:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:玄學與形神思想
書刊名:中國文哲研究集刊
作者:戴璉璋
作者(外文):Tai, Lian-chang
出版日期:1998
卷期:13
頁次:頁203-241
主題關鍵詞:玄學Hsuan-hsuehHsingShenYuWu
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(3) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:34
  • 點閱點閱:30
     所謂形神思想,是指先秦以來從形體與精神兩方面著眼據以討論生命問題的一種思想。依筆者觀察,這種思想發展到魏晉南北朝時代,有一重大轉變。不但在論述領域方面擴大了,而且思維模式也變得有多樣性。筆者從嵇康形神相親的養生論述、慧遠形盡神不滅的佛學論述及顧愷之、宗炳以形寫神的繪畫論述之中,勾勒出其所蘊涵的返無全有、崇本息末及明無因有等這些玄理。並且指出這些玄理使得嵇康等人的形神論述提升了思想的高度,強化了義理的深度;而嵇康等人在形神論述方面的文化實踐,則使玄理得以落實,彰顯出其豐富的意義。
     The term hsing-shen (form-spirit) thought refers to a kind of thinking, which began before the Ch'in. As it discusses questions of life, this mode of thought makes an effort to keep both the physical form and its spiritual aspect as the focus of discourse. As far as the present author can tell from his studies, this kind of thought underwent a great change by the time it developed to the Wei-Chin and Northern-Southern Dynasties. Not only was the domain of discourse extended, but the styles of thinking also multiplied. This article considers such examples as: Chi K'ang's doctrine of nourishing life by the mutual intimacy of material form and spirit; Hui Yuan's Buddhist doctrine of the non-destruction of the spirit when the material form has come to an end; and the painterly doctrines of Ku K'ai-chih and Tsung Ping on using the physical form to portray the spirit. In this way, the present author highlights such principles of hsuan-hsueh as “return to nothing to complete positive existence,”“exalt the root and relieve the branches,”as well as“illuminate the substance (non-being) with the appearance (beings).” Moreover, this article points out that such principles of hsuan-hsueh allowed the hsing-shen discourse of people such as Chi K'ang to bring thought to a higher level, and to strengthen and deepen the philosophical and ethical teachings of yi-li. The cultural achievements of the discourse on hsing-shen by people such as Chi K'ang brought hsuan-hsueh to fruition, and manifested its rich and deep significance.
期刊論文
1.戴璉璋(19950900)。郭象的自生說與玄冥論。中國文哲研究集刊,7,39-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.楊勇(1973)。世說新語校箋。世說新語校箋。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.戴望(1955)。管子校正。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.王先謙(197107)。莊子集解。台北:蘭台書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭沫若(1982)。郭沫若全集。北京:科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.沈約(1973)。宋書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.王先謙(1955)。荀子集解。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.湯用彤(1962)。漢魏兩晉南北朝佛教史。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.阮籍、陳伯君(1985)。阮籍集校注。北京市:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.康德、牟宗三(1982)。康德的道德哲學。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.牟宗三(1985)。圓善論。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.李澤厚、劉綱紀(1987)。中國美學史。臺北:谷風出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.王充(1955)。論衡。臺北:世界書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.嵇康、載明揚(1978)。嵇康集校注。河洛圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.莊周、郭象、郭慶藩(1991)。莊子集釋。華正。  延伸查詢new window
15.王弼、樓宇烈(1980)。王弼集校釋。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.姚察、姚思廉(1973)。梁書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
17.房玄齡(1974)。晉書。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(唐)張彥遠(1962)。歷代名畫記,上海。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1958)。全晉文,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)孫詒讓(1955)。墨子閒詁,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)畢阮(1955)。呂氏春秋新校正,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(漢)高誘(1958)。淮南子注,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(南宋)朱熹(1974)。楚辭集注,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(東晉)葛洪(1955)。抱朴子,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.(唐)釋道宣(1979)。廣弘明集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(魏)劉邵(1955)。人物志,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(魏)王弼(1981)。周易注疏,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.任繼愈(1988)。中國哲學發展史(3)。中國哲學發展史(3)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1981)。左傳注疏。十三經注疏。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE