臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：從公民投票經驗之比較研究檢證其基本假設--美英法瑞義為例
書刊名：選舉研究
作者：黃偉峰 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Wei-feng
出版日期：1998
卷期：5:1
頁次：頁1-35
主題關鍵詞：群眾式公投；節制式公投；設定議程；協和式民主；圈選疲乏；Popular referendum；Controlled referendum；Agenda setting；Consociational democracy；Voting fatigue
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:40
　　　　　支持和反對公民投票（簡稱公投）的論點皆曾對其施行效果做出理論上的假設。 然而檢證這些假設的實證研究卻相當零散，致使眾說紛紜，無一系統性的看法。本文比較美 國、英國、法國、瑞士和義大利五國之公投經驗，據此檢證其幾項理論性之假設。本文發現 中介機構遍存於五國公投制度，因此實踐公投並不全然是民粹主義。其次公投的性質常決定 其用途。例如節制式公投易被政黨和政治人物所利用；反觀群眾式公投則多少牽制政府濫權 。固然公投的法定效力足以拘束政府，但其設定議程的威力則可以迫使政府或相關團體事先 讓步。這種設定議程的威力應是我們日後研究公投之重點。
　　　　　Arguments for and against referendum are often based on certain theoretical hypotheses of its practice. However, very little empirical work, with the exception of a few case studies, has been done to test these hypotheses. As a result, the merits and defects of referendum are still in dispute. In this paper, I compare referendum experiences of Switzland, France, Italy, Britain, and the United States. Based on these experiences, I examine various hypotheses of referendum. I find that referendums in these five countries are often mediated by governments or parties, which help to contain the populist impulses of the masses. In addition, I argue that the impact of referendums often extend beyond their legal premises. As a result, I suggest that more attention should be paid to the agenda setting effect of referendum.
期刊論文
1.McKelvey, Richard D.(1976)。Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some implications for Agenda Control。Journal of economic Theory，12(3)，472-482。  new window
2.Magleby, David B.(1988)。Taking the Initiative: Direct Legislation and Direct Democracy in the 1980s。PS: Political Science and Politics，21(3)，600-611。  new window
3.Smith, Gordon(1976)。The Functional Properties of the Referendum。European Journal of Political Research，4(1)，1-23。  new window
4.Dicey, A. V.(1890)。Ought the Referendum to be Introduced into England?。Contemporary Review，505-507。  new window
5.Eule, Julian N.(1990)。Judicial Review of Direct Democracy。Yale Law Journal，99，1503-1589。  new window
6.Gordon, James D.、Magleby, David B.(1989)。Pre-election Judicial Review of Initiatives and Referendums。Notre Dame Law Review，64(3)，298-320。  new window
7.Krauthammer, C.(19961209)。An Orwellian Assault on Democracy。Time，148(26)。  new window
8.Teske, P.、Schneider, M.、Mintrom, M.、Best, S.(1995)。The Empirical Evidence for Citizen Information and a Local Market for Public Good Response。American Political Science Review，89(3)。  new window
9.黃偉峰(19971200)。「次級選舉」理論與歐洲議會選舉：英國經驗資料之檢證。歐美研究，27(4)，199-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Suksi, M.(1993)。Bring in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum。Dordrecht：Martinus Nijhoff。  new window
2.(1989)。Oxford English Dictionary。Oxford：Oxford Univ. Press。  new window
3.Lijphart, A.(1984)。Democracies。New Haven, Conn：Yale Univ. Press。  new window
4.Sartori, G.(1994)。Comparative Constitutional Engineering。New York：NYU Press。  new window
5.Butler, D.、Ranney, A.(1994)。Referendum Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy。Washington, D C：AEI Press。  new window
6.Cronin, T. E.(1989)。Direct Democracy。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard Univ. Press。  new window
7.Gallagher, M.、Uleri, P. V.(1996)。The Referendum Experience in Europe。London：Macmillan。  new window
8.Magleby, D.(1984)。Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States。Baltimore：Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
9.Stockton, D.(1990)。The Classical Athenian Democracy。Oxford：Oxford Univ. Press。  new window
10.Madison, J.(1911)。The Federalist。London：Dent。  new window
11.Barber, Benjamin(1984)。Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age。Univ. of California Press。  new window
12.Padover, S. K.(1939)。Thomas Jefferson on Democracy。New York：New American Library。  new window
13.Barker, E.(1962)。Social Contract: Locke, Hume and Rousseau。New York：Oxford Univ. Press。  new window
14.Dahl, R. A.(1989)。Democracy and its Critics。New Haven, Conn：Yale Univ. Press。  new window
15.Budge, I.(1996)。The New Challenge of Direct Democracy。Oxford：Polity Press。  new window
16.Pitkin, Hanna F.(1969)。Representation。New York, NY：Atherton Press。  new window
17.Sartori, J. G.(1987)。The Theory of Democracy Revisited。Chatham, NJ：Chatham House。  new window
18.Michels, R.(1959)。Political Parties: a Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy。NY：Dover Publication。  new window
19.Arterton, C. F.(1987)。Teledemocracy: Can Technology Protect Democracy。Newbury Park, California：Sage Publication。  new window
20.Dahl, R.(1971)。Polyarchy。New Haven, Conn：Yale Univ. Press。  new window
21.Schofield, N.(1985)。Social Choice and Democracy。Berlin：Springer-Verlag。  new window
22.Riker, W. H.(1982)。Liberalism Against Populism。San Francisco：Oxford：Freeman。  new window
23.Mclean, I.(1989)。Democracy and New Technology。Cambridge：Polity。  new window
24.Key, V. O. Jr.(1956)。American State Politics: An Introduction。New York：Allred A. Knopf。  new window
25.Sears, D. O.、Citrin, J.(1985)。Tax Revolt: Something for Nothing in California。Cambrideg, Mass：Harvard Univ. Press。  new window
26.Popkin, S.(1991)。The Reasoning Voter。Chicago：Chicago Univ. Press。  new window
27.Arrow, Kenneth J.(1951)。Social Choice and Individual Values。New Haven, CT：Yale University Press。  new window
28.Przeworski, Adam、Teune, Henry(1970)。The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
29.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.黃偉峰(19970922)。評析一九九七年蘇格蘭及威爾斯公民投票的結果和意涵。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Morel, Laurence(1996)。France: Toward a Less Controversial Use of the Referendum?。The Referendum Experience in Europe。London：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
2.Balsom, Denis(1996)。The United Kingdom: Constitutional Pragmatism and the Adoption of the Referendum。The Referendum Experience in Europe。Hampshire：Macmillan Press。  new window
3.Kobach, Kris W.(1994)。Switzerland。Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy。Washington, D.C.：The AEI Press。  new window
4.Bogdanor, Vernon(1994)。Western Europe。Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy。Washington, DC：The AEI Press。  new window
5.Burk, E.(1871)。Speech to Bristol Constituents。Burke's Works。London：Bell and Daldy。  new window
6.Magleby, David B.(1994)。Direct Legislation in the American States。Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy。Washington, DC：American Enterprise Institute。  new window
7.Trechsel, A. H.、Kriesi, H.(1996)。Switzerland: the Referendum and Initiative as a Centrepiece of the Political System。The Referendum Experience in Europe。London：Macmillan。  new window
8.Uleri, P. V.(1996)。Italy: Referendums and Initiatives from the Origins to the Crisis of a Democratic Regime。The Referendum Experience in Europe。London：Macmillan。  new window
9.Uleri, P. V.(1996)。[The Referendum Experience in Europe] Introduction。The Referendum Experience in Europe。London：Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1286（臺灣：1279，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2133566 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67928950
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上