:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:試析公民投票對政治與政黨體系之影響
書刊名:臺灣民主季刊
作者:蔡佳泓
作者(外文):Tsai, Chia-hung
出版日期:2004
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁27-41
主題關鍵詞:公民投票政黨體系社會分歧政治信任ReferendumsParty systemSocial cleavagePolitical trust
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:80
本文嘗試釐清公民投票在民主國家中扮演的角色,以及對於政治體系與政黨體系的可能影響。雖然公民投票可能會給政治及政黨體系帶來不確定性,但是分析過去美國及瑞士的公投經驗發現,公民投票影響政治體系的程度不大。而且實証資料也顯示,實行公民投票多年的瑞士人民反而對政治體系有較高的信任感。這個結果證實,公民投票有可能內化成政府及政黨體系的一部份,不見得會完全取代代議政治。而在台灣,公民投票可能成為促使政府回應民意的機制。
It is an explorary analysis of the role that referendums play on the operations of democracies and the extent to which they affect political systems and party systems. Based on the examples of American and European referendums, it is found that the effect of referendums on party systems is very limited. The empirical data analysis of World Value Survey also suggests that people in Switzerland show strong confidence on their political system but not on their party systems, and that Americans who have only local-level referendums have moderate confidence on their political and party systems. In Taiwan, however, people trust parties instead of the government, which implies that the referendum may turn to be a new mechanism that urges the government to be more responsive.
期刊論文
1.Denver, D.(2002)。Voting in the 1997 Scottish and Welsh Devolution Referendums: Information, Interests and Opinions。European Journal of Political Research,41(6),827-843。  new window
2.Pattie, Charles(1999)。Partisanship, National Identity and Constitutional Preferences: An Exploration of Voting in the Scottish Devolution Referendum of 1997。Electoral Studies,18(3),305-322。  new window
3.Setälä, Maija(1999)。Referendums in Western Europe--A Wave of Direct Democracy?。Scandinavian Political Studies,22(4),327-340。  new window
4.黃偉峰(19980500)。從公民投票經驗之比較研究檢證其基本假設--美英法瑞義為例。選舉研究,5(1),1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳義彥、陳陸輝(2002)。政治功效意識、政治信任感以及臺灣選民的民主價值。2001年選舉與民主化調查研究學術研討會。臺北:國立政治大學選舉研究中心。1-30。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fiorina, Morris P.(1977)。Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment。Yale University Press。  new window
2.Cronin, Thomas E.(1989)。Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Setälä, Maijia、廖揆祥、陳永芳、鄧若玲(2003)。公民投票與民主政府。台北:韋伯文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Butler, David、Ranney, Austin(1994)。Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy。Washington, D.C.:AEI Press。  new window
5.Bogdanor, Vernon(1981)。The People and the Party System: The Referendum and Electoral Reform in British Politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Magleby, David B.(1984)。Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States。Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
7.Epstein, Leon D.(1986)。Political Parties in the American Mold。Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
8.Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
9.Ware, Alan(1996)。Political Parties and Party Systems。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Lijphart, Arend(1984)。Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries。Yale University Press。  new window
11.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
12.Apter, David E.(1977)。Introduction to political Analysis。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Winthrop Publishers。  new window
圖書論文
1.Stanley, Jeanie(1992)。Party Realignment in Texas。Party Realignment and State Politics。Columbus:Ohio State University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top