[內容提要]：《漠書•藝文志》著錄宋玉有賦十六篇；此十六篇賦作為何？與今傳者有何關係？皆值得探究。《隋書•經籍志》有「宋玉集三卷」，為宋玉有集之始見。此宋玉集有何內容？與十六篇有何關係？亦值得探討。 自西漠開始，宋玉賦作即不斷流傳開來，或暗用，或明錄；降至東漠之季，十六篇作品可以考知者，有〈九辯〉、〈登徒子好色賦〉及〈高唐賦〉，〈舞賦〉亦可能在其中。至於其他賦作，篇名雖無法考知，然亦為士林所傳誦，自是可以抖知。魏晉南北朝之際，仿擬風氣流行；從當時文人仿擬作品中，可知十六篇宋賦中尚有〈風賦〉、〈諷賦〉、〈神女〉及〈大言〉等篇。降至隋、唐，所可考知者又視前季為多矣。 《隋志》有「宋玉集三卷」；蓋隋之前，十六篇宋賦又改為三卷之宋集矣。改編後之宋集，其內容若何？亦頗值得深思。本文即根據古注、類書及相關古籍，略考其梗概。作者又根據其流傳之情形，封宋集之殘亡，略作推測。

　　　　　Song Yu's works first appeared in Han Shu (漢書) was sixteen pieces whereas in Sui Sbu (隋書) three volumes. The differences between them and their connections with the prevalent Song's works are deserved to be studied. It is no doubt that the scholars in Western Hah had read some of the Song's works;but it is not until the period of Eastern Han that Song's works entitled Jiu-bian (九辨) , Deng-tu-zi Hao-se mu ( 登徒子好色賦) and Gao-tang Fu (高唐賦) be mentioned in some other literary writings. There were writings entitled Feng (風) , Feng (諷), Shen-nu (神女) and Da-yan (大言) in the Six Dynasties period which might be imitative of Song's works;thus it is certainly true that the amount of Song's works known by the Six Dynasties' scholars were more than that in the Han Dynasties. So did the periods of Siu and T'ang. The content of Song's works after the re-compilation in the form of three volumes at the period of Siu Dynasty might have a little changes with the original Song's works; the Gu-zhu (古注) and Lei-shu (類書) did produced several evidences in supporting these changes. It is not until the beginning of the Song Dynasty that this three-volumes of Song's works disappeared in the literary world.