資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.145.171.81)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
影響教育行政決定之因素研究
書刊名:
師大學報
作者:
吳清基
出版日期:
1984
卷期:
29
頁次:
頁93-173
主題關鍵詞:
決定
;
決策
;
問卷
;
教育行政
;
調查
;
機關
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(
1
) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
1
點閱:45
Decision-making in Educational Administration is the central function of the operation of educational administration, the main job of the educational administrators, and the focus of the academic study and the problem research of the educational administration today. It is essential for us to research into the factors that affect decision-making in educational administration in order to get a rational and effective operation of educational administrative decision-making. The major purposes of this research are, first, theoretical analysis about the factors that affect decision-making in educational administration; second, to find the real differences of the operation of the decision-making in educational admin-istration in R. 0. C.; third, to make some suggestions for improving the operation in decision-making in educational administration. The methods of this research are theoretical analysis and survey approach. The procedures are, first, to study the reference literature in order to construct the theoretical framework of this investigation; second, to finish the questionaire and to get 398 educational admiristrators as samples for surveying; third, to analyze and discuss the questionaire survey data; and fourth, to write research reports. The factors that affect decision-making in educational administration can be divided into two dimensions: one is individual factor, and the other, organizational. The former includes the following four factors: individual value and concept; individual knowledge and ability; individual intuition and habit; individual per-sonality and traits. The latter contains four factors too: organizational information and communication system; organizational internal human interrelationship; organizational external pressure and impact; organizational traditional habit and exercises. Some findings from the resource analysis for those factors are as follows: First, there is no significant difference between different sexes and job grades of educational administrators on the influence of both individual and organizational factors. Second, there are some significant differences between ages, institution and service years among the educational administrators. However, they are under the influence of individual factors, not the organizational factors. Third, there are some significant differences between different educational backgrounds arvd jobs among the educational administrators; however, they are under the influence of indivudual value and concept factor, not the others. Based on the findings, we can make some suggestions for improving the operation of the decision-making in educational administration. Firstly, to estab-lish the correct value and concept of educational administration. Secondly, to encourage the educational administrators to participate in the in-service training activities. Thirdly, to improve the qualities of the educational administrators in the local educational bureau. Fourthly, to stress the functions of the non-director educational administrators. Fifthly, to emphasize the training of educational administration professional aptitude. Finally, to improve the rational operation of educational administration.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Drucker, Peter F.(1968)。Decision-Making and the Effective Executive。NASSP Bulletin,52(328),24-39。
2.
彭文賢(19720100)。決策行為之探討。憲政評論,3(1),11-16。
延伸查詢
3.
黃昆輝(19750600)。教育行政決定理論之分析。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,17,123-152。
延伸查詢
4.
吳清基(19830600)。賽蒙行政決定理論及其對教育行政之啟示。師大學報,28,263-310。
延伸查詢
5.
華力進(19690600)。賽蒙氏決策理論。東方雜誌,2(12),48-55。
延伸查詢
6.
Churchman, C. W.(1956)。Science and Decision-making。Philosophy of Science,23。
7.
Singleton, J. W.(1972)。Decision-making。Education Canada,12(3),45-50。
8.
Faily, Anwar(1980)。Effective Administrative Behavior。NASSP Bulletin,64(433)。
學位論文
1.
張昭雄(1970)。行政決定之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Ofstad, Harold(1961)。An Inquiry into the Freedom of Decision。Oslo:Norwegian University Press。
2.
Simon, Herbert A.(1976)。Administrative Behavior。New York:Free Press。
3.
Snyder, Richard C.(1962)。Foreign Policy Decision Making: An Approach to the Study of International Politics。New York:Free Press。
4.
朱承武(1977)。現代管理科學。台北:台灣學生書局。
延伸查詢
5.
Sergiovanni, Thomas J.、Carver, Fred D.(1980)。The new school executive: A theory of administration。New York:Harper & Row。
6.
Griffiths, Daniel E.(1959)。Administrative theory: Current problems in education。New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts。
7.
Simon, Herbert A.(1960)。The New Science of Management Decision。New York, NY:Harper & Row。
8.
