《周禮》、《禮記》二經，因歷代迻錄，或經後人妄改，殆非其舊，惜乎今日仍然可見之二經古本，不過唐、宋舊槧而已，距離二經之編纂年代已遠，學者單據版本所見異文，實難以考證二經舊貌；今考東漢高誘為《淮南子》、《呂氏春秋》兩書作《注》，嘗博徵古籍以為說解，當中屢引《周禮》、《禮記》為《注》（惟未見引錄《儀禮》者）。高誘生在東漢，其所見書蓋為近古，據高《注》引《周禮》、《禮記》以比勘今本，考其異同，或可推知二經之古本舊貌，於二經之斠讎，不無裨益；反之，兩書高《注》引錄二經文字有因歷代傳鈔而訛誤者，亦可據二經今本斠正之。本文嘗試輯錄兩書高《注》引《周禮》、《禮記》例，以比勘今本，並作校釋。

　　　　　All extant editions of the two classics Zhouli and Liji, even those of the T'ang and Sung dynasties, have suffered textual corruption. Gao You, a scholar of the Eastern Han, left behind citations from these two classics in his commentaries on Huainanzi and Lushichunqiu. This article, by comparing Gao's citations with the texts of the extant editions, has identified the differences between these versions of the two classics.