top