:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政黨比例代表制下選舉經費之均衡分析
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:宋玉生 引用關係孫智麗
出版日期:1993
卷期:21:2
頁次:頁161-178
主題關鍵詞:比例代表制均衡政黨經費選舉
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
     由於 「政黨比例代表制」在台灣未來的民意代表選舉中將占有更重要 的地位,故本文的目的乃在於分析該制度下敵對政黨的均衡競選支出狀況。本文 利用一空間選舉模型,假設政黨競爭的目的在於極大化其參選之預期政治利益。 由本文之模型我們可得競選兩黨的支出均衡解,並進而對兩黨之政治立場做比較 靜態分析。最後我們討論若兩黨之一面對經費不足之財務限制的情形,以及提出 政策涵意與建議。
     As the proportional representation (PR) feature becomes more prominentin the Taiwanese congress electoral system, the purpose of this paper is toanalyze the equilibrium campaign expenditures incurred by competingpolitical parties under this design. In this paper we employ a spatial election model and assume that all participating parties aim at maximizingtheir expected political benefits net of campaign costs. We first solve theunique equilibrium solution of this model, and then carry out comparativestatic analysis. We also study the situations when one of the competingparties faces a binding limited budget to finance its campaign activities.We conclude this paper with policy implications.
期刊論文
1.Glantz, Stanton A.、Burkart, Michael、Abramowitz, Alan I.(1976)。Election Outcomes: Whose Money Matters?。Journal of Politics,38,1033-1038。  new window
2.古慧雯、宋玉生(19930300)。你競選,大家都出錢?--臺灣選罷法競選經費補貼條款之經濟分析。經濟論文叢刊,21(1),25-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Chapman, R. G.、Palda, K. S.(1984)。Assessing the Influence of Campaign Expenditures on Voting Behavior within a Comprehensive Electoral Market Model。Marketing Science,3,207-226。  new window
4.Garvey, G.(1966)。The Theory of Party Equilibrium。American Political Science Review,60,29-38。  new window
5.Hinich, M. J.、Ledyard, J. O.、Ordeshook, P. C.(1972)。Nonvoting and the Existence of Equilibrium under Majority Rule。Journal of Economic Theory,4,144-153。  new window
6.Jacobson, G. C.(1978)。The Effect of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections。American Political Science Review,72,469-491。  new window
7.Jacobson, G. C.(1985)。Money and Votes Reconsidered: Congressional Elections, 1972-82。Public Choice,47(1),7-62。  new window
8.Johnston, R. J.(1978)。Campaign Spending and Votes: A Reconsideration。Public Choice,33(3),83-92。  new window
9.Kau, J. B.、Keenan, D.、Rubin, P. H.(1982)。A General Equilibrium Model of Congressional Voting。Quarterly Journal of Economics,97,271-293。  new window
10.Palda, K. S.(1975)。The Effect of Expenditure on Political Success。Journal of Law and Economics,18,745-771。  new window
11.Palda, K. F.、Palda, K. S.(1985)。Ceilings on Campaign Spending: Hypothesis and Partial Test with Canadian Data。Public Choice,45(3),313-331。  new window
12.Welch, W. P.(1974)。The Economics of Campaign Funds。Public Choice,20,83-97。  new window
13.Welch, W. P.(1976)。The Effectiveness of Expenditures in State Legislative Races。American Politics Quarterly,4,333-356。  new window
14.Welch, W. P.(1981)。Money and Votes: A Simultaneous Equation Model。Public Choice,36(2),209-234。  new window
15.Hotelling, Harold(1929)。Stability in Competition。The Economic Journal,39(153),41-57。  new window
圖書
1.楊泰順(1991)。選舉。台北:永然。  延伸查詢new window
2.Grofman, Bernard、Lijphart, Arend(1986)。Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences。New York:Agathon Press, Inc.。  new window
3.Enelow, James M.、Hinich, Melvin J.(1984)。The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Enelow, J. M.(1990)。Advances in The Spatial Theory of Voting。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
6.Mueller, Dennis C.(1989)。Public Choice II: A Revised Edition of Public Choice。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE