:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:蒙特梭利教學法與單元教學法對幼兒發展影響之比較研究
書刊名:家政教育學報
作者:簡淑真 引用關係
作者(外文):Chien, Shu-chen
出版日期:1998
卷期:1
頁次:頁59-88
主題關鍵詞:蒙特梭利教學法單元教學法教學法成效研究幼兒發展幼兒教育Montessori methodThematic methodProgram effectChild developmentEarly childhood education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:93
     本研究以準實驗研究的方法比較蒙特梭利教學法與單元教學法對幼兒發展--包括個人--社會、生活適應、動作及認知領域--的影響,並探討教學法與年齡、性別的交互作用。研究對象共57名,蒙氏班28名其中男生15名、女生13名,單元班29名其中男生16名、女生13名。本研究前後測中間相隔七個月,以比西量表及Battelle 發展量表為研究工具以考驗教學法之實施成效; 教學法、性別、年齡為自變項,智力分數及各項前測分數為共變量,進行共變數統計分析。結果發現二種教學法各具特色,在幼兒發展不同領域的各項目中各有影響力,但整體而言,二種教學法之教學效果未具顯著的差異。詳細的研究發現與討論在文中陳述,並就本研究結論提出建議,期能透過比較分析目前臺灣幼稚園、托兒所最普遍實施之兩種教學法對幼兒發展的影響,提供幼兒教育學術、實務界及幼兒家長之參考。
     A pretest-posttest quasi-experimental research was designed to study the effects of the Montessori method and thematic method-the two widely used early childhood teaching methods in Taiwan-on children's development. Sixty children (three dropped out at the end of the study) were matched in age, sex, length in the program, parental education and social class, teachers' personality and teaching style. Programs lasted for seven months, and the Battelle Developmental Inventory (BDI) was used as the instrument to assess children's developmental performance including personal-Social, adaptive, motor and cognitive domains, to test the effects of the teaching methods implemented. The IQ score and the pre-test scores of each domain of the BDI was served as covariates. The analysis of covariance statistic method was conducted to test the significant difference of the method effects. The results showed that the Montessori method had better effect in some domain or subdomains of development; the thematic method showed better effect in other domain or subdomains of development; and in the rest of the areas of development, there were no significant differences found in terms of the method(program) effects. In conclusion, neither method was found to be consistently superior to the other. Based on the results, several recommendations are made for the teachers, parents educational administrators and early childhood researchers.
期刊論文
1.Neisworth, J. T.、Bagnato, S. J.(1986)。Curriculum-based developmental assessment: Congruence of testing and teaching。School Psychology Review,15(2),180-199。  new window
2.Stodolsky, S. S.、Karlson, A. L.(1972)。Differential outcomes of a Montessori curriculum。The Elementary School Journal,72,419-433。  new window
3.孫邦正(19601100)。十年來教學方法發展的趨勢。臺灣教育輔導月刊,10(11),12-17。  延伸查詢new window
4.學前教育月刊編輯部(199011)。蒙特梭利幼兒園知多少。學前教育月刊。  延伸查詢new window
5.Boehnlein, M. M.(1988)。Montessori Research-Analysis in retrospect。The NAMTA Journal,13(3)。  new window
6.Miezitis, S.(1971)。The Montessori method: Some recent research。Interchange,2(2),41-59。  new window
7.Reuter, J.、Yunik, G.(1973)。Social interaction in nursery schools。Developmental Psychology,9(3),319-325。  new window
8.Schakel, J. A.(1986)。Cognitive assessment of preschool children。School Psychology Review,15,200-215。  new window
9.Seefeldt, C.(1981)。Social and emotional adjustment of first grade children with and without Montessori preschool experience。Child Study Journal,11,231-246。  new window
10.Yussen, S. R.、Mathews, S. M.、Knight, J. W.(1980)。Performance of Montessori and traditionally schooled nursery children on social cognitive tasks and memory problems。Contemporary Educational Psychology,5,124-137。  new window
11.盧素碧(19880600)。近四十年來我國幼兒教育之教材及教法。教育資料集刊,13,97-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王筱篁(19920600)。Montessori Education: Its System and Its Effect。幼兒教育學報,1,155-174。  延伸查詢new window
13.Miller, L. B.、Bizzell, R. P.(1983)。Long-term effects of four preschool programs: Sixth, seventh, and eighth grades。Child Development,54(3),727-741。  new window
研究報告
1.簡淑真(1997)。蒙特梭利教學法與單元設計教學法對幼兒發展影響之比較研究 (計畫編號:NSC-80-0301-H-003-20)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.許惠欣(1979)。蒙特梭利教育學說及其與現代幼兒發展和教學理論之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳淑芳(1991)。幼稚園課程研究--蒙特梭利教學模式和一般單元教學模式之證實比較(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林意清(1997)。蒙特梭利感覺教育理論之研究(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊荊生(1994)。臺灣地區蒙特梭利學校之評析(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Black, S.(1977)。A comparison of cognitive and social development in British Infant and Montessori Preschools(博士論文)。Temple University。  new window
6.王淑清(1992)。蒙特梭利實驗教學法與單元設計教學法對幼兒身體動作發展影響之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.林秀慧(1996)。蒙特梭利教學法實施之探討--以兩所台北市幼稚園為例(碩士論文)。國立師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳誕(1974)。蒙特梭里之兒童教育思想(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭青青(1993)。蒙特梭利實驗教學法與單元設計教學法對幼兒創造力發展影響之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hainstock, E. G.、徐瑞仙(1996)。細論蒙特梭利教育。臺北市:及幼文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Montessori, M.、George, A. E.(1912)。The Montessori method。New York:Frederick A. Stokes Company。  new window
3.Standing, E. M.、徐炳勳(1995)。蒙特梭利與兒童教育。臺北:及幼文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳淑琦(1994)。幼兒教育課程設計。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部國民教育司(1987)。幼稚園課程標準。正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.王靜珠(1987)。幼稚教育。台北:文景出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Montessori, M.、李田樹(1991)。童年之祕。台北:及幼文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.許惠欣(1989)。蒙特梭利與幼兒教育。台北:光仁。  延伸查詢new window
9.Montessori, M.、許惠珠(1989)。吸收性心智。台北:及幼文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.Lillard, P. P.、許興仁、邱淑雅(1990)。蒙特梭利新探。台北:及幼文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃寶珠(1976)。幼稚教育資料彙編。台北市立女子師範專科學校。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hainstock, E.(1986)。The Essential Montessori。Plume Publishing Co。  new window
13.Lillard, P. P.(1974)。Montessori: A modern approach。New York:Schocken Books。  new window
14.Miller, L. B.、Dyer, J. L.(1975)。Four preschool programs: Their dimensions and effects。  new window
15.Montessori, M.(1988)。The discovery of the child。Oxford:Clio Press。  new window
16.Montessori, M.(1965)。Spontaneous activity in education。New York:Schocken Books。  new window
17.Montessori, M.(1966)。The secret of childhood。Notre Dame, Indiana:Fides Publishers Inc.。  new window
18.Montessori, Maria、Claremont, C. A.(1967)。The absorbent mind。New York:Dell Publishing Co.。  new window
19.Newerg, J.、Stock, J. R.、Wnek, L.、Guidubaldi, J.、Svinicki, J.(1984)。The battlle developmental inventroy。Allen TX:DLM/Teaching Resources。  new window
20.Standing, E. M.(1966)。Maria Montessori: Her Life and Work。New York。  new window
單篇論文
1.Brophy, J. E.,Choquette, J.(1973)。Divergent Production in Montessori Children,Urbana, IL:Univ. of Illinois Press。(No.080 212)。  new window
2.Chattin-McNichols, J. P.(1992)。Montessori programs in public schools,Urbana, IL:Univ. of Illinois Press。(ED 348165)。  new window
3.Engelmann, S.(1969)。Direct verbal instruction contrasted with Montessori methods in the teaching of normal four-year-old children,Urbana, IL:Univ. of Illinois Press。(ED 041619)。  new window
4.Fleege, U. H.,Black, M.,Rackauskas, J.(1967)。Montessori Preschool education:final report,Urbana:Univ. of Illinois Press。(No.017320)。  new window
5.Jones, B. J.,Miller, L. B.(1979)。Four preschool programs:their learning effects(ED 171415)。  new window
6.Karnes, M. B.(1977)。A research program to determine the effects of various preschool intervention programs on the development of disadvantaged children and the strategic age for such intervention,Urbana:Univ. of Illinois Press。(ED 017319)。  new window
7.McKinnon, J.(1982)。A parative study of the effects of preschool education on middle class children,Urbana, IL:Univ. of Illinois Press。(No.220179)。  new window
8.Reich, C.(1974)。Follow-up of the Montessori program,Urbana, IL:Univ. of Illinois Press。(ED 103134)。  new window
9.Sciarra, D. J.,Dorsey, A.(1976)。Nine-Year Follow up study of Montessori education,Urbana, IL:Univ. of Illinois Press。(ED 121929)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lindauer, S. L.(1987)。Montessori Education for Young Children。Approaches to Early Childhood Education。Columbus, Ohio:Merrill Publishing。  new window
2.簡淑真(1987)。美國幼兒教育。學前教育比較研究。台北:臺灣書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Chattin-McNichols, J. P.(1992)。What does research say about Montessori。Montessori in contemporary American culture。Heinemann Educational Books。  new window
4.Karnes, M. B.、Shwedel, A. M.、Williams, M. B.(1983)。A comparison of five approaches for educating young children from low-income homes。As the Twig is Bent。Hillsdale, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum, Associates。  new window
5.Kohlberg, L.(1968)。Montessori with the culturally disadvantaged: A cognitive-developmental interpretation and some research findings。Early education。Chicago:Aldine。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top