:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「在家自行教育」學生之家長對其身心障礙子女教育安置之意見調查研究
書刊名:特殊教育研究學刊
作者:吳武典 引用關係蔣興傑
出版日期:1995
卷期:12
頁次:頁51-73
主題關鍵詞:在家自行教育學生家長身心障礙子女教育安置
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:22
     本研究旨在探討「在家自行教育」之學生家長贊其障礙子女目前之教育安置意見。以各縣市八十二學年度「在家自行教育」學生家長為對象,自編「在家自行教育狀況及意見調查表」(家長用) 為研究工具,並自各縣市現有人數做1/2之抽樣調查,經得學生家長有效樣本967人 (有效達成率89%)。本研究之主要發現如下:(1)「在家自行教育」制度:認知有此制度者人數隨其教育程度之提高而遞增,有三成之學生沒有教師輔導,近九成之家長能接受「巡迴輔導」制,七成的家長肯定「在家教育」的功能(2)「教育代金」:認知有此制度者人數亦隨其教育程度之提高而遞增,未領取之學生中多為超齡學生,申請之管道多透過「學校單位轉知」,金額認為「適當」及「太少」之人數約各佔一半;(3)障礙子女未入學之主要原因為「障礙程度過於嚴重」及學校條件之無法配合,曾經嘗試進入教養機構之學生並不多(13.8%);(4)安置需求及建議:對於「巡迴輔導」之意見,家長有近六成希望輔導在平常日,七成表示在上午或下午並在三次以內較為恰當,相關之服務需求依次為「醫療復健」 、「安排養護」、「個別學習指導」,其他意見則主要為「加強家長之心理輔導」。根據研究結果,研究者從制度、代金、教育安置等三方面提出可行之改進建議。
     The purpose of this study was to explore the parents' attitudes toward and opinions on the "Home-Bound Instruction (HBI)" program. The target population was parents of disabled children participating in the HBI program in Taiwan area. One half of the target population (N=1,089) was randomly selected as the sample to answer a questionnaire in relating to their children's needs of educational placement and their comments on the HBI program in general. As a result, 967 subjects (or 89%) of the target sample were available. The major findings were as follows: 1.Most parents were aware of and positively recognized the HBI and its itinerary teacher programs. The awareness was increased as the parents' educational level increased. However, there were still about a quarter of subjects who were unsatisfied with the program, because the itinerary teacher didn't show up at all. 2.Most parents were aware of the "Education Subsidies" (NT$ 3,500 or NT$5,500 monthly) through school system; again, the awareness was increased as the parents's educational level in-creased; it was criticized that those who were over school age (i.e., over 15) were nor illegible for applying for the subsidies even they were still in the HBI program; one half of the subjects wished it increased. 3.The major reasons that their children failed to attend school were: their disabilities were too severe and the school settings were not accommodated; they were so severe that only few parents had attempted to look for institutional care. 4.It was hoped that itinerant services be provided on weekdays either in the morning or in the afternoon, at least once a week. 5.The most needed services of the children with severe disabilities and who failed to attend school were: medical rehabilitation, arrangement of institutional care, individual instruction, and parent counseling. Based on the findings of this study, suggestions of improving educational placement and providing better services for children with severe/multiple disabilities were discussed.
期刊論文
1.吳武典(19940600)。我國身心障礙兒童教育安置之檢討。師大學報,39,134-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔣興傑(19941200)。身心障礙學生接受「在家自行教育」之現況與檢討。特殊教育研究學刊,11,63-87。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.加藤忠雄(1990)。訪問教育の實態の課題--全國訪問教育研究會「訪問教育の實態の課題」紹介の問題の檢討。障害者問題研究,63,84-90。  延伸查詢new window
4.Reynolds, M. C.(1962)。A framework for considering some issues in special education。Exceptional Children,28(7),367-370。  new window
5.Deno, Evelyn N.(1970)。Special Education as Developmental Capital。Exceptional Children,37(3),229-237。  new window
6.吳武典(19920600)。Critical Issues in Educational Placement for Children with Mental Retardation。特殊教育研究學刊,8,69-81。new window  new window
會議論文
1.Mittler, P.(1987)。Toward integrated education。The 8th Asian Conference on Mental Retardation,(會議日期: Nov. 14-19, 1987)。  new window
研究報告
1.立法院(1987)。審查「特殊教育法施行細則」第一次聯席會議記錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳武典(1994)。國民教育階段「在家自行教育」制度及其相關問題之探討。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育部(1986)。教育部函,臺(76)國字第41369號。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳榮華、許澤銘、施金池(1993)。中日學齡特殊兒童鑑定就學及輔導制度之比較研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林寶山(1993)。特殊教育導論。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.李建興、林寶貴(1991)。我國各縣市特殊教育學生鑑定及就學輔導委員會工作執行成效訪視報告。教育部教育研究委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.何華國(1989)。在家自行教育之觀感與建議。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳武典(1990)。特殊教育的理念與做法.肆、智障篇。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳武典、林寶貴(1992)。特殊兒童綜含輔導手冊--第二次全國特殊兒童普查結果之應用。臺灣師大特殊教育研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.林赀美(1989)。中重度殘障兒童在家自行教育措施的探討。  延伸查詢new window
7.日本精神薄弱者福祉聯盟(1992)。精神薄弱問題白書--1993年版。東京:日本文化科學社。  延伸查詢new window
8.加藤忠雄、西村圭也(1992)。先生の宅配便。京都市:文理閣圖書。  延伸查詢new window
9.Reynolds, M. C.、Birch, J. W.(1982)。Tracking exceptional children in all American schools。Reston, VA:The Council for Exceptional Children。  new window
10.王善美(1993)。臺灣省各縣市實施在家自行教育制度概況調查研究。屏東縣特殊兒童鑑定及就學輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
11.郭為藩(1993)。特殊兒童心理與教育。臺北:文景書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部國教司(1993)。國民教育工作報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(1995)。中華民國身心障礙教育簡介。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳榮華(1994)。當前國內特殊教育發展的困境及其因應之策略,金門。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(1989)。七十六學年度國民小學中重度啟智教育訪視工作報告。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部特殊兒童普查執行小組(1993)。中華民國第二次特殊兒童普查報告,台北市:教育部教育研究委員會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top