:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中學數理教師在職進修課程設計之行動研究(1)--教師轉變與課程調整
書刊名:科學教育學刊
作者:郭重吉江武雄張文華
作者(外文):Guo, Chorng-jeeChiang, Wu-hsiungChang, Wen-hua
出版日期:1997
卷期:5:3
頁次:頁295-320
主題關鍵詞:數理教學在職進修行動研究建構主義概念改變Mathematics and science teachingIn-service trainingAction researchConstructivismConceptual change
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:431
     本研究旨在利用行動研究的方式,致力於中學數理教師暑期在職進修課程的改進。此項課程修訂目標在於:提供在職進修教師合適的理論上的瞭解以及實作的經驗,使其有更多的時間會,對於數理教師的目標與方法,建構出合適的觀點與理解,以致於能有正確的態度和能力,來改進中學的數理教學。 為達成此一目標,在進修課程的結構、教學內容和實施方式上有一個重要做法乃是:配合暑期進修上課所提供的理念、方法和範例,教師們在返回原任教學校教學授課期間,必須以行動研究的方式,針對其任教班級數理教學的改進加以研究。 本文中報導第一年實施情的檢討與改進,重點包括瞭解進修教師對數理教學的看法,結果顯示出三個不同程度的轉變:心態上的察覺、理念的轉變和將採取改進教學的行動等。此外,由所得資料顯示,在暑期上課時間有限具課業緊湊的壓力下,進修教師對於一些新的教學理念和教學策略,不易有深入的了解和充分的體驗;需在返回原任教學校授課期間,從實際教學工作中慢慢加以省思和試驗。由於學員人數眾多,場訪視不易,為達更佳進修效果,建議對進修教師返校授課期間應輔行教學檔案的建立,並從旁協助促成進修教師與同儕、同僚的合作。
     This action research study was focused on improving the curricula design of in-service for science and mathematics teachers enrolling in the summer school. The goal of the revised in-service program was to enhance teachers' theoretical understandings and practical insights regarding the teaching of mathematics and science. The redesigned program provide sufficient time and opportunities for teachers to construct suitable perspectives and understandings for the teaching, and thereby, enabling them to improve science and mathematics teaching. In order to reach such a goal, it was necessary to modify the existing course structures, contents, and instructional methods. One of the important steps taken was that the in-service4 teachers were required to conduct action research studies of their own teaching when they returned to their regular schools. The action research examined their implementation of the ideas, methods, and examples presented in the in-service program. Findings from the first year of this study indicated that some teachers gained increased awareness of what constitute good science teaching, some showed changes in their theoretical perspectives, and there were a few who actually took actions toward improving their own teaching. The stress of time and an overwhelming amount of summer session course work appeared to limit participating teachers' depth of understanding and personal experience with the new instructional principles and teaching strategies. they needed to gradually reflect on these ideas and put into practice what they participating teachers' depth of understanding and personal experience with the new instructional principles and teaching strategies. They needed to gradually reflect on these ideas and put into practice what had studied in the summer. The large number of teachers participating made it impractical for the researchers to have regular on-site visits and to provide necessary guidance and counseling. It was therefore suggested that in the future participating teachers prepare teaching portfolios, and that they be encouraged to establish collaborative action research studies with their peers located in the same region.
期刊論文
1.Clift, R.、Veal, M. L.、Johnson, M.、Holland, P.(1990)。Restructuring teacher education through collaborative action research。Journal of Teacher Education,42(2),52-62。  new window
2.Barton, J.、Collins, A.(1993)。Portfolios in teacher education。Journal of Teacher Education,44(3),200-210。  new window
3.Baird, J. R.、Fensham, P. J.、Gunstone, R. F.、White, R. T.(1991)。The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning。Journal of Research in Science Teachings,28(2),163-182。  new window
4.Feldman, A.(1994)。Erzberger's Dilemma: Validity in Action Research and Science Teachers' Need to Know。Science Education,78(1),83-101。  new window
5.王淑琴(19910600)。科學、數學和科技的本質。物理教育,2/3,1-7。  延伸查詢new window
6.Aksamit, D. L.、Hall, S. P.、Ryan, L.(1990)。Naturalistic Inquiry Applied to the Evaluation of a Teacher Education Program。Teaching and Teacher Education,6(3),215-226。  new window
7.Bennett, C. K.(1993)。Teacher-Researchers: All Dressed Up and No Place to Go?。Educational Leadership,51(2),69-70。  new window
8.Brunkhorst, H. K.、Yager, R. E.、Brunkhorst, B. J.、Apple, M. A.、Andrews, D. M.(1993)。The Salish Consortium for the Improvement of Science Teaching Preparation and Development。Journal of Science Teacher Education,4(2),51-53。  new window
9.Colhoun, E. F.(1993)。Action Research: Three Approaches。Educational Leadership,51(2),62-65。  new window
10.Cornett, J. W.、Yeotis, C.、Terwilliger, L.(1990)。Teacher personal practical theories and their influence upon teacher curricular and instructional actions: A case study of a secondary science teacher。Science Education,74(5),517-529。  new window
11.Corrigan, D.、Loughran, J.(1993)。An Integrated Science Pre-service Teacher Training Course: A Focus on Assessment。Research in Science Education,23,345-346。  new window
12.Ellis, N. E.(1990)。Collaborative Interaction for Improvement of Teaching。Teaching and Teacher Education,6(3),267-277。  new window
13.Huibregtse, I.、Korthagen, F.、Wubbels, T.(1994)。Physics Teachers' Conceptions of Learning, Teaching, and Professional development。International Journal of Science Education,16(5),539-561。  new window
14.Johnson, R. W.(1993)。Where Can Teacher Research Lead? One Teacher's Daydream。Educational Leadership,51(2),66-68。  new window
15.Shymansky, J. A.(1992)。Using Constructivist Ideas to Teach Science Teachers About Constructivist Ideas, Or Teachers Are Students Too!。Journal of Science Teacher Education,3(2),53-57。  new window
16.Stofflett, R. T.(1994)。The accommodation of science pedagogical knowledge: The application of conceptual change constructs to teacher education。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,31(8),787-810。  new window
17.Etchberger, M. L.、Shaw, K. L.(1992)。Teacher change as a progression of transitional images: A chronology of a developing constructivist teacher。School Science and Mathematics,92(8),411-417。  new window
18.Linn, M. C.(1992)。Science Education Reform: Building on the Research Base。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(8),821-840。  new window
19.郭重吉(19880600)。從認知觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學院學報,13,351-379。  延伸查詢new window
20.郭重吉、許玫理(19920600)。從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報,3,531-561。  延伸查詢new window
21.郭重吉(19920500)。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊,20(5),548-570。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.郭重吉(1987)。學生學習風格的研究及其在科學教育上的應用。七十五學年度科學教育學術研討會,187-202。  延伸查詢new window
2.Crawley, F. E.(1995)。Collaborative Action Research in Two High Schools: The Story of SS&C Reform in North Carolina。the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching。San Francisco, CA。  new window
3.Cross, B. E.(1995)。Personal theorizing through action research : Toward an emerging epistemology of practical curriculum inquiry。the annual meeting of the 1995 American Educational Research Association。San Francisco, CA。  new window
4.Shymansky, J. A.、Kyle, W. C. Jr.(1991)。Establishing a research agenda: The Critical Issues of Science Curriculum Reform。The annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,(會議日期: 1990/04/08)。Atlanta, GA:The National Science Foundation。  new window
5.郭重吉(1993)。建構主義與數理課程發展。1993中華民國物理教育學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.郭重吉、江武雄(1992)。從協助學生建構意義的觀點探討國中理化教學的改進 (計畫編號:NSC81-0111-S-018-01)。彰化市:彰化師大。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭重吉、江武雄(1993)。從協助學生建構意義的觀點探討國中理化教學的改進 (計畫編號:NSC-82-0111-S-018-01)。彰化市:彰化師大。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭重吉、江武雄(1995)。中學數理教師在職進修課程設計之行動研究 (計畫編號:NSC 84-2513-S-018-004)。彰化:國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Berlin, D. F.、White, A. L.(1992)。Classroom-Based Action Research by Teachers。Columbus, Ohio:National Center for Science Teaching and Learning。  new window
2.教育部(1995)。中華民國教育報告書:邁向二十一世紀的教育遠景。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
單篇論文
1.King, J. A.,Lonnquist, M. P.(1995)。A Review of Writing on Action Research (1944-present)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dana, T. M.、Davis, N. T.(1993)。On Considering Constructivism for Improving Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning。The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education。Washington, DC:AAAS。  new window
2.Driver, R.(1988)。Theory into Practice II: A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development。Development and Delimmas in Science Education。London:Falmer Press。  new window
3.Gallagher, J. J.(1993)。Secondary Science Teachers and Constructivist Practice。The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education。Washington, DC:AAAS。  new window
4.Peterman, F. P.(1993)。Staff Development and the Process of Changing: A Teacher's Emerging Constructivist Beliefs about Learning and Teaching。The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education。Washington, DC:AAAS。  new window
5.Russell, T.(1993)。Learning to Teach Science: Constructivism, Reflection, and Learning from Experience。The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education。Washington, DC:AAAS。  new window
6.Taylor, P. C. S.(1993)。Collaborating to Reconstruct Teaching: The Influence of Researcher Beliefs。The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education。Washington, DC:AAAS。  new window
7.White, R. T.、Tisher, R. P.(1986)。Research on Natural Science。Handbook of Research on Teaching。New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE