臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：試論刑案釋憲溯及效力：從憲訴到非常上訴
書刊名：國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者：林超駿
作者(外文)：Lin, Frederick Chao-chun
出版日期：2021
卷期：50:2
頁次：頁621-701
主題關鍵詞：釋憲效力；溯及既往；憲法訴訟法；非常上訴；刑事規範位階；Temporal effects of constitutional interpretation；Retroactivity；Post-conviction procedure；Reliefs for criminal final judgments；The hierarchy of criminal norms
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.吳信華(20130801)。二〇一三年「司法院大法官審理案件法修正草案」評析。臺灣法學雜誌，229，33-56。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fallon, Richard H. Jr.、Meltzer, Daniel J.(1991)。New Law, Non-Retroactivity, and Constitutional Remedies。Harvard Law Review，104(8)，1731-1833。  new window
3.王兆鵬(20090700)。重新思考非常上訴制度。月旦法學雜誌，170，98-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林鈺雄(20130501)。我國刑事非常救濟制度之漏洞與填補--兼評鄭性澤聲請再審案。臺灣法學雜誌，223，92-114。  延伸查詢new window
5.林超駿(20150300)。從發動機制著手之非常救濟變革：英國刑案審查委員會之例。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，44(1)，263-354。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳信華(20140400)。論大法官解釋的「效力」--基礎結構的釐清與體系化的觀察。東吳法律學報，25(4)，1-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Geek(1966)。Judicial Review of Statutes: A Comparative Survey of Present Institutions and Practices。Cornell Law Quarterly，51(2)，250-304。  new window
8.(1962)。Prospective Overruling and Retroactive Application in the Federal Courts。Yale Law Journal，71(5)，907-951。  new window
9.林超駿(20190614)。終審法院定位與金字塔型訴訟建構--回顧與前瞻。臺灣法學雜誌，369，85-110。  延伸查詢new window
10.Allen, S. W.(2009)。Toward a Unified Theory of Retroactivity。New York Law School Law Review，54(1)，105-144。  new window
11.Bender, P.(1962)。The Retroactive Effect of an Overruling Constitutional Decision: Mapp v. Ohio。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，110(5)，650-683。  new window
12.Berry, W. W. III(2016)。Normative Retroactivity。University Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law，19(2)，485-519。  new window
13.Bozzo, P.(2019)。What We Talk About When We Talk About Retroactivity。American Journal of Criminal Law，46(1)，13-75。  new window
14.Beytagh, F. X.(1975)。Ten Years of Non-Retroactivity: A Critique and a Proposal。Virginia Law Review，61(8)，1557-1625。  new window
15.Beswick, Samuel(2020)。Retroactive Adjudication。Yale Law Journal，130(2)，276-365。  new window
16.Freedman, E.(2021)。The Substance of Montgomery Retroactivity: The Definition of States' Supremacy Clause Obligation to Enforce Newly-Recognized Federal Rights in Their Post-Conviction Proceedings and Why It Matters。Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law，18(2)，101-144。  new window
17.Fox, D.、Stein, A.(2016)。Constitutional Retroactivity in Criminal Procedure。Washington Law Review，91(2)，463-514。  new window
18.(2016)。Eighth Amendment--Retroactivity of New Constitutional Rules--Juvenile Sentencing--Montgomery v. Louisiana。Harvard Law Review，130(1)，377-386。  new window
19.Hammer, S. J.(2018)。Retroactivity and Restraint: An Anglo-American Comparison。Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy，41(1)，409-442。  new window
20.Grünewald, R.(2014)。Comparing Injustices: Truth, Justice and the System。Albany Law Review，77(3)，1139-1200。  new window
21.Heytens, T. J.(2006)。Managing Transitional Moments in Criminal Cases。Yale Law Journal，115(5)，922-994。  new window
22.Hashimoto, E. J.(2013)。Reclaiming the Equitable Heritage of Habeas。Northwestern University Law Review，108(1)，139-186。  new window
23.Kay, R.(2014)。Retroactivity and Prospectivity of Judgments in American Law。The American Journal of Comparative Law，62(1)，37-67。  new window
24.Lasch, C. N.(2009)。The Future of Teague Retroactivity, or 'Redressability,' after Danforth v. Minnesota: Why Lower Courts Should Give Retroactive Effect to New Constitutional Rules of Criminal Procedure in Postconviction Proceedings。American Criminal Law Review，46(1)，1-72。  new window
25.Litman, L. M.(2018)。Legal Innocence and Federal Habeas。Virginia Law Review，104(3)，417-495。  new window
26.Meyer, L. M.(1994)。"Nothing We Say Matters": Teague and New Rules。University of Chicago Law Review，61(2)，423-492。  new window
27.Mishkin, P. J.(1965)。The Supreme Court, 1964 Term。Harvard Law Review，79(1)，56-211。  new window
28.Schwartz, H.(1966)。Retroactivity, Reliability, and Due Process: A Reply to Professor Mishkin。University Chicago Law Review，33(4)，719-768。  new window
29.Roosevelt, K. III(1999)。A Little Theory is a Dangerous Thing: The Myth of Adjudicative Retroactivity。Connecticut Law Review，31(3)，1075-1137。  new window
30.Treanor, W. M.、Sperling, G. B.(1993)。Prospective Overruling and the Revival of "Unconstitutional" Statute。Columbia Law Review，93(8)，1902-1955。  new window
31.Vázquez, C. M.、Viadeck, S. I.(2017)。The Constitutional Right to Collateral Post-Conviction Review。Virginia Law Review，103(5)，905-962。  new window
32.Verstraelen, S.(2013)。The Temporal Limitation of Judicial Decisions: The Need for Flexibility Versus the Quest for Uniformity。German Law Journal，14(9)，1687-1730。  new window
33.Yackle, L. W.(1996)。Federal Evidentiary Hearings Under the New Habeas Corpus Statute。Boston University Public Interest Law Journal，6(1)，135-151。  new window
34.Zarrow, J. M.、Milliken, W. H.(2015)。The Retroactivity of Substantive Rules to Cases on Collateral Review and the AEDPA, with a Special Focus on Miller v. Alabama。Indiana Law Review，48(3)，931-994。  new window
35.楊雲驊(20130801)。非常上訴的目的與功能--以最高法院97年度第四次刑事庭決議為中心。臺灣法學雜誌，229，118-157。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cappelletti, Mauro(1971)。Judicial Review in the Contemporary World。Bobbs-Merrill Press。  new window
2.Emmerson, Ben、Ashworth, A.、Macdonald, A.(2012)。Human rights and criminal justice。Sweet & Mxwell Press。  new window
3.Taylor, P.(2012)。Taylor on Criminal Appeals。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
4.林永謀(2007)。刑事訴訟法釋論。臺北：林永謀。  延伸查詢new window
5.林子儀、葉俊榮、黃昭元、張文貞(2016)。憲法：權力分立。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bohlander, Michael(2012)。Principles of German Criminal Procedure。Hart Publishing。  new window
7.Brewer-Carías, Allan R.(2011)。Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Chemerinsky, E.(2012)。Federal Jurisdiction。Wolters Kluwer。  new window
9.De Visser, M.(2014)。Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis。Hart Publishing。  new window
10.Garrett, B. L.、Lee, K.(2013)。Federal Habeas Corpus: Executive Detention and Post-Conviction Litigation。West Academic Publishing。  new window
11.Gamer, Bryan A.、Bea, C.、Berch, R. W.、Gorsuch, N. M.、Hartz, H. L.、Hecht, N. L.、Kavanaugh, B. M.、Kozinski, A.、Lynch, S. L.、Piyor, W. H. Jr.、Reavley, T. M.、Sutton, J. S.、Wood, D. P.(2016)。The Law of Judicial Precedent。Thomson West。  new window
12.Juratowitch, B.(2008)。Retroactivity and the Common Law。Hart Publishing。  new window
13.Hertz, Randy、Liebman, James S.(2011)。Federal Habeas Corpus Practice and Procedure。Matthew Bender & Company。  new window
14.Hufen, F.(2008)。The Restriction of the Effects of Judgments in Cases of Ascertainment of Their Unconstitutionality。Bundesministerium der Finanzen。  new window
15.Powe, L. A. Jr.(2001)。The Warren Court and American Politics。Harvard University Press。  new window
16.von Staden, A.(2018)。Strategies of Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights: Rational Choice Within Normative Constraints。Penn Press。  new window
17.林俊益(2018)。刑事訴訟法概論。新學林。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.李姿燕(20170710)。大法官解釋效力與聲請人原因案件之救濟，https://www.laf.org.tw/index.php?action=LAFBaoBao-detail&tag=265&id=92。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.吳俊毅(2016)。德國因新事實或新證據的再審：兼論鑑定人與再審的關係。刑事再審與救濟無辜。元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.Boyron, S.(2011)。France。How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study。Hart Publishing。  new window
3.Drinoczi, T.(2014)。Temporal Effects of Decisions of the Hungarian Constitutional Court。The Effects of Judicial Decisions in Time。Intersentia。  new window
4.Juratowitch, B.(2014)。The Temporal Effect of Judgments in the United Kingdom。The Effects of Judicial Decisions in Time。Intersentia。  new window
5.Kühn, Z.(2015)。Towards a Sophisticated Theory of Precedent? Prospective and Retrospective Overruling in Czech Legal System。Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions。Springer。  new window
6.Lachmayer, K.(2011)。Austria。Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Martincio, G.(2014)。Temporal Effects of the Italian Constitutional Court and the Mechanism of Warning Decisions。The Effects of Judicial Decisions in Time。Intersentia。  new window
8.Miller, F. X.(2014)。Temporal Effects of Judicial Decisions in France。The Effects of Judicial Decisions in Time。Intersentia。  new window
9.Popelier, P.、Vestraelen. S.、Vanheule, D.、Vanlerberghe, B.(2014)。The Effect of Judicial Decisions in Time: Comparative Notes。The Effects of Judicial Decisions in Time。Intersentia。  new window
10.Stelzer, M.(2014)。Pro Futuro and Retroactive Effects of Rescissory Judgments in Austria。The Effects of Judicial Decisions in Time。Intersentia。  new window
11.Steiner, E.(2015)。Judicial Rulings with Prospective Effect-from Comparison to Systematisation。Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions。Springer。  new window
12.Verstraelen, S.(2014)。The Interplay of Temporal Effects of Judicial Decisions within the Belgian Legal Order。The Effects of Judicial Decisions in Time。Intersentia。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：627（臺灣：627，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67524801
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上