:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用模組開發活動培育STS教師之可行性研究
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:蘇育任
作者(外文):Su, Yu-jen
出版日期:1997
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁245-266
主題關鍵詞:科學素養科技社會互動模組科技社會教學素養教師專業成長Scientific literacySTS literacySTS modulesTeacher professional development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
     STS課程的科學教育,以解決當代地方或而和科技有關之社會議題為焦點,使常生能把所學的科學知識與科學技能,應用在日常生活動當中。這種課程重視社會議題,考慮到科對社會生活之關聯,並能培養學生價值判斷以及作決定解決問題的能力。由於STS教學著重情境中之學習,學生位於整個學習的中心,以他們想要解決的問題作為活動的焦點,使學生經常有發問及討論。 唯初次參與STS活動者,往往不知如何自行建構自己的知能,教師必須使用適當的鷹架,來輔助學生藉著設計教學模組的活動,學得良好之建構教學能力,以培育其卓越之教學專業技能。近年來,有關放射性與輻射性的意外事件層出不窮,對整個社會衝擊甚大,本研究乃嘗試利用輻射鋼?事件與核能力電廠放射性物質外洩等和學生日常生活密切相關的社會議題,師生命作共同開發設計和核化學有關的STS模組,並探討運用下列方法:模擬、實地參觀、分組討論、角色扮演以及合作學習等,以利用開發模組作為師資培育之教學策略,使師院學生與師資班學生能藉著開發模組的活動過程而學到STS教學所需要的專業知能。並以質的研究察學生的學習過程與結果,據以歸納出重要發現,作為師資培訓練之參考。 由本研究發經由開發STS核化學模組與運用其進行教學時,師院學生的學習興趣高昂,能針對日常生活中的社會議題,主動蒐集資料,以設法解決當地社區的問題。學生對核化內容能自行建構其個人性的意義,將其與社會、相關科技緊密相聯,因而增進其STS的素養。唯研究中也暴露不少實際問題,是有心進行STS教學者必須正視與解決的。總括來說,STS模組的開發與應用,可作為師資培育的優良教學策略。
     There is current wave of educational reform in Taiwan reform in Taiwan to change our goals of science education towards Science-Technology-Society literacy. STS programs develop in students higher cognitive abilities which integrate and social needs. Since teachers have long played the key role in inducing any change in school science curriculum and practices, this paper focuses on teachers. Although it has been suggested that developing STS module could foster students' critical thinking, problem-solving and the ability to take social actions, empirical investigations need to be done to test this claim. This study was conducted to examine of designing activities for STS modules could be used as an effective instructional strategy in pre-service teacher education. This paper is divided into three parts. The first section focuses on the development of STS prototype modules of nuclear of nuclear chemistry in the curriculum of General Chemistry for use in national teachers colleges. The second section focuses on the application of to various instructional strategies and learning modes in the learning activities of pre-service teachers. The third section focuses on the utilization of the developed modules in enhancing the STS professional competence of both the lecturers and pre-service primary teachers in the national teachers colleges. The students designed the STS units and utilized them in micro-teaching experiences. Based upon the results from observing classroom activities and students' journals throughout the learning processes, students were found to be highly motivated, more able to relate their subject knowledge to the real-life situations, and better prepared to broaden their societal and world views. it appears that the STS module developing activity can be an effective strategy in the teacher education by which students foster their open-ended thinking and problem-solving ability.
期刊論文
1.楊榮祥(199204)。國際數理教育評鑑IAEP--我們能夠學到什麼?。科學教育月刊,149,1-31。  延伸查詢new window
2.Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, R. T.(1990)。Social skills for successful group work。Educational Leadership,47(4),29-33。  new window
3.Johnson, D. W.、Maruyama, G.、Johnson, R. T.、Nelson, D.、Skon, L.(1981)。Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic. Goal Structures on Achievement: A Meta-Analysis。Psychological Bulletin,89(1),47-62。  new window
4.Hofstein, A.、Yager, R. E.(1982)。Societal issues as organizers for science education in the 80s。Science and Mathematic,82(7),539-547。  new window
5.Yager, R. E.(1990)。The science / technology / society movement in the United States: Its origin, evolution, and rationale。Social Education,54,198-201。  new window
6.Byrne, M. S.、Johnstone, A. H.(1988)。How to make science relevant。School Science Review,70(251),43-46。  new window
7.Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.、Baird, H. J.、Lazarowitz, R.(1994)。Affective measures on high school students who learned science in a cooperative mode。Australian Science Teachers Journal,40(2),67-71。  new window
8.Lazarowitz, R.、Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.、Baird, H. J.、Bowlden, V.(1988)。Academic achievement and on-task behavior of high school biology students instructed in a cooperative small investigative group。Science Education,72(4),475-487。  new window
9.Mossman, K. L.(1990)。Nuclear literacy。Health Physics,58(5),639-643。  new window
10.Aikenhead, G. S.、Fleming, R. W.、Ryan, A. G.(1987)。High-school graduates' beliefs about science-technology-society. Methods and issues in monitoring students views。Science Education,71,145-161。  new window
11.Yager, R. E.(1992)。The STS approach parallels constructivist practices。Science Education International,3(2),18-20。  new window
12.Holman, J.(1987)。Special issues on science, technology and society。International Journal of Science Education,10(4),271-279。  new window
13.Reporter(1986)。Science through Science。Technology and Society,2(4),15-21。  new window
14.Yager, R. E.、McCormack, A. J.(1989)。Assessing teaching/learning successes in multiple domains of science and science education。Science Education,73(1),45-58。  new window
15.Hart, E. P.、Robottom, I. M.(1990)。The science-technology-society movement in science education: A critique of the reform process。Journal of research in science teaching,27(6),575-588。  new window
會議論文
1.Aikenhead, G. S.(1994)。A review of research into STS science。The annual NARST meeting,(會議日期: 1994/03/28)。Anaheim, CA。  new window
2.王澄霞、蔡嘵信(1994)。設計開發STS模組之模式。中華民國第九屆科學教育學術研討會,589-616。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brinckerhoff, R. F.、Yager, R. E.(1986)。Science and Technology Education for Tomorrow's World。The Exeter II Conference on Secondary School Science Education。Washington, D.C.:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
4.許春峰(1997)。師院普通化學實驗STS教學模組。中華民國八十六年度STS學術論文研討會,(會議日期: 1997/05/03-04)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Zoller, U.(1987)。Problem solving and decision-making in science-technology-environmental society (STES) education。4th International Symposium on World Trends in Science and Technology Education。Kiel:IPN-Materialen。56-569。  new window
6.盧玉玲、連啓瑞(1997)。STS教學模組開發模式之建立及其實際教學成效評估。中華民國八十六年度STS學術論文研討會,(會議日期: 1997/05/03-04)。臺北市國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.蘇育任(1996)。開發STS核化學模組與其合作學習法之研究 (計畫編號:NSC85-2514-S-142-003)。  延伸查詢new window
2.NSTA(1982)。Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s。Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
圖書
1.Hickman, F. W.、Patrick, J. J.、Bybee, R. W.(1987)。Science, technology and society: a framework for curriculum reform in Secondary School Science and Social Studies。Boulder, Colorado:Social Science Education Consortium, Inc.。  new window
2.Aronson, E.(1978)。The Jigsaw Classroom。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
3.Dewey, J.(1938)。How to think。Chicago:University Press。  new window
4.Holman, J.(1986)。Science and Technology in Society, General Guide for Teachers。Hatfield, Herts:Association for Science Education。  new window
5.Solomon, J.(1993)。Teaching Science, Technology and Society。Buckingham:Open University Press。  new window
6.Weart, Spencer R.(1988)。Nuclear Fear: a History of Images。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.王澄霞(1994)。STS模組開發:教師充實計畫,臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Jarcho, I. S.(1985)。Curricular Approaches to Teaching STS: A Report on Units, Modules, and Courses。Science-Technology-Society, 1985 Yearbook。Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
2.Sharan, S.、Hertz-Lazarowitz, R.(1980)。A group-investigation method of cooperative learning in the classroom。Cooperation in education。Provo, Utah:Brigham Young University Press。  new window
3.Carlson, J.(1985)。Methods of teaching STS topic。Science-Technology-Society, 1985 Yearbook。Washington, D.C.:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
4.Yager, R. E.(1986)。Restructuring science teacher education programs as they move towards an S/T/S focus。Science, Technology and Society: Resources for Science Educators, 1985 AETS Yearbook。Colombus, OH:Association for the Education of Teachers in Science:SMEAC Information Reference Center。  new window
5.Yager, R. E.(1992)。The constructivist learning model: A must for STS classrooms。ICASE yearbook: The status of science-technology-society reform efforts around the world。Hong Kong:International Council of Associations for Science Education。  new window
6.Bybee, R. W.(1985)。The sisyphean question in science education: what should scientically and technologically literate persons know, value and doas a citizen?。Science-Technology-Society, 1985 Yearbook。Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
7.Penick, J. E.(1985)。A brief look at some outstanding Science, Technology and Society programs。Science Technology Society, 1985 Yearbook。Washington DC:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
8.Yager, R. E.、Roy, R.(1993)。STS: Most pervasive and most radical of reform approaches to science education。What Research Says to the Science Teacher。Washington, DC:National Science Teachers Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top