黃昆輝(1980)。教育行政與教育問題。臺北:五南。
延伸查詢
9.
Bross, Irwin(1953)。Design for decision。New York:MacMillan。
10.
Rick, John M.(1974)。New directions in educational policy。Professional Educators Publication。
11.
Summer, Charles E. Jr.(1956)。Factors in effective administration。New York:The Trustees of Columbia University。
12.
陳光華(1981)。企業政策。臺北:三民書局。
延伸查詢
13.
朱志宏(1979)。公共政策概論。台北市:三民書局。
延伸查詢
14.
Owens, Robert G.(1981)。Organizational Behavior in Education。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, Inc.。
15.
Lipham, James M.、Hoeh, James A. Jr.(1974)。The Principalship: Foundations and Functions。New York:Harper & Row Publishers Inc.。
16.
Mann, Dale(1975)。Policy decision-making in education。New York:Teachers College Press。
17.
Elbing, Alvar(1978)。Behavioral decisions in organizations。Glenview, Illinois:Scott Foresman and Company。
18.
Van Dusseldorp, Ralph A.、Richardson, Duane E.、Foley, Walter J.(1971)。Educational Decision-Making Through Operations Research。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。
19.
Alexis, Marcus、Wilson, Charles Z.(1967)。Organizational Decision Making。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。
20.
Lane, Willard R.(1965)。Foundations of Educational Administration。New York:The Macmillan Co.。
21.
Sayles, Leonard R.(1964)。Managerial Behavior: Administration in Complex Orgnizations。N.Y.:McGraw-Hill。
22.
Oxenfeldt, Alfred R.(1979)。Cost-Benefit Analysis for Executive Decision Making。New York:AMACOM。
23.
彭文賢(1981)。賽蒙氏的思想體系與組織原理。中央研究院三民主義研究所。
延伸查詢
24.
Richards, Max D.、Greenlaw, Paul S.(1972)。Management Decisions and Behavior。Homewood, Illinois:Richard D. Irwin, Inc.。
25.
Flippo, Edwin B.(1966)。Management: a behavioral approach。Boston, Mass:Allyn & Bacon。
26.
Jones, J. Morgan、黃榮亮(1979)。決策理論導引。台北:徐氏基金會。
延伸查詢
27.
PDK National Study committee on Evaluation(1971)。Educational Evaluation & Decision Making。Illinois:F. E. Peacock publishers。
28.
Braybrooke, David、Lindblom, Charles E.(1963)。A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process。New York:Free Press of Glencoe。
圖書論文
1.
Taylor, Donald W.(1965)。Decision-making and problem solving。Handbook of Organization。Rand McNally。
2.
Dill, William R.(1962)。Administrative Decision-making。Concepts and Tssues in Administrative Behavior。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall Inc.。
3.
Marschak, Jacob(1968)。Decision-making: Economical Aspects。International Encyclopedia of the Social Science。
4.
Robinson, James A.(1968)。Decision making: political Aspects。International Encyclopedia of the Social Science。
5.
魏鏞(1978)。政策科學與政策。政策科學與研考工作理論方法與實務論文集。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
延伸查詢
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
Primary Study of Design Approach of Attractiveness Survey Applying Structural Methods
2.
融資順位理論之調查研究
3.
諮商工作焦慮量表編製報告
4.
大學生自我分化程度與生涯成熟度關係之探討
5.
臺灣海外基金投資人投資決策因素之調查研究
6.
國小學童休閒閱讀現況之研究
7.
國小教師生態保育研習營個案研究
8.
國小音樂班視唱聽寫教學研究
9.
國中聽覺障礙學生的次級文化調查分析
10.
電視兒童節目廣告內容分析及其對國小兒童之影響
11.
電視暴力對國小兒童社會態度影嚮之研究
12.
大學生的學習參與、學習型態與學習成果的關係
13.
國小學生環境知識與態度之研究
14.
臺灣地區國民小學啟聰教育實施狀況調查研究
15.
都市地區肇事鑑定與分析之微電腦作業系統
1.
教育行政最適決策模式之研究
1.
學校經營管理與領導
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code