資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.16.255.126)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
運用模組開發活動培育STS教師之可行性研究
書刊名:
科學教育學刊
作者:
蘇育任
作者(外文):
Su, Yu-jen
出版日期:
1997
卷期:
5:2
頁次:
頁245-266
主題關鍵詞:
科學素養
;
科技社會互動模組
;
科技社會教學素養
;
教師專業成長
;
Scientific literacy
;
STS literacy
;
STS modules
;
Teacher professional development
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
9
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(
1
)
排除自我引用:
7
共同引用:0
點閱:21
STS課程的科學教育,以解決當代地方或而和科技有關之社會議題為焦點,使常生能把所學的科學知識與科學技能,應用在日常生活動當中。這種課程重視社會議題,考慮到科對社會生活之關聯,並能培養學生價值判斷以及作決定解決問題的能力。由於STS教學著重情境中之學習,學生位於整個學習的中心,以他們想要解決的問題作為活動的焦點,使學生經常有發問及討論。 唯初次參與STS活動者,往往不知如何自行建構自己的知能,教師必須使用適當的鷹架,來輔助學生藉著設計教學模組的活動,學得良好之建構教學能力,以培育其卓越之教學專業技能。近年來,有關放射性與輻射性的意外事件層出不窮,對整個社會衝擊甚大,本研究乃嘗試利用輻射鋼?事件與核能力電廠放射性物質外洩等和學生日常生活密切相關的社會議題,師生命作共同開發設計和核化學有關的STS模組,並探討運用下列方法:模擬、實地參觀、分組討論、角色扮演以及合作學習等,以利用開發模組作為師資培育之教學策略,使師院學生與師資班學生能藉著開發模組的活動過程而學到STS教學所需要的專業知能。並以質的研究察學生的學習過程與結果,據以歸納出重要發現,作為師資培訓練之參考。 由本研究發經由開發STS核化學模組與運用其進行教學時,師院學生的學習興趣高昂,能針對日常生活中的社會議題,主動蒐集資料,以設法解決當地社區的問題。學生對核化內容能自行建構其個人性的意義,將其與社會、相關科技緊密相聯,因而增進其STS的素養。唯研究中也暴露不少實際問題,是有心進行STS教學者必須正視與解決的。總括來說,STS模組的開發與應用,可作為師資培育的優良教學策略。
以文找文
There is current wave of educational reform in Taiwan reform in Taiwan to change our goals of science education towards Science-Technology-Society literacy. STS programs develop in students higher cognitive abilities which integrate and social needs. Since teachers have long played the key role in inducing any change in school science curriculum and practices, this paper focuses on teachers. Although it has been suggested that developing STS module could foster students' critical thinking, problem-solving and the ability to take social actions, empirical investigations need to be done to test this claim. This study was conducted to examine of designing activities for STS modules could be used as an effective instructional strategy in pre-service teacher education. This paper is divided into three parts. The first section focuses on the development of STS prototype modules of nuclear of nuclear chemistry in the curriculum of General Chemistry for use in national teachers colleges. The second section focuses on the application of to various instructional strategies and learning modes in the learning activities of pre-service teachers. The third section focuses on the utilization of the developed modules in enhancing the STS professional competence of both the lecturers and pre-service primary teachers in the national teachers colleges. The students designed the STS units and utilized them in micro-teaching experiences. Based upon the results from observing classroom activities and students' journals throughout the learning processes, students were found to be highly motivated, more able to relate their subject knowledge to the real-life situations, and better prepared to broaden their societal and world views. it appears that the STS module developing activity can be an effective strategy in the teacher education by which students foster their open-ended thinking and problem-solving ability.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
楊榮祥(199204)。國際數理教育評鑑IAEP--我們能夠學到什麼?。科學教育月刊,149,1-31。
延伸查詢
2.
Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1990)。Social skills for successful group work。Educational Leadership,47(4),29-33。
3.
Johnson, D. W.、Maruyama, G.、Johnson, R. T.、Nelson, D.、Skon, L.(1981)。Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic. Goal Structures on Achievement: A Meta-Analysis。Psychological Bulletin,89(1),47-62。
4.
Hofstein, A.、Yager, R. E.(1982)。Societal issues as organizers for science education in the 80s。Science and Mathematic,82(7),539-547。
5.
Yager, R. E.(1990)。The science / technology / society movement in the United States: Its origin, evolution, and rationale。Social Education,54,198-201。
6.
Byrne, M. S.、Johnstone, A. H.(1988)。How to make science relevant。School Science Review,70(251),43-46。
7.
Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.、Baird, H. J.、Lazarowitz, R.(1994)。Affective measures on high school students who learned science in a cooperative mode。Australian Science Teachers Journal,40(2),67-71。
8.
Lazarowitz, R.、Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.、Baird, H. J.、Bowlden, V.(1988)。Academic achievement and on-task behavior of high school biology students instructed in a cooperative small investigative group。Science Education,72(4),475-487。
9.
Mossman, K. L.(1990)。Nuclear literacy。Health Physics,58(5),639-643。
10.
Aikenhead, G. S.、Fleming, R. W.、Ryan, A. G.(1987)。High-school graduates' beliefs about science-technology-society. Methods and issues in monitoring students views。Science Education,71,145-161。
11.
Yager, R. E.(1992)。The STS approach parallels constructivist practices。Science Education International,3(2),18-20。
12.
Holman, J.(1987)。Special issues on science, technology and society。International Journal of Science Education,10(4),271-279。
13.
Reporter(1986)。Science through Science。Technology and Society,2(4),15-21。
14.
Yager, R. E.、McCormack, A. J.(1989)。Assessing teaching/learning successes in multiple domains of science and science education。Science Education,73(1),45-58。
15.
Hart, E. P.、Robottom, I. M.(1990)。The science-technology-society movement in science education: A critique of the reform process。Journal of research in science teaching,27(6),575-588。
會議論文
1.
Aikenhead, G. S.(1994)。A review of research into STS science。The annual NARST meeting,(會議日期: 1994/03/28)。Anaheim, CA。
2.
王澄霞、蔡嘵信(1994)。設計開發STS模組之模式。中華民國第九屆科學教育學術研討會,589-616。
延伸查詢
3.
Brinckerhoff, R. F.、Yager, R. E.(1986)。Science and Technology Education for Tomorrow's World。The Exeter II Conference on Secondary School Science Education。Washington, D.C.:National Science Teachers Association。
4.
許春峰(1997)。師院普通化學實驗STS教學模組。中華民國八十六年度STS學術論文研討會,(會議日期: 1997/05/03-04)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。
延伸查詢
5.
Zoller, U.(1987)。Problem solving and decision-making in science-technology-environmental society (STES) education。4th International Symposium on World Trends in Science and Technology Education。Kiel:IPN-Materialen。56-569。
6.
盧玉玲、連啓瑞(1997)。STS教學模組開發模式之建立及其實際教學成效評估。中華民國八十六年度STS學術論文研討會,(會議日期: 1997/05/03-04)。臺北市國立臺灣師範大學。
延伸查詢
研究報告
1.
蘇育任(1996)。開發STS核化學模組與其合作學習法之研究 (計畫編號:NSC85-2514-S-142-003)。
延伸查詢
2.
NSTA(1982)。Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s。Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。
圖書
1.
Hickman, F. W.、Patrick, J. J.、Bybee, R. W.(1987)。Science, technology and society: a framework for curriculum reform in Secondary School Science and Social Studies。Boulder, Colorado:Social Science Education Consortium, Inc.。
2.
Aronson, E.(1978)。The Jigsaw Classroom。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。
3.
Dewey, J.(1938)。How to think。Chicago:University Press。
4.
Holman, J.(1986)。Science and Technology in Society, General Guide for Teachers。Hatfield, Herts:Association for Science Education。
5.
Solomon, J.(1993)。Teaching Science, Technology and Society。Buckingham:Open University Press。
6.
Weart, Spencer R.(1988)。Nuclear Fear: a History of Images。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。
其他
1.
王澄霞(1994)。STS模組開發:教師充實計畫,臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
延伸查詢
圖書論文
1.
Jarcho, I. S.(1985)。Curricular Approaches to Teaching STS: A Report on Units, Modules, and Courses。Science-Technology-Society, 1985 Yearbook。Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。
2.
Sharan, S.、Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.(1980)。A group-investigation method of cooperative learning in the classroom。Cooperation in education。Provo, Utah:Brigham Young University Press。
3.
Carlson, J.(1985)。Methods of teaching STS topic。Science-Technology-Society, 1985 Yearbook。Washington, D.C.:National Science Teachers Association。
4.
Yager, R. E.(1986)。Restructuring science teacher education programs as they move towards an S/T/S focus。Science, Technology and Society: Resources for Science Educators, 1985 AETS Yearbook。Colombus, OH:Association for the Education of Teachers in Science:SMEAC Information Reference Center。
5.
Yager, R. E.(1992)。The constructivist learning model: A must for STS classrooms。ICASE yearbook: The status of science-technology-society reform efforts around the world。Hong Kong:International Council of Associations for Science Education。
6.
Bybee, R. W.(1985)。The sisyphean question in science education: what should scientically and technologically literate persons know, value and doas a citizen?。Science-Technology-Society, 1985 Yearbook。Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。
7.
Penick, J. E.(1985)。A brief look at some outstanding Science, Technology and Society programs。Science Technology Society, 1985 Yearbook。Washington DC:National Science Teachers Association。
8.
Yager, R. E.、Roy, R.(1993)。STS: Most pervasive and most radical of reform approaches to science education。What Research Says to the Science Teacher。Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
誰的STS?--「科學教育」與「科學研究」的「同」與「不同」
2.
臺中縣市國小自然科教師對以STS議題從事教學之調查研究
3.
從爭議性科技議題的教學設計和實踐中詮釋科學教師的角色--個案研究
4.
協助中學數理教師設計STS教學活動之行動研究
5.
「人與自然」課程單元之社會/科學議題接受度與認知型態
6.
國小高年級自然科教科書之比較研究--STS之觀點
7.
國小自然科第十二冊STS教材的研發與試驗
8.
STS活動中共同創造以促進創造力之設計:水果電池
9.
我國科學教育改革的新動向
無相關博士論文
1.
科學-技術-社會(STS)
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